Pre-angioplasty instantaneous wave-free ratio pullback predicts hemodynamic outcome in diffuse coronary artery disease

Автор: Nammour A.Y., Aboul-enein H.M., Hamouda M., Elhelaly A.A.

Журнал: Cardiometry @cardiometry

Рубрика: Short report

Статья в выпуске: 21, 2022 года.

Бесплатный доступ

Background: Serial stenoses or diffuse vessel narrowing hamper pressure wire-guided management of coronary stenoses. Characterization of functional relevance of individual stenoses or narrowed segments constitutes an unmet need in ischemia-driven percutaneous revascularization. Aim of the Study: To perform hemodynamic mapping of the entire vessel using pullback technique of a pressure guidewire with continuous instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) measurement compared coronary angiography aiming to minimize the procedure, decrease number and length of stents used. Materials and Methods: This study was conducted on 40 patients presented with diffuse coronary artery disease and undergoing elective PCI. Diagnostic coronary angiography using the routine angiographic projections was done with assessment of non-obstructive coronary lesions by 2D quantitative coronary angiography and iFR pullback measurement Results: Percentage of difference between probable sig lesions via pullback technique and No of actual sig lesions for studied group, was (59.5%). The difference was statistically highly significant p=0.0001. Conclusion: Compared with angiography alone, availability of iFR pullback data significantly decreased the number and length of hemodynamically significant lesions identified for revascularization.

Еще

Coronary artery disease, instantaneous wave-free ratio, physiological lesion assessment, stenosis

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/148324187

IDR: 148324187

Список литературы Pre-angioplasty instantaneous wave-free ratio pullback predicts hemodynamic outcome in diffuse coronary artery disease

  • Erne P, Schoenenberger AW, Burckhardt D, et al. Effects of percutaneous coronary interventions in silent ischemia after myocardial infarction: the SWISSI II randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2007; 297:1985-91.
  • Pijls NH, van Schaardenburgh P, Manoharan G, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention of functionally nonsignificant stenosis: 5-year follow-up of the DEFER Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 49:2105-11.
  • Ong AT, van Domburg RT, Aoki J, Sonnenschein K, Lemos PA, Serruys PW. Sirolimus-eluting stents remain superior to bare-metal stents at two years: mediumterm results from the Rapamycin-Eluting Stent Evaluated at Rotterdam Cardiology Hospital (RESEARCH) registry. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 47:1356-60.
  • Lima RS, Watson DD, Goode AR, et al. Incremental value of combined perfusion and function over perfusion alone by gated SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging for detection of severe three-vessel coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003; 42:64-70.
  • Fischer JJ, Samady H, McPherson JA, et al. Comparison between visual assessment and quantitative angiography versus fractional flow reserve for native coronary narrowings of moderate severity.Am J Cardiol 2002; 90:210-5.
  • Meuwissen M, Siebes M, Chamuleau SAJ, Tijssen JGP, Spaan JAE, Piek JJ. Intracoronary pressure and flow velocity for hemodynamic evaluation of coronary stenoses. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther 2003;1:471–9.
  • Van de Hoef TP, Meuwissen M, Escaned J, Davies JE, Siebes M, Spaan JAE, et al. Fractional flow reserve as a surrogate for inducible myocardial ischaemia. Nat Rev Cardiol 2013;10:439–52.
  • Sen S, Escaned J, Malik IS, Mikhail GW, Foale RA, Mila R, et al. Development and validation of a new adenosine-independent index of stenosis severity from coronary wave–intensity analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;59:1392–402.
  • Sen S, Asrress KN, Nijjer S, Petraco R, Malik IS, Foale RA, et al. Diagnostic classification of the instantaneous wave-free ratio is equivalent to fractional flow reserve and is not improved with adenosine administration: results of CLARIFY (Classification Accuracy of Pressure-Only Ratios Against Indices Using Flow Study). J Am Coll Cardiol 2013;61:1409–20.
  • Härle T, Bojara W, Meyer S. Comparison of instantaneous wavefree ratio (iFR) and fractional flow reserve (FFR)—first real world experience. Int J Cardiol. 2015;199:1–7
  • Nijjer SS, Sen S, Petraco R, Sachdeva R, Cuculi F, Escaned J, et al. Improvement in coronary haemodynamics after percutaneous coronary intervention: assessment using instantaneous wave-free ratio. Heart 2013;99:1740–8.
  • Nijjer SS, Sen S, Petraco R, Escaned J, Echavarria- Pinto M, Broyd C, et al. Preangioplasty instantaneous wave-free ratio pullback provides virtual intervention and predicts hemodynamic outcome for serial lesions and diffuse coronary artery disease. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2014;7:1386–96.
  • Ramcharitar S, Daeman J, Patterson M, van Guens RJ, et al., First direct in vivo comparison of two commercially available three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography systems. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2008;71:44–50
  • Takayama T, Hodgson JM. Prediction of the physiologic severity of coronary lesions using 3D IVUS: validation by direct coronary pressure measurements. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2001;53:48– 55.
  • Shaw RF, Mosher P, Ross J Jr et al. Physiologic principles of coronary perfusion. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1962, 44:608-616.
  • Kikuta, Y., Cook, C. M., Sharp, A. S., Salinas, P., Kawase, Y., Shiono, Y., ... & Davies, J. E. Pre-angioplasty instantaneous wave-free ratio pullback predicts hemodynamic outcome in humans with coronary artery disease: primary results of the international multicenter iFR GRADIENT registry. JACC: Cardiovascular interventions, 2018, 11(8), 757-767.
  • Younus, M., & Seto, A. H. Clinical Outcomes Data for Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Interventional cardiology clinics, 2019, 8(2), 121-129.
  • Price, M. J. Updates in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, An Issue of Interventional Cardiology Clinics, Ebook, 2019.
  • Park S-J, Ahn J-M, Pijls NHJ, et al. Validation of functional state of coronary tandem lesions using computational flow dynamics. Am J Cardiol 2012; 110:1578–84.
  • Gotberg M, Cook CM, Sen S, et al. The evolving future of instantaneous wave-free ratio and fractional flow reserve. J Am Coll Cardiol 2017;70(11): 1379–402.
  • Hwang D, Jeon KH, Lee JM, Park J, Kim CH, Tong Y, Zhang J, Bang JI, Suh M, Paeng JC, Na SH, Cheon GJ, Cook CM, Davies JE, Koo BK. Diagnostic performance of resting and hyperemic invasive physiological indices to define myocardial ischemia: validation with 13N-ammonia positron emission tomography. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2017;10:751–760.
  • Jeremias A. Instant Wave-Free Ratio or Fractional Flow Reserve for Hemodynamic Coronary Lesion Assessment? Yes, Just Do It!. Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions. 2018;11(1):e006284.
Еще
Статья научная