Pedagogical theories in online education: teaching implications for online courses
Автор: Wahedi Nargiza
Журнал: Бюллетень науки и практики @bulletennauki
Рубрика: Педагогические науки
Статья в выпуске: 5 т.8, 2022 года.
Бесплатный доступ
As online courses have a pivotal and growing role in the educational curriculum at the present moment, the purpose of the given article is to review the current directions in schools of thought and establish pedagogical applications to be directly applied in course design. Key components of online courses, namely, course and module objectives, instructional materials, the specificity of tasks and assignments are being thoroughly discussed about the theoretical foundations of online education including behaviorism, cognitive, constructive, and connectivist approaches. The entire body of theoretical underpinnings is illustrated with successive teaching samples personally devised for the online course to promote a better understanding of the discussed concepts and supplied with pragmatic recommendations for novice instructors of online courses.
Online course, theory of behaviorism, cognitive approach, constructivist approach, connectivism, online instruction, digital tools
Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/14124408
IDR: 14124408 | DOI: 10.33619/2414-2948/78/83
Список литературы Pedagogical theories in online education: teaching implications for online courses
- Baldwin, S. J., & Ching, Y. H. (2019). An online course design checklist: development and users’ perceptions. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 31(1), 156-172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-018-9199-8
- Skinner, B. F. (1966). What is the experimental analysis of behavior?. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of behavior, 9(3), 213. https://dx.doi.org/10.1901%2Fjeab.1966.9-213
- Rotfeld, H. J. (2007). Theory, data, interpretations, and more theory. The Journal of Consumer Affairs, 41(2), 376-379.
- Clark, K. R. (2018). Learning theories: behaviorism. Radiologic technology, 90(2), 172-175.
- Bargh, J. A., & Ferguson, M. J. (2000). Beyond behaviorism: on the automaticity of higher mental processes. Psychological bulletin, 126(6), 925. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.126.6.925
- Anderson, T. (Ed.). (2008). The theory and practice of online learning. Athabasca University Press.
- Jaleel, S., & Verghis, A. M. (2015). Knowledge Creation in Constructivist Learning. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 3(1), 8-12.
- Moreno, R., Mayer, R., & Lester, J. (2000). Life-like pedagogical agents in constructivist multimedia environments: Cognitive consequences of their interaction. In EdMedia+ Innovate Learning (pp. 776-781). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
- Badie, F. (2015, November). Towards a semantics-based framework for meaning construction in constructivist interactions. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation (pp. 7995-8002).
- Ashcraft, D., Treadwell, T., & Kumar, V. K. (2008). Collaborative online learning: A constructivist example. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 4(1), 109-117.
- Vrasidas, C. (2000). Constructivism versus objectivism: Implications for interaction, course design, and evaluation in distance education. International journal of educational telecommunications, 6(4), 339-362.
- Duke, B., Harper, G., & Johnston, M. (2013). Connectivism as a digital age learning theory. The International HETL Review, 2013(Special Issue), 4-13.
- Downes, S. (2008). Places to go: Connectivism & connective knowledge. Innovate: Journal of Online Education, 5(1), 6.
- Sideeg, A. (2016). Bloom’s Taxonomy, Backward Design, and Vygotsky’s Zone of Proximal Development in crafting learning outcomes. International Journal of Linguistics, 8(2), 158-186.
- Yang, D. (2017). Instructional strategies and course design for teaching statistics online: perspectives from online students. International Journal of STEM Education, 4(1), 1-15.
- Buelow, J. R., Barry, T., & Rich, L. E. (2018). Supporting learning engagement with online students. Online Learning, 22(4), 313-340. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i4.1384
