Современные взгляды на проблему консервации донорского материала в эндотелиальной кератопластике (обзор)

Современные взгляды на проблему консервации донорского материала в эндотелиальной кератопластике (обзор)

Автор: Ибрагимова P.P., Андреев А.Ю., Ян Ю., Ханова А.Н., Гуджокова Д.М.

Журнал: Саратовский научно-медицинский журнал @ssmj

Рубрика: Офтальмология

Статья в выпуске: 4 т.18, 2022 года.

Бесплатный доступ

Цель: провести оценку подходов к заготовке донорского трансплантата в эндотелиальной кератопластике, проанализировать преимущества и недостатки каждого из них. В обзоре представлены работы по задним кератопластикам с предварительно заготовленными трансплантатами современными методами консервации; выборка за последние 16 лет в период с 2006 по 2022 г., публикации доступны к изучению по данным основных научных баз PubMed, eLibrary.ru. В итоговый анализ включены 50 литературных источников. В настоящее время трансплантация десцеметовой мембраны (ДМ) стала золотым стандартом лечения эндотелиальных заболеваний. Данная операция позволяет добиться высоких зрительных функций и является наиболее селективной и патогенетически ориентированной, однако имеет ряд технических недостатков, связанных с заготовкой донорского трансплантата. К данным недостаткам можно отнести длительное время, затраченное на выделение ДМ, высокий риск повреждения и отбраковки дефицитного материала интраоперационно, что требует высоких хирургических навыков. Учитывая изложенное, в клинической практике стали зарождаться подходы к предварительной консервации ДМ, которые компенсируют время в операционной, снижают рискятрогенного повреждения донорского материала

Еще

Консервация роговицы, послойная кератопластика, трансплантация десцеметовой мембраны

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/149142937

IDR: 149142937

Список литературы Современные взгляды на проблему консервации донорского материала в эндотелиальной кератопластике (обзор)

