Ritual frame indicating expressions (an academic conversation)

Бесплатный доступ

The present paper is based on an interview, conducted by Victor V. Leontyev with Juliane House and Dániel Z. Kádár. It provides an overview of a new theory in pragmatics, namely, Ritual Frame Indicating Expressions (RFIEs). This theory provides a bottom-up and corpus-based approach to the study of various pragmatically important expressions through which the participants of an interaction indicate their awareness of the Ritual Frame underlying the interaction. ‘Ritual Frame’ encompasses a cluster of standard situations in which the rights and obligations of the participants are clearly defined. The corpus-based RFIE approach complements sociopragmatic approaches to various expression types, including so-called ‘politeness markers’, honorifics, forms of address and so on, and it also helps us to systematically capture the relationship between expressions and speech acts. In studying RFIEs, the analyst focuses on the ways in which RFIEs spread across various standard situations. The study of this issue also allows the researcher to contrastively examine the use of RFIEs across linguacultures. Such contrastive research helps us to unearth major linguacultural differences. For example, the research of J. House and D.Z. Kádár has revealed that while in East Asian linguacultures such as Chinese RFIEs tend to be strongly associated with a particular speech act, this relationship is casual in Western linguacultures.

Еще

Ritual frame indicating expressions, standard situations, conventionalisation, politeness, contrastive pragmatic analysis

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/149137942

IDR: 149137942   |   DOI: 10.15688/jvolsu2.2021.2.4

Список литературы Ritual frame indicating expressions (an academic conversation)

  • Bax M., 2010. Rituals. Jucker A., Taavitsainen I., eds. Historical Pragmatics. Berlin, Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 483-519.
  • Bednarek M., 2005. Frames revisited: the coherence-inducing function of frames. Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 37, pp. 685-705. DOI: 10.1016/ j.pragma.2004.09.007.
  • Braun F., 1988. Terms of Address: Problems of Patterns and Usage in Various Languages and Cultures. Berlin, Mouton de Gruyter. 372 p.
  • House J., 1989. Politeness in English and German: The functions of please and bitte. Blum-Kulka Sh.,
  • House J., Kasper G., eds. Cross-cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies. Norwud, N. J., Ablex, pp. 96-119.
  • House J., Kadar D.Z., 2021. Forthcoming. Contrastive Pragmatics. Cambridge, CUP, 2021. (In Print).
  • Ide S., 1989. Formal forms and discernment: Two neglected universals of linguistic politeness. Multilingua, vol. 8, no. 2/3, pp. 223-248.
  • Kadar D.Z., House J., 2020a. Revisiting the duality of convention and ritual: A contrastive pragmatic inquiry. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 83-111. DOI: 10.1515/psicl-2020-003.
  • Kadar D.Z., House J., 2020b. Ritual Frames and politeness markers. Pragmatics and Society, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 641-649. DOI: 10.1075/ ps.18079.kad.
  • Kadar D.Z., House J., 2020c. Ritual Frames: A Contrastive Pragmatics approach. Pragmatics, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 142-168. DOI: 10.1075/prag. 19018.kad.
  • Kecskes I., 2016. "Situation-bound Utterances in Chinese. East Asian Pragmatics, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 107-126. DOI: 10.1558/eap.v1i1.29098.
  • Levinson S., 1992. Activity types and language. Drew P., Heritage J., eds. Talk at work: Interaction in Institutional settings. Cambridge, CUP, pp. 66-100.
  • Tannen D., 2009. Framing and face: The relevance of the presentation of Self to linguistic discourse analysis. Social Psychology Quaterly, vol. 72, no. 4, pp. 300-305.
  • Tannen D., Wallat C., 1987. Interactive frames and knowledge schemas in interaction: Examples from a medical examination/interview. Social Psychology Quaterly, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 205-216.
  • Terkourafi M., 2001. Politeness in Cypriot Greek: A Frame-Based Approach. PhD Thesis. Cambridge, CUP 232 p.
  • Terkourafi M., 2005. Beyond the micro-level of politeness research. Journal of Politeness Research, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 237-262.
  • Watts R., 2003. Politeness. Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Cambridge University Press. 304 p.
Еще
Статья научная