Public and private regulation of the forestry sector: the cases of the united states and Canada

Автор: Hendrik Z. Adriaan Van Der Loos, Alimov Andrey Alekseevich

Журнал: Общество. Среда. Развитие (Terra Humana) @terra-humana

Рубрика: Осмысление ноосферы

Статья в выпуске: 2 (35), 2015 года.

Бесплатный доступ

Public regulation is usually regarded as one of the basic rights of the state. This position goes back to the Westphalian concept of national sovereignty. However, these days we see an increase in supranational and private regulation, which is complemented and thus fills the gaps that exist within the framework of public regulation. The purpose of this article is to highlight two different systems of public forest management in the US and Canada. Based on this analysis of modern transnational and private regulation as a means of supplementing and presenting the meaning of national sovereignty in this article, we propose to consider this regulatory field on this basis. Ultimately, the main points outlined in the present article will be used in considering the issue of the Russian forest sector, as the actor having the largest scale in the modern world forestry.

Еще

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/14031900

IDR: 14031900

Список литературы Public and private regulation of the forestry sector: the cases of the united states and Canada

  • Abbott K., Snidal D. The Governance Triangle: Regulatory Standards Institutions and the Shadow of the State//The Politics of Global Regulation; E. Mattli, N. Woods (eds.). -New Jersey, USA: Princeton University Press, 2009. -P. 44-88.
  • Allen R. The Industrial Revolution in Miniature: The Spinning Jenny in Britain, France, and India//The Journal of Economic History. -2009, № 69(4). -P. 901-927.
  • Andonova L., Mitchell R. The Rescaling of Global Environmental Politics//The Annual Review of Environment and Resources. -2010, № 35. -P. 255-282.
  • Breitmeier H., Underdal A., Young O. The Effectiveness of International Environmental Regimes: Comparing and Contrasting Findings from Quantitative Research//International Studies Review. -2011, № 13. -P. 579-605.
  • Cafaggi F. New Foundations of Transnational Private Regulation//Journal of Law and Society. -2011, № 38(1). -P. 20-49.
  • Cashore B. How Canada Compares. International Review of Forest Policy and Regulation. A Summary of a study conducted by Professor Benjamin Cashore, Yale University, July 2004. -Forest Products Association of Canada, 2004.
  • Cashore B., Auld N., Newsom D. Governing Through Markets. Forest Certification and the Emergence of Non-State Authority. -New Haven & London: Yale University Press, 2004.
  • Contreras-Hermosilla A., Gregerson H., White, A. Forest Governance in Countries with Federal Systems of Government. Lessons and Implications for Decentralization. -Bogor, Indonesia: Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), 2008.
  • Davenport D. An Alternative Explanation for the Failure of the UNCED Forest Negotiations//Global Environmental Politics. -2005, № 5(1). -P. 105-130.
  • Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Major Existing EPA Laws and Programs That Could Affect Agricultural Producers. -Environmental Protection Agency. Agricultural Counselor. Office of the Administrator, 2007.
  • Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Forestry. -2013. URL: http://www.epa.gov/agriculture/forestry.html (07.12.2014)
  • Espach R. Private Regulation Amid Public Disarray: An Analysis of Two Private Environmental Regulatory Programs in Argentina//Business and Politics. -2005, № 7(2).
  • Espach R. Private Environmental Regimes in Developing Countries. Globally Sown, Locally Grown. -New York, USA: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009.
  • European Union. Regulation (EU) № 995/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 October 2010//Official Journal of the European Union. 2010, № 53(L295). -P. 1-90.
  • Falk R. Revising Westphalia, Discovering Post-Westphalia//The Journal of Ethics. -2002, № 6(4). -P. 311-352.
  • Finney J. Forest Resources and Conservation//Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. -1910, № 35(1). -P. 67-76.
  • Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO). Global Forest Resources Assessment. Main Report. № 163. -Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2010.
  • Food And Agricultural Organization (FAO). Global Forest Products Facts and Figures. -2011. -URL: http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/user_upload/newsroom/docs/2011%20GFP%20Facts%20and%20Figures.pdf (07.12.2014)
  • Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). The Russian Federation Forestry Sector. Outlook Study to 2030. -Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2012.
