Negotiorum gestio – Roman foundations of unauthorized management of another’s affairs in Serbian civil law

Автор: Nenad Stefanović

Журнал: Pravo - teorija i praksa @pravni-fakultet

Рубрика: Original scientific work

Статья в выпуске: 3 vol.40, 2023 года.

Бесплатный доступ

Negotiorum gestio is a legal institute that originates from Roman law. It still exists today and in the legal literature we find a term that defines it as: the unauthorized performance of another’s affairs, i.e., agency without authority. The institute of negotiorum gestio has been continuously used and is the subject of legal regulation in most countries of the continental, European legal systems, including the law of the Republic of Serbia, for more than two millennia. The aim of this paper is to compare the solutions from Roman and contemporary law of obligations using the normative, descriptive, comparative and analytical-synthetic scientific methods. The paper is divided into three parts: the first part, which deals with the Roman understanding of the negotiorum gestio institute, the second part, which presents the current solutions regarding this institute contained in the Law of Contract and Torts of the Republic of Serbia, and the third part, which, using a comparative and the historical method, draws conclusions about whether current solutions contained in contemporary law are better than those that were applied in the ancient period.

Еще

Roman law, negotiorum gestio, the management of another’s affairs without authorization, civil law, The Law of Contract and Torts

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/170202135

IDR: 170202135   |   DOI: 10.5937/ptp2303019S

Список литературы Negotiorum gestio – Roman foundations of unauthorized management of another’s affairs in Serbian civil law

  • Berger, A. (1968). Encyclopedic dictionary of Roman law – Vol. 43. American Philosophical Society
  • Bujuklić, Ž. (2007). Forum Romanum, Rimska država, pravo religija i mitovi. Forum Romanum, Roman state, law, religion and myths]. Beograd:Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu, JP Službeni glasnik, Downloaded2023, September 1 from https://www.mpravde.gov.rs/files/The%20Law%20of%20Contract%20and%20Torts_180411.pdf3. Gaj, (1982). Institucije. [Institutions]. Beograd: Nolit
  • Jocić, L. (1990). Rimsko pravo.[Roman law]. Novi Sad: KR Slavija
  • Lorenzen, E. G. (1927). Negotiorum Gestio in Roman and Modern Civil Law. Cornell LQ, 13, pp. 190-210
  • Malenica, A., & Deretić, N. (2011). Rimsko pravo. [Roman law]. Novi Sad: Pravni fakultet, Centar za izdavačku delatnost
  • Marković, V. (2015). Razgraničenje zastupništva i srodnih ustanova [The distinction between representation and related legal institutes]. Pravoteorija i praksa, 32(1-3), pp. 30-46
  • Milošević, M. (2005). Rimsko pravo. [Roman law]. Beograd: Nomos
  • Mousourakis, G. (2012). Fundamentals of Roman private law. Springer Science & Business Media
  • Perović, S., & Stojanović, D., red. (1980).Komentar Zakona o obligacionim
  • odnosima, knjiga I [Commentary on the Law of Contract and Torts, Book I]. Gornji Milanovac: Kulturni centar ; Kragujevac: Pravni fakultet
  • Stanojević, O. (2000). Rimsko pravo. [Roman law]. Beograd: Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu
  • Stojčević, D. (1988). Rimsko privatno pravo [Roman private law]. Beograd: Savremena administracija
  • Stojčević, D., & Romac, A. (1971). Dicta et reulae iuris. Beograd: Savremena administracija
  • Šarac, M. (2008). Ratihabitio mandato comparatur. Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta Sveučilišta u Rijeci, 29(2), pp. 761-786
  • Zakon o obligacionim odnosima [The Law of Contract and Torts]. Službeni list SFRJ, br. 29/78, 39/85, 45/89 – odluka USJ i 57/89, Službeni list SRJ, br. 31/93, Službeni list SCG, br. 1/03 – Ustavna povelja i Službeni glasnik RS, br. 18/20
  • Zimmermann, R. (1990). The law of obligations – Roman foundations of the civilian tradition. Juta and Company Ltd.
Еще
Статья научная