Тезисный обзор материалов Европейского конгресса радиологов 2012

Рожкова Надежда Ивановна Решетцова Галина Викторовна Прокопенко Сергей Павлович

Журнал: Вестник Российского научного центра рентгенорадиологии Минздрава России @vestnik-rncrr

Рубрика: Обзоры

Статья в выпуске: 4 т.12, 2012 года.

Бесплатный доступ

В данной статье приведен краткий обзор материалов Европейского конгресса радиологов 2012 по разделу маммологии, отражающий состояние дел в европейской радиологии на текущий момент.

рак молочной железы \ маммография \ томосинтез \ интервенционная радиология

Похожие статьи в разделе Патология сердечно-сосудистой системы. Сердечно-сосудистые заболевания

Радиология в маммологии - тезисный обзор материалов Европейского конгресса радиологов 2010
Радиология в маммологии - тезисный обзор материалов Европейского конгресса радиологов 2010

Рожкова Надежда Ивановна, Решетцова Галина Викторовна, Прокопенко Сергей Павлович

Развитие метода электроимпедансной томографии в маммологии
Развитие метода электроимпедансной томографии в маммологии

Киреева М.Н., Солодкий Владимир Алексеевич, Рожкова Надежда Ивановна, Ермощенкова Мария Владимировна

Рентгеновская маммография в диагностике рака молочной железы
Рентгеновская маммография в диагностике рака молочной железы

Борисова Мария Сергеевна, Мартынова Н.В., Богданов С.Н.

Ультразвуковое исследование кистозных образований молочной железы
Ультразвуковое исследование кистозных образований молочной железы

Турсунова С., Хакимов Н.С., Рашидова Ш.У., Рахимова К.М.

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/14955362

IDS: 14955362

Survey of the materials from European congress of radiology 2012

The article gives a short survey of the materials from ECR 2012 concerning the latest works in breast imaging from all over the Europe. It helps to understand what modern Radiology is like now – its present state and plans for future.

Список литературы Тезисный обзор материалов Европейского конгресса радиологов 2012

  • “Insights into Imaging”/ECR 2012 Book of Abstracts/Volume 3/Supplement 1/March 2012:
  • N.M.M.R. AlRashidi, G Waiter, T. Ahearn, F.J. Gilbert, T.W. Redpath. The influence of hormonal fluctuations on quantitative diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) of the glandular breast tissue in healthy premenopausal participants at 3 T./S155.
  • M.Teleska, F. Pediconi, M.Kuciani, F.Vasselli, V.Casali. Accuracy of 3 T magnetic resonans imaging with a high-relaxivity contrast agent in assessing treatment response in patients undergoing noeadjuvant therapy./S155.
  • P.A.T.Baltzer, W.A.Kaiser, H.P.Burmeister, M.Dietzel. MR-mammography at 3 T in clinical practice: prospective single center experience./S155.
  • R.M.Trimboli, N.Verardi, L.A.carbonaro, F.cartia, G Di Leo, F.Sardanelli. Back to the future: non-contrast breast MRI (nc-BMRI) using a combination of T1-weighted, diffusion-weighted and STIR imaging./S155-156.
  • F.Pedicani, M.Telesca, M.Luciani, F.Vasselli, V.Casali, E.Miglio, C.Catalano. Breast MRI at 3 T: a pilot study estimating sensitivity and specificity of unenhanced MRI (DWI combined with T2 IDEAL sequence) vs CE-MRI in the assessment of response to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy./S156.
  • M.Lorenzon, C.Zuiani, A.Linda, S.De Stefani, M.Maieron, R.Girometti, M.Bazzocchi. To contrast or not to contrast? A new approach to unenhanced MR mammography./S156.
  • C.Caborni, C.Losio, P.Panizza, E.Venturini, F.De Cobelli, A. Del Maschio. A comparison between FAST technique and standard breast MRI: are we ready for MR screening?./S156.
  • C.C.Riedl, N.Luft, C.B.Bernhart, G.Heinz-Peer, K.Pinker, T.H.Helbich. Subgroup analysis of the final results of the Austrian screening trial for familiar breast cancer/S156-157.
  • A.Napoli, F.Pediconi, M.Anzidei. L.Di Mare, G.cartocci, L.Bertaccini, F.Doni, V.Noce, C.Catalano. Treatment of invasive breast cancer: initial clinical experience using high intensive focused ultrasound therapy with 3T marnetic resonance guidance/S157.
  • E.M.Fallenberg, M.krohn, J.Foerster, H.Wieber, J.M.Singh, F.Diekmann, U.Bick. Comtrast-enhanced spectral mammography versus MRI in tumour size assessment: initial results/S185.
  • R.Schulz-Wendtland, M.Meier-Meitinger, M.Heinz, B.Adamietz, M.Uder, S.Schwab. Pilot study for the detection of simulated lesions at a 2D resp. 3D digital full-field digital mammography system with a new developed full-field digital detector on the base of two shifts of a-Se/S158.
  • C.-P.Wallner, M.Hittinger, M.Koerner, U.Linsenmaier, M.Reiser. Digital mammography with a new needle-based detector system: clinical results after a one-year trial/S185-186.
  • F.Engelken, I.Sack, D.Klatt, T.Fisher, E.fallenberg, F.Diekmann. Tomosynthesis elastography: evaluation of a novel elastohraphy technique on simulated tumors in breast-mimicking phantoms/S186.
  • M.Sklair-Levi, T.Sella, M.Cohen, M.Rosin, T.Allweis, M.Shapiro, E.Libson, D.Izhaki. Functional infrared imaging of the breast: automatic breast cancer detector using multiparametric computer analysis/S186.
  • J.W.Hugg, M.K.O’Connor, C.B.Hruska, A.L.Weinmann, A.L.Conners, D.J.Rhodes, F.P.DiFilippo, B.E.Patt. Molecilar breast imaging (MBI) dose lowered to mach mammography: potential for screening dense breasts/S186.
  • G.Zographos, D.Koulocheri, P.Liakou, P.Prigiripoulos, M