  • Forest Stewardship Council (FSC). FSC Principles and Criteria for Forest Stewardship. -Forest Stewardship Council A.C. FSC-STD-01-001 (version 4-0), 1996.
  • Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) Russia National Office. -FSC Forest Stewardship Council Standard for Russian Federation. FSC Russian National Office, 2012.
  • Graz J., Nölke A. Transnational Private Governance and its Limits. -London & New York: Routledge: Taylor & Francis Group, 2008.
  • International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD). The State of Sustainability Initiatives Review. -Manitoba, Canada, 2014.
  • International Monetary Fund. World Economy Outlook Database 2014. -2014. URL: http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2014/02/weodata/weorept.aspx?pr.x=30&pr.y=9&sy=2014&ey=2014&scsm=1&ssd=1&sort=country&ds=.&br=1&c=156&s=NGDPD%2CNGDPDPC%2CPPPGDP%2CPPPPC&grp=0&a (06.01.2015)
  • ISEAL. About Us. -2012. -URL: http://www.isealalliance.org/about-us (08.01.2015)
  • ISEAL. Full Members. -2012. URL: http://www.isealalliance.org/our-members/full-members (08.01.2015)
  • Karvinen S., Välkky E., Torniainen T., Gerasimov Y. Northwest Russian Forestry in a Nutshell. -Helsinki, Finland: Finnish Forest Research Institute, 2006.
  • Langhelle O. Sustainable Development: Exploring the Ethics of “Our Common Future”//International Political Science Review. -1999, № 20(2). -P. 129-149.
  • Manin B. Principes du gouvernement représentatif. -Paris, France: Calmann-Lévy, 1995.
  • Meidinger E. The Administrative Law of Global Public-Private Regulation: The Case of Forestry//The European Journal of International Law. -2006, № 17(1). -P. 47-87.
  • Natural Resources Canada. Canada’s Forests: Key Facts. -Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 2014. (represented by the Minister of Natural Resources Canada)
  • Natural Resources Canada. Forests. Legality and Sustainability. -2014. -URL: http://www.nrcan.gc.ca/forests/canada/sustainable-forest-management/13303 (06.01.2015)
  • O’Neill K. The Environment and International Relations. -New York, USA: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
  • Programme for the Endorsement of Forest Certificates (PEFC). Sustainable Forest Management -Requirements. -PEFC Council, 2010.
  • Regulation. In The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Politics (3 ed.). -2014. -URL: http://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780199207800.001.0001/acref-9780199207800-e-1146?rskey=wX2HZU&result=1226 (06.12.2014)
  • Russian Federal Forestry Agency. Лесная политика. -URL: http://www.rosleshoz.gov.ru/activity/politics (07.12.2014)
  • Smith A. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of the Nations (Electronic Classics Series). -Pennsylvania, USA: Pennsylvania State University, 2005. (Original work published 1776)
  • Smith B., Darr D. U.S. Forest Resource Facts and Historical Trends. -Virginia, USA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, 2004.
  • Statista. Facts on the U.S. Forest Products Industry. -2015. -URL: http://www.statista.com/topics/1316/forest-products-industry/(04.01.2014)
  • Statisa. Financial key figures of the U.S. forest, paper and packaging (FPP) industry in 2010 and 2012. -2015. -URL: from http://www.statista.com/statistics/252978/financial-key-figures-of-the-us-forest-paper-and-packaging-industry/(04.012014)
  • Statistics Canada 2014. Population by year, by province and territory. -URL: http://www.statcan.gc.ca/tables-tableaux/sum-som/l01/cst01/demo02a-eng.htm (22.01.2015)
  • Suchman M. Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches//The Academy of Management Review. -1995, № 20(3). -P. 571-610.
  • United Nations. Report of the United Nations Conference on Environmental and Development. -1992. -URL: http://www.un.org/documents/ga/conf151/aconf15126-1annex1.htm (07.12.2014)
  • United Nations. The North American Forest Sector Outlook Study 2006-2030. -Geneva, Switzerland: United Nations Publishing Service, 2012.
  • United Nations Environmental Program. Declaration of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment. -2014. -URL: http://www.unep.org/Documents.Multilingual/Default.asp?documentid=97&articleid=1503 (06.12.2014)
  • U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Lacey Act. -URL: http://www.fws.gov/international/laws-treaties-agreements/us-conservation-laws/lacey-act.html (06.01.2015)
  • World Commission on Environment and Development. Our Common Future. -Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 1987.
  • World Bank. GDP (Current US$). -URL: http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.CD (22.01.2015)
  • Young O. Effectiveness of international environmental regimes: Existing knowledge, cutting-edge themes, and research strategies//Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. -2011, № 108(50). -P. 19853-19860.
Еще
Статья научная