Тезисный обзор материалов Европейского конгресса радиологов 2012

Автор: Рожкова Надежда Ивановна, Решетцова Галина Викторовна, Прокопенко Сергей Павлович

Журнал: Вестник Российского научного центра рентгенорадиологии Минздрава России @vestnik-rncrr

Рубрика: Обзоры

Статья в выпуске: 4 т.12, 2012 года.

Бесплатный доступ

В данной статье приведен краткий обзор материалов Европейского конгресса радиологов 2012 по разделу маммологии, отражающий состояние дел в европейской радиологии на текущий момент.

Рак молочной железы, маммография, томосинтез, интервенционная радиология

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/14955362

IDR: 14955362

Список литературы Тезисный обзор материалов Европейского конгресса радиологов 2012

  • “Insights into Imaging”/ECR 2012 Book of Abstracts/Volume 3/Supplement 1/March 2012:
  • N.M.M.R. AlRashidi, G Waiter, T. Ahearn, F.J. Gilbert, T.W. Redpath. The influence of hormonal fluctuations on quantitative diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) of the glandular breast tissue in healthy premenopausal participants at 3 T./S155.
  • M.Teleska, F. Pediconi, M.Kuciani, F.Vasselli, V.Casali. Accuracy of 3 T magnetic resonans imaging with a high-relaxivity contrast agent in assessing treatment response in patients undergoing noeadjuvant therapy./S155.
  • P.A.T.Baltzer, W.A.Kaiser, H.P.Burmeister, M.Dietzel. MR-mammography at 3 T in clinical practice: prospective single center experience./S155.
  • R.M.Trimboli, N.Verardi, L.A.carbonaro, F.cartia, G Di Leo, F.Sardanelli. Back to the future: non-contrast breast MRI (nc-BMRI) using a combination of T1-weighted, diffusion-weighted and STIR imaging./S155-156.
  • F.Pedicani, M.Telesca, M.Luciani, F.Vasselli, V.Casali, E.Miglio, C.Catalano. Breast MRI at 3 T: a pilot study estimating sensitivity and specificity of unenhanced MRI (DWI combined with T2 IDEAL sequence) vs CE-MRI in the assessment of response to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy./S156.
  • M.Lorenzon, C.Zuiani, A.Linda, S.De Stefani, M.Maieron, R.Girometti, M.Bazzocchi. To contrast or not to contrast? A new approach to unenhanced MR mammography./S156.
  • C.Caborni, C.Losio, P.Panizza, E.Venturini, F.De Cobelli, A. Del Maschio. A comparison between FAST technique and standard breast MRI: are we ready for MR screening?./S156.
  • C.C.Riedl, N.Luft, C.B.Bernhart, G.Heinz-Peer, K.Pinker, T.H.Helbich. Subgroup analysis of the final results of the Austrian screening trial for familiar breast cancer/S156-157.
  • A.Napoli, F.Pediconi, M.Anzidei. L.Di Mare, G.cartocci, L.Bertaccini, F.Doni, V.Noce, C.Catalano. Treatment of invasive breast cancer: initial clinical experience using high intensive focused ultrasound therapy with 3T marnetic resonance guidance/S157.
  • E.M.Fallenberg, M.krohn, J.Foerster, H.Wieber, J.M.Singh, F.Diekmann, U.Bick. Comtrast-enhanced spectral mammography versus MRI in tumour size assessment: initial results/S185.
  • R.Schulz-Wendtland, M.Meier-Meitinger, M.Heinz, B.Adamietz, M.Uder, S.Schwab. Pilot study for the detection of simulated lesions at a 2D resp. 3D digital full-field digital mammography system with a new developed full-field digital detector on the base of two shifts of a-Se/S158.
  • C.-P.Wallner, M.Hittinger, M.Koerner, U.Linsenmaier, M.Reiser. Digital mammography with a new needle-based detector system: clinical results after a one-year trial/S185-186.
