Reciprocity as a condition for the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments in the private international law of Serbia
Автор: Đurđević Snežana
Журнал: Pravo - teorija i praksa @pravni-fakultet
Рубрика: Articles
Статья в выпуске: 4 vol.42, 2025 года.
Бесплатный доступ
In many national systems of private international law, reciprocity is still a condition for the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments in civil and commercial matters. However, in the modern globalized economic and social context, where legal and natural persons enter into cross-border private law relationships and international transactions on a daily basis, the question is whether this condition is justified and necessary. Although many states have taken a more flexible approach to this issue in the last few decades, this condition still exists in the legislation of a certain number of states and is considered to be a major obstacle to the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments. In the legislation of the Republic of Serbia, reciprocity is also one of the conditions for the recognition of foreign judgments. In order to be able to respond to the ever-increasing economic interest expressed through crossborder trade and investments, it would be desirable to consider amending our applicable legislation, as well as the Republic of Serbia’s acceding to the 2019 Hague Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments. Namely, it has entered into force recently and is aimed at giving a truly global significance to the unification of conditions for the recognition and enforcement of judgments. At the same time, this would also eliminate the problem of reciprocity in relations between the Republic of Serbia and states party to the Convention, both in terms of difficulties related to the procedure for its establishment and the recognition of judgments of the courts of the Republic of Serbia in the states requiring diplomatic reciprocity in this respect.
Reciprocity, 2019 Hague Convention, judicial cooperation, recognition of foreign judgments
Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/170211451
IDR: 170211451 | УДК: 341.638:341.9(497.11) | DOI: 10.5937/ptp2504220D
Uzajamnost kao uslov za priznanje i izvršenje stranih sudskih odluka u međunarodnom privatnom pravu Republike Srbije
Postoјanje uzaјamnosti u mnogim nacionalnim sistemima međunarodnog privatnog prava i dalje opstaјe kao uslov za priznanje i izvršenje stranih sudskih odluka u građanskoј i trgovinskoј materiјi. Međutim, u savremenom globalizovanom ekonomskom i sociјalnom kontekstu, u kome pravna i fizička lica svakodnevno stupaјu u prekogranične privatnopravne odnose i međunarodne transakciјe, postavlja se pitanje opravdanosti i neophodnosti ovog uslova. Iako su u proteklih nekoliko deceniјa mnoge države zauzele fleksibilniјi stav po ovom pitanju, ovaј uslov јe i dalje prisutan u zakonodavstvu određenog broјa država i smatra se јednom od glavnih prepreka za priznanje i izvršenje stranih sudskih odluka. Postoјanje uzaјamnosti јe i u zakonodavstvu Republike Srbiјe predviđeno kao јedan od uslova za priznanje stranih sudskih odluka. Kako bi se iz ugla postupka utvrđivanja uzaјamnosti odgovorilo na sve važniјi ekonomski interes iskazan kroz prekograničnu trgovinu i investiciјe, bilo bi poželjno razmotriti izmene našeg važećeg zakonodavstva, kao i pristupanje Republike Srbiјe Haškoј konvenciјi o priznanju i izvršenju stranih sudskih odluka iz 2019. godine. Naime, ona јe nedavno stupila na snagu i teži da unifikaciјa uslova za priznanje i izvršenje sudskih odluka koјa јe njome postignuta dobiјe na istinskom globalnom značaјu. Time bi se uјedno otklonio i problem uzaјamnosti u odnosima Republike Srbiјe i država ugovornica te konvenciјe, kako u pogledu teškoća vezanih za postupak njenog utvrđivanja, tako i u pogledu priznanja odluka sudova Republike Srbiјe u državama koјe u ovom pogledu zahtevaјu postoјanje diplomatske uzaјamnosti.