“Smart tuning” as a discourse technology of effective communication (on the material of the coronavirus vaccination media discourse)

Бесплатный доступ

The article offers a solution to the problem of effective communication through the construction of discursive technology that is called the “Smart Tuning” technology(STT). It is positioned as one of the most effective means of achieving results in media discourse. The STT is aimed at identifying cognitive-communicative parameters and linguocognitive mechanisms that enhance the impact. The main methods used in the research include cognitive modeling, inference-driven interpretation and linguoaxiological analysis. One of the hot topics today “coronavirus vaccination” allows us to demonstrate how media discourse is managed through the powers of discourse. The peculiarities are highlighted and the hard, soft and smart discourse powers example analysis is provided. It is proved that the action of each power is based on revealed parameters (the situation attractiveness, the horizon of the addressee's expectations, the communication mode, the strength of the addresser's position, the message attraction, harmonization, modalization, patterning, multimodality, synergy, sense-rhythmic modulations, tension) and is promoted by mechanisms (involvement, defocusing, dialogization, imagining, inspiration, metaphorization, personalization, positioning, reframing, spin-doctoring, focusing, framing). It is shown that, depending on the social status of the addressee, the relationship between the addresser and the addressee, the strength of the addresser's position, the message importance, the most effective discursive power are selected to provide more efficient impact. Such mechanisms as focusing, framing, imagining, positioning were revealed as the most frequent. In the future, it is possible to expand the analysis on the material of other discourse types in other languages.

Еще

Discourse power, parameters, mechanisms, smart tuning, effective communication, vaccination, coronavirus

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/149140537

IDR: 149140537   |   DOI: 10.15688/jvolsu2.2022.3.9

Список литературы “Smart tuning” as a discourse technology of effective communication (on the material of the coronavirus vaccination media discourse)

  • Arutyunova N.D., 1988. Tipy yazykovykh znacheniy: Otsenka. Sobytie. Fakt [Types of Linguistic Values: Assessment. Event. Fact]. Moscow, Nauka Publ. 341 p.
  • Berger P., Luckman T., 1995. Sotsialnoe konstruirovanie realnosti. Traktat po sotsiologii znaniya [Social Construction of Reality. A Treatise on the Sociology of Knowledge]. Moscow, s. n. 323 p.
  • Demyankov V.Z., 2001. Sobytiynost v yazyke sredstv massovoy informatsii [Eventivity in the Language of the Media]. Yazyk sredstv massovoy informatsii kak obyekt mezhdistsiplinarnogo issledovaniya: tez. dokl. Mezhdunar. nauch. konf., filol. f-t MGU im. M.V. Lomonosova (25-27 okt. 2001) [The Language of the Media as an Object of Interdisciplinary Research. Abstracts of the International Scientific Conference, Philology Faculty of Lomonosov Moscow State University (October 25-27, 2001)]. Moscow, Izd. dom Moskov. gos. un-ta, pp. 59-60.
  • Derrida Zh., 1992. Pis'mo yaponskomu drugu [Letter to a Japanese Friend]. Voprosy filosofii [Philosophy Questions], no. 4, pp. 53-57.
  • Dijk T.A. van. 2013. Diskurs i vlast. Reprezentatsiya dominirovaniya v yazyke i kommunikatsii [Discourse and Power. Representation of Dominance in Language and Communication]. Moscow, Librokom Publ. 344 p.
  • Fairclough N.L., 1989. Language and Power. London, Longman. 259 p.
  • Auconnier G., Turner M., 2006. Mental Spaces: Conceptual Integration Networks. Cognitive Linguistics: Basic Readings. Berlin, Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, pp. 303-371.
  • Foucault M., 1996. Volya k istine: po tu storonu znaniya, vlasti i seksual 'nosti. Raboty raznykh let [The Will to Truth: Beyond Knowledge, Power and Sexuality. Works of Different Years]. Moscow, Kastal Publ. 448 p.
  • Haken G., 1980. Sinergetika [Synergetics]. Moscow, Mir Publ. 404 p.
  • Iakoba I.A., 2017. Lingvokognitivnye parametry diskursa v tekhnologii «Umnaya nastroyka» [Linguocognitive Parameters of Discourse in the Smart Tuning Technology]. Irkutsk, Izd. dom. IRNITU. 189 p.
  • Iakoba I.A., 2019a. Aktualizatsiya attraktivizatsii v mediynom reklamnom diskurse [Actualization of Attraction in Media Advertising Discourse]. Teoriya yazyka i mezhkulturnaya kommunikatsiya [Theory of Language and Intercultural Communication], no. 1 (32), pp. 227-235.
  • Iakoba I.A., 2019b. Vneshnie i vnutrennie parametry mediynogo diskursa [External and Internal Parameters of Media Discourse]. Uchenye zapiski Petrozavodskogo gosudarstvennogo unstituta [Scientific Notes of Petrozavodsk State University], no. 3 (180), pp. 94-100.
  • Ilyin V.V., 2005. Aksiologiya [Axiology]. Moscow, MGU. 216 p.
  • Nye J.S., 2004. Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics. New York, Public Affairs Group. 191 p.
  • Phillips L., Jorgensen M.V., 2004. Diskurs-analiz. Teoriya i metod [Discourse Analysis. Theory and Method]. Kharkiv, Gumanitarnyy Tsentr. 336 p.
  • Plotnikova S.N., 2011. Tekhnologizatsiya diskursa v sovremennom obshchestve: kollektiv. monogr. [Technologization of Discourse in Modern Society. Collective Monograph]. Irkutsk, IGLU. 320 p.
  • Serebrennikova E.F., 2013. Aksiologicheskaya parametrizatsiya sotsial'nogo diskursa [Axiological Parametrization of Social Discourse]. Vestnik Irkutskogo gosudarstvennogo lingvisticheskogo universiteta, no. 3 (24), pp. 13-18.
  • Serebrennikova E.F., Shoshin A.A., 2020. Diskurs empatii: ot opredeleniya k vektoram modelirovaniya v mediynom kommunikativnom prostranstve [Discourse of Empathy: From Definition to Vectors of Modeling in the Medical Communicative Space]. Teoriya yazyka i mezhkul'turnaya kommunikatsiya [Theory of Language and Intercultural Communication], no. 2 (37), pp. 243-254.
  • Stepanov Yu.S., 1995. Alternativnyy mir, diskurs, fakt i printsip prichinnosti [Alternative World, Discourse, Fact and the Principle of Causality].
  • Yazyk i nauka kontsa XXveka: sb. st. [Language and Science of the Late Twentieth Century. Collection of Articles]. Moscow, RGGU, pp. 34-72.
  • Tsurganova E.A., 2001. Retseptivnaya kritika [Receptive Criticism]. Nikolyukin A.N., ed. Literaturnaya entsiklopediya terminov i ponyatiy [Literary Encyclopedia of Terms and Concepts]. Moscow, Intelvak Publ., pp. 872-875.
  • Vodak R., 2011. Kriticheskaya lingvistika i kriticheskiy analiz diskursa [Critical Linguistics and Critical Analysis of Discourse]. Politicheskaya lingvistika [Political Linguistics], no. 4 (38), pp. 286-291.
Еще
Статья научная