  • F.Engelken, I.Sack, D.Klatt, T.Fisher, E.fallenberg, F.Diekmann. Tomosynthesis elastography: evaluation of a novel elastohraphy technique on simulated tumors in breast-mimicking phantoms/S186.
  • M.Sklair-Levi, T.Sella, M.Cohen, M.Rosin, T.Allweis, M.Shapiro, E.Libson, D.Izhaki. Functional infrared imaging of the breast: automatic breast cancer detector using multiparametric computer analysis/S186.
  • J.W.Hugg, M.K.O’Connor, C.B.Hruska, A.L.Weinmann, A.L.Conners, D.J.Rhodes, F.P.DiFilippo, B.E.Patt. Molecilar breast imaging (MBI) dose lowered to mach mammography: potential for screening dense breasts/S186.
  • G.Zographos, D.Koulocheri, P.Liakou, P.Prigiripoulos, M.Sofras, S.Hadjiagapis, V.Marmarelis. Non-invasive differentiation of small breast lesions via 3D MT imaging/S187.
  • S.Nakano, K.Fujii, K.Yorozuay, M.Yoshida, J.Kousaka, Y.Shiomi, T.Fukutomi, T.Ischiguchi, O.Arai. Fusion of US and FDG-PET/CT image for evaluation of loco-regional recurrence of breast cancer using real time sonography (RVS): first experience/S178.
  • F.J.Gilbert, H.C.van den Bosch, A.Petrillo, K.Siegmann,.J.T.Heverhagen, S.Corcione, M.Faivre-Pierret, C.M.Zecnmann, L.Martincich. Influence of breast parenchyma density on malignant lesions detection with gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MRI compared to mammography and ultrasound/S187.
  • V.Girardi, M.Tonegutti, E.Manfrin, F.Bonetti. Additional breast ultrasonography (US) to negative mammography: impact on cancer detection and invasive assessment rate/S208.
  • S.Weigel, W.Heindel, C.Biesheuvel. Diagnostic assessment of digital mammography screening:evidence on incremental breast cancer detection by bilateral ultrasound examination/S208.
  • V.Girardi, M.Tonegutti, E.Manfrin, F.Bonetti. Additional breast ultrasonography (US) to negative mammography: are there risk categories that benefit more then others?/S209.
  • T.A.Fassaert, I.J.M.Dubelaar, M.D.F.de Jong, G.J.Jager, M.J.C.M.Rutten. Lesion detection in 3D-automated breast volume scans (ABVS): correlation with breast MRI/S209.
  • H.Kang, S.Kim, B.Kang. Automated whole breast ultrasound: radiologist’s detection performance and interobserver variability/S209.
  • F.Chamming’s, H.Lattorre, V.Fitoussi, M.-A.Le Frere-Belda, L.Pidial, J.-L.Gennisson, C.-A.Cuenod, O.Clements, L.S.Fournier. What is pathology underlying stiffness? Ultrasound elastography of a human breast cancer model, with pathological correlation/S209.
  • F.K.W.Schaefer, W.Berg, D.Cosgrove, J.Gay, M.S.Henry, O.Wolf, C.Cohen-Bacrie. SherWave-elastography worldwide breast trial model -can additional SWE-features support downgrading BI-RADS 3 to BI-RADS 2 ?/S290.
  • L.C.H.Leong, L.S.Sim, S.M.C.Fook-Chong, A.R.Jara-Lazaro, P.H.Tan. Lesion characteristics and histopathological factors affecting diagnostic performance of breast ultrasound elastography/S210.
  • G.Gennaro, E.Bezzon, E.Baldan, R.Chersevani, C.de Maggio, M.La Grassa, L.Pescarini, I.Polico, A.Poietti. Specificity: digital breast tomosynthesis versus mammography/S238.
  • J.Giglio, G.Ghione, E.Regini, M.Durando, A.Luparia, M.C.Eandi, P.P.Campanino, G.Maroscotti, G.Gandini. MRI in the pre-operative breast cancer staging before and after the introduction of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT): has anything changed?/S238.
