Рак молочной железы: диагностические сложности и ошибки

Автор: Меских Е.В., Оксанчук Е.А., Солодкий В.А.

Журнал: Вестник Российского научного центра рентгенорадиологии Минздрава России @vestnik-rncrr

Статья в выпуске: 2 т.20, 2020 года.

Бесплатный доступ

Диагностика заболеваний молочных желез требует внимания, навыков и опыта. Необходима и значима комплексная оценка анамнеза, факторов риска, возраста, данных физикального и инструментального обследования. В статье описаны основные диагностические сложности и ошибки диагностики рака молочной железы, в том числе, его редких форм.

Молочная железа, диагностика, метод исследования, маммография, ультразвуковое исследование, рак молочной железы

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/149132137

IDR: 149132137

Список литературы Рак молочной железы: диагностические сложности и ошибки

База данных GLOBOCAN [электронный ресурс]. URL: http://gco.iarc.fr/ (дата обращения 08.08.2019).
Каприн А.Д., Старинский В.В., Петрова Г.В. Состояние онкологической помощи России в 2017 году. Москва. 2018.
Broeders M., Moss S., Nystrom L., et al. The impact of mammographic screening on breast cancer mortality in Europe: a review of observational studies. J Med Screen. 2012. V. 19 Suppl 1. P. 14-25.
Kevin C.O., Fontham E.T.H., Etzioni R., et al. Breast cancer screening for women at average risk: 2015 guideline update from the American Cancer Society. JAMA. 2015. V. 314. No. 15. P. 1599-1614.
Giess S.S., Frost E.P., BirdwellR.L. Difficulties and errors in diagnosis of breast neoplasms. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2012. V. 33. No. 4. P. 288-299.
Palazzetti V., Guidi F., Ottaviani L., et al. Analysis of mammographic diagnostic errors in breast clinic. Radiol Med. 2016. V. 121. No. 11. P. 828-833.
EkpoE.U., AlakhrasM., Brennan P. Errors in Mammography Cannot be Solved Through Technology Alone. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2018. V. 19. No. 2. P. 291-301.
Ho J.M., Jafferjee N., Covarrubias G.M., et al. Dense breasts: a review of reporting legislation and available supplemental screening options. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014. V. 203. No. 2. P. 449-456.
Sprague B.L., Gangnon R.E., Burt V., et al. Prevalence of mammographically dense breasts in the United States. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014. V. 106. No. 10. P. 1-6.
Georgen S.K., Evans J., Cohen G.P., MacMillan J. H. Characteristics of breast carcinomas missed by screening radiologists. Radiology. 1997. V. 204. No. 1. P. 131-135.
McCormack V.A., dos Santos Silva I. Breast density and parenchymal patterns as markers of breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006. V. 15. No. 6. P.1159-1169.
Berg W.A., Blume J.D., Cormack J.B., et al. Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer. 2008. V. 299. No. 18. P. 2151-2163.
Devolli-DishaE., Manxhuka-^rliu S., YmeriH., Kutllovci A. Comparative accuracy of mammography and ultrasound in women with breast symptoms according to age and breast density. Bosn J Basic Med Sci. 2009. V. 9. No. 2. P. 131-136.
Malhotra G.K., Zhao X., BandH., Band V. Histological, molecular and functional subtypes of breast cancers. Cancer Biol Ther. 2010. V. 10. No.10. P. 955-960.
SilversteinM.J., LewinskyB.S., Waisman J.R., etal. Infiltrative lobular carcinoma. Is it different from infiltrating duct carcinoma? Cancer. 1994. V. 73. No. 6. P. 1673-1677.
Johnson К., Sarma D., HwangE.S. Lobular breast cancer series: imaging. Breast Cancer Res. 2015. V. 17. No. 1. Article ID 94.
Мартынова Г.В. Редкие формы рака молочной железы. Лечение и прогноз. Дис. канд. мед. наук. М., 2009.
Li CI., Uribe D.J., Daling J.R. Clinical characteristics of different histologic types of breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 2005. V. 93. No. 9. P. 1046-1052.
Dabbs D.J. Special Types of Breast Carcinoma. Breast Pathology. 1st Edition. 2012. 816 p. Imprint: Saunders, eBook ISBN: 9780323245982, eBook ISBN: 9781455737567.
Kum Pal S.K., Lau S.K., Kruper L., et al. Papillary carcinoma of the breast: an overview. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010. V. 122. No. 3. P. 637-645.
Lam W.W., Chu W.C., Tang A.P., et al. Role of radiologic features in the management of papillary lesions of the breast. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006. V. 186. No. 5. P. 1322-1327.
Di Saverio S., Gutierrez J., Avisar E. A retrospective review with long term follow up of 11,400 cases of pure mucinous breast carcinoma. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008. V. 111. No. 3. P. 541-547.
Goodman D.N., Boutross-Tadross O., Jong R.A. Mammographic features of pure mucinous carcinoma of the breast with pathological correlation. Can Assoc Radiol J. 1995. V. 46. No. 4. P. 296-301.
Gunhan-Bilgen I., Oktay A. Mammographic features of local recurrence after conservative surgery and radiation therapy: comparison with that of the primary tumor. Acta Radiol. 2007. V. 48. No. 4. P. 390-397.
Lam W.W.M., Chu W.C., Tse G.M., Ma T.K. Sonographic appearance of mucinous carcinoma of the breast. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004. V. 182. No. 4. P. 1069-1074.
Aparicio I., Martinez A., Hernandez G., et al. Squamous cell carcinoma of the breast. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2008. V. 137. No. 2. P. 222-226.
Marginean F., Rakha E.A., Ho B.C., et al. Histological features of medullary carcinoma and prognosis in triple-negative basal-like carcinomas of the breast. Mod Pathol. 2010. V. 23. No. 10. P. 1357-1363.
Huober J., Gelber S., Goldhirsch A., et al. Prognosis of medullary breast cancer: analysis of 13 International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG) trials. Ann Oncol. 2012. V. 23. No. 11. P. 2843-2851.
AbdulRashidS., Rahmat K., Jayaprasagam K. Medullary carcinoma of the breast: role of contrast-enhanced MRI in diagnosis of multiple breast lesions. Biomed Imaging Interv J. 2009. V. 5. No. 4. P. e27.
Pezzi C.M., Patel-Parekh L., Cole K., et al. Characteristics and treatment of metaplastic breast cancer: analysis of 892 cases from the National Cancer Data Base. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007. V. 14. No. 1. P. 166-173.
Yi-Chen Lai., Chih-Yi Hsu., Yi-Hong Chou., et al. Sonographic presentations of metaplastic breast cancers. J Chin Med Assoc. 2012. V. 75. No. 11. P. 589-594.
Gunhan-Bilgen I., Memi§ A., Ustun E.E., et al. Metaplastic carcinoma of the breast: clinical, mammographic, and sonographic findings with histopathologic correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002. V. 178. No. 6. P. 1421-1425.

Еще

Статья научная