  • Ang M, Mehta JS, Anshu A, et al. Endothelial cell counts after Descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty versus penetrating keratoplasty in Asian eyes. Clin Ophthalmol. 2012; (6): 537–44. DOI: 10.2147 / OPTH.S26343.
  • Ong HS, Ang M, Mehta J. Evolution of therapies for the corneal endothelium: past, present and future approaches. Br J Ophthalmol. 2021; (105): 454–67.
  • Tan D, Mehta J. Future directions in lamellar corneal. Cornea. 2007; (9): 21–8. DOI: 10.1097 / ICO.0b013e31812f685c.
  • Rosa AM, Silva MF, Quadrado MJ, et al. Femtosecond laser and microkeratome-assisted Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty: first clinical results. Br J Ophthalmol. 2013; (97): 1104–7. DOI: 10.1136 / bjophthalmol-2012–302378.
  • Neff KD, Biber JM, Holland EJ. Comparison of central corneal graft thickness to visual acuity outcomes in endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea. 2011; (30): 388–91. DOI: 10.1097 / ICO.0b013e3181f236c6.
  • Patel SV, Baratz KH, Hodge DO, et al. The effect of corneal light scatter on vision after Descemet stripping with endothelial keratoplasty. Arch Ophthalmol. 2009; (127): 153–60. DOI: 10.1001 / archophthalmol.2008.581.
  • Coster DJ, Lowe MT, Keane MC, Williams KA. Comparison of Lamellar and Penetrating Keratoplasty Outcomes: A Registry Study. Ophthalmology. 2014; 121 (5): 979–87. DOI: 10.1016 / j.ophtha.2013.12.017.
  • Malyugin BE, Shilova NF, Anisimova NS, Antonova OP. Endothelial and descemet membrane transplantation. Vestnik oftal’mologii. 2019; 135 (1): 98–103. (In Russ.) Малюгин Б. Э., Шилова Н. Ф., Анисимова Н. С., Антонова O. П. Трансплантация эндотелия и десцеметовой мембраны. Вестник офтальмологии. 2019; 135 (1): 98–103. DOI: 10.17116 / oftalma201913501198.
  • Lie JT, Birbal R, Ham L, et al. Donor tissue treparation for Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008; 34 (9): 1578–83. DOI: 10.1016 / j.jcrs.2008.05.036.
  • Ang M, Sng CCA. Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty and glaucoma. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2018; (29): 178–84. DOI: 10.1097 / ICU.0000000000000454.
  • Price MO, Gupta P, Lass J, Price FW Jr. EK (DLEK, DSEK, DMEK): new frontier in cornea surgery. Annu Rev Vis Sci. 2017; (3): 69–90. DOI: 10.1146 / annurev-vision-102016-061400. PMID: 28697678.
  • Melles GR, Ong TS, Ververs B, et al. Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). Cornea. 2006; (25): 987–90.
  • Terry MA. Endothelial keratoplasty: a comparison of complication rates and endothelial survival between precut tissue and surgeon-cut tissue by a single DSAEK surgeon. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2009; (107): 184–91.
  • Ruzza A, Parekh M, Ferrari S, et al. Preloaded donor corneal lenticules in a new validated 3D printed smart storage glide for Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Br J Ophthalmol. 2015; (99): 1388–95.
  • Palioura S, Colby K. Outcomes of Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty using eye bank-prepared preloaded grafts. Cornea. 2017; (36): 21–5.
  • Newman LR, DeMill DL, Zeidenweber DA, et al. Preloaded Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty donor tissue: surgical technique and early clinical results. Cornea. 2018; 37 (8): 981–6. DOI: 10.1097 / ICO.0000000000001646.
  • Holiman JD, Stoeger CG, Galloway JD, et al. An Eye Bank DMEK tissue preperation program for corneas stored at 4°C. In: Parekh M, Stefano F, Ponzin D, eds. Eye Banking: changing face of corneal transplantation. New York, NY: Nova Biomedical; 2015: р. 123–39.
  • Veldman PB, Dye PK, Holiman JD, et al. Stamping an S on DMEK donor tissue to prevent upside-down grafts: laboratory validation and detailed preparation technique description. Cornea. 2015; (34): 1175–8.
  • Groeneveld-van Beek EA, Lie JT, van der Wees J, et al. Standardized ‘no-touch’ donor tissue preparation for DALK and DMEK: harvesting undamaged anterior and posterior transplants from the same donor cornea. Acta Ophthalmologica. 2013; 91 (2): 145–50. DOI: 10.1111 / j.1755–3768.2012.02462.x.
  • Muraine M, Gueudry J, He Z, et al. Novel technique for the preparation of corneal grafts for Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol. 2013; 156 (5): 851–9. DOI: 10.1016 / j.ajo.2013.05.041.
  • Tenkman L, McKee Y, Price F. DMEK donor preparation: SCUBA technique. The digital manual of ophthalmic surgery and theory: DMEK. Indianapolis, IN: Interactive Medical Publishing; 2014.
  • McCauley MB, Price FW, Price MO. Descemet membrane automated endothelial keratoplasty. Hybrid technique combining DSAEK stability with DMEK visual results. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009; 35 (10): 1659–64. DOI: 10.1016 / j.jcrs.2009.05.034.
  • Studeny P, Farkas A, Vokrojova M, et al. Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty with a stromal rim (DMEKS). Br J Ophthalmol. 2010; 94 (7): 909–14.
  • DeMill DL, Tran KD, Mayko ZM, et al. Frozen, prestripped Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) grafts for surgical training. Int J Eye Banking. 2017; (5): 1–7.
  • Agarwal A, Dua HS, Narang P, et al. Pre-descemet’s endothelial keratoplasty (PDEK). Br J Ophthalmol. 2014; 98 (9): 1181–5. DOI: 10.1136 / bjophthalmol-2013-304639.
  • Dua HS, Faraj LA, Said DG, et al. Human corneal anatomy redefined: a novel pre-Descemet’s layer (Dua’s layer). Ophthalmology. 2013; 120 (9): 1778–85. DOI: 10.1016 / j.ophtha.2013.12.021.
  • Singh NP, Said DG, Dua HS. Lamellar keratoplasty techniques. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2018; (66): 1239–50. DOI: 10.4103 / ijo.IJO_95_18.
  • Szurman P, Januschowski K, Rickmann A, et al. Novel liquid bubble dissection technique for DMEK lenticule preparation. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2016; 254 (9): 1819–23. DOI: 10.1007 / s00417‑016‑3377‑z.
  • Busin M, Bhatt PR, Scorcia V. A modified technique for Descemet membrane stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty to minimize endothelial cell loss. Arch Ophthalmol. 2008; (126): 1133–7. DOI: 10.1001 / archopht.126.8.1133.
  • Busin M, Leon P, Scorcia V, et al. Contact lens-assisted pull-through technique for delivery of tri-folded (endothelium in) DMEK grafts minimizes surgical time and cell loss. Ophthalmology. 2016; (123): 476–83.
  • Davis Boozer DL, Shamie N, Shah AK, Terry MA. Descemet’s membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK): endothelial cell loss resulting from two methods of 112 donor tissue preparation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009; (50): 607.
  • Koizumi N, Okumura N, Ueno M, Kinoshita S. New therapeutic modality for corneal endothelial disease using Rho-associated kinase inhibitor eye drops. Cornea. 2014; 33 Suppl 11: S25–31. DOI: 10.1097 / ICO.0000000000000240.
  • Wolle MA, DeMill DL, Johnson L, et al. Quantitative analysis of endothelial cell loss in preloaded descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty grafts. Cornea. 2017; (36): 1295–301.
  • Tran KD, Dye PK, Odell K, et al. Evaluation and quality assessment of prestripped, preloaded Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty grafts. Cornea. 2017; (36): 484–90.
  • Greiner JV, Glonek T, Korb DR, et al. Corneal cryopreservation using glycerylphosphorylcholine-enriched medium. Cornea. 2020; 39 (3): 370–5. DOI: 10.1097 / ICO.0000000000002214.
  • Sales CS, Terry MA, Veldman PB, et al. Relationship between tissue unscrolling time and endothelial cell loss. Cornea. 2016; (35): 471–6.
  • Hooton J, Kim KH, Lentz SI, et al. Safety of long-term storage and shipping of prestripped, prestained, and preloaded descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty tissue. Cornea. 2019; 38 (8): 1023–8. DOI: 10.1097 / ICO.0000000000001974.
  • Solar SJ, Deljookorani S, Wiener BG, et al. Preloading trifolded grafts for Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty affects scroll formation. Cornea. 2020; 39 (8): 1062–5. DOI: 10.1097 / ICO.0000000000002298.
  • Rickmann A, Wahl S, Katsen-Globa, et al. Safety analysis and results of a borosilicate glass cartridge for no-touch graft loading and injection in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Int Ophthalmol. 2019; (39): 2295–301.
  • Yoeruek E, Bartz-Schmidt KU, Hofmann J. Impact of the radius of the injector system on the cell viability in Descemet membrane endothelial. Acta Ophthalmol. 2016; (94): e1–5.
  • Parekh M, Ruzza A, Ferrari S, et al. Endothelium-in versus endothelium-out for Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty graft preparation and implantation. Acta Ophthalmol. 2017; 95 (2): 194–8. DOI: 10.1111 / aos.13162.
  • Ang M, Saroj L, Htoon HM, et al. Comparison of a donor insertion device to sheets glide in Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty: 3‑year outcomes. Am J Ophthalmol. 2014; (157): 1163–9 e3. DOI: 10.1016 / j.ajo.2014.02.049.
  • Kim EC, Bonfadini G, Todd L, et al. Simple, inexpensive, and effective injector for Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea. 2014; (33): 649–52.
  • Romano V, Parekh M, Ruzza A, et al. Comparison of preservation and transportation protocols for preloaded Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Br J Ophthalmol. 2018; (102): 549–55.
  • Feng MT, Burkhart ZN, Price FW, et al. Effect of donor preparation-to-use times on Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty outcomes. Cornea. 2013; (32): 1080–2.
  • Deng SX, Sanchez PJ, Chen L. Clinical outcomes of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty using eye bankprepared tissues. Am J Ophthalmol. 2015; (159): 590–6.
  • Kobayashi A, Yokogawa H, Sugiyama K. Clinical results of the Neusidl Corneal Inserter (®), a new donor inserter for Descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty, for small Asian eyes. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2012; (43): 311–8. DOI: 10.3928 / 15428877‑20120426‑04.
  • Ong HS, Htoon HM, Ang M, Mehta JS. “Endothelium- Out” and “Endothelium-In” Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) graft insertion techniques: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022; ( 9): 868533. DOI: 10.3389 / fmed.2022.868533.
  • Khoa DT, Philip KD, Odell K, et al. Evaluation and quality assessment of prestripped, preloaded Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty grafts. Cornea. 2017; (36): 484–90.
  • Borzenok SA, Malyugin BE Komah YA. Corneal donation as a key problem in keratoplasty: textbook for teachers, physicians, residents, and postgraduate medical students. Moscow: Ophthalmology Publishing House, 2020; 52 р. (In Russ.) Борзенок С. А., Малюгин Б. Э., Комах Ю. А. Донорство роговиц — ключевая проблема кератопластики: учеб. пособие для педагогов, врачей, ординаторов и аспирантов медвузов. М.: ООО «Издательство Офтальмология», 2020; 52 с.
Еще
Статья научная
QR-код для установки приложения SciUp Наведите камеру и скачайте бесплатное приложение SciUp