  • P.Martinez, A.Garcia-Lallana, R.Sainz-Mendiguren, C.Minguillon, L.Pina. The role of breast tomosynthesis combined with digital mammography/S238.
  • B.Raghavan, M.Rajmohan, G.Sivaramalingam. Role of breast tomosynthesis in the morphological analysis of breast lesions/S238.
  • N.Y.Said, H.Abol Magd, M.Mokhtar, L.Bassam, S.Waheed, D.Salem, A.Selim. Does combining 3D breast tomosynthesis with digital mammography improve diagnostic accuracy?/S238.
  • J.Timmers, G. de Heeten, E.M.Adang, J.D.Otten, A.L.M.Verbeek, M.J.M.Broeders. Dutch digital breast cancer screening: implications for breast cancer/S239.
  • J.Nederend, A.C.Voogd, J.H.Groenewoud, M.W.J.Louwman, L.E.M.Duijm. Dramatic increase in stereotactic core biopsy rate and ductal carcinoma in-situ detection after conversion from analogue to digital screening mammography/S239.
  • J.Nederend, M.W.J.Louwman, J.H.Groenewoud, A.C.Voogd, L.E.M.Duijim. Conversion from analogue to digital screening mammography results in a more favorable tumor stage and tumor biology of screen-detected cancers/S239.
  • S.Hofvind, C.I.Lee, J.G.Elmore. What do we gain by changing from screen film to full field digital mammographic screening?/S329.
  • V.van Breest Smallenburg, J.Nederend, E.G.Klompenhouwer, L.E.M.Duijm. Variations in screening outcome among pairs of radiologists at independent double reading of screening mammograms: a population-based study/S260.
  • R.Lederman, I.Leichter, M.Greenberg. Presorting by CAD according to lesion tipe: increasing the reader’s awareness of mammographic lesions in a screening environment/S262.
  • R.Lederman, I.Leichter, M.Greenberg. Can CAD be used as a preliminary reader in screening mammography?/S262.
  • N.Karssemeijer, R.Hupse, M.Samulski, M.Lobbes, A.den Heeten. Standalone computer-aided detection compared to en readers for the detection ob breast cancer in screening mammograms/S262.
  • S.Allen, M.Alvares-Benito. Multicentre cooperative study of the effectiveness of the fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) of axillary lymph nodes under sonographic guidance in the pre-treatment management of breast cancer patients: results after 792 consecutive cancer cases/S288.
  • K.A.Taylor, M.G.Wallis, J.Foreman, P.D.Britton. Staging the axilla with ultrasound and biopsy: maximizing diagnostic yield whilst minimising unnecessary biopsy/S289.
  • M.G.Wallis, S.Cheung, P.D.Britton, O.Kearins. Pre-operative staging of the axilla: UK audit of screen detected breast cancer 2008/9 and 2009/10/S289.
  • A.Villa, F.Chiesa, I.Rosenberg, M.Calabrese. Management of flat epithelial atypia diagnosed at vacuum-assisted breast biopsy performed on suspicious microcalcifications/S289.
  • S.H.Heywang-Koebrunner, J.Naehrig, H.Hfler, A.Hacker, S.Sedlacek, N.Hintermeier. Accuracy of minimal invasive breast biopsy in an incipient screening program: analysis of 2477 consecutive percutaneous interventions/S289.
  • A.E.Corr, D.M.Duke, N.Hambly, J.D.Cunningham. Is image-guided biopsy always necessary in women under 30 years with solid, palpable breast masses?/S289.
  • R.M.Tromboli, E.Gombos, D.Sippo, I.Fernandez, S.Raza. Incidence of cancer in consecutive negative core needle breast biopsy cases submitted to surgery/S290.
  • S.Kapsimalakou, A.Waldmann, A.Katalinic, I.Grande-Nagel, A.Kovacs, P.Hunold, S.Hollmann, J.Barkhausen, F.M.Vodt. Stereotectically guided vacuum assisted breast biopsy: diagnostic reliability and complication rate/S290.
Еще
Статья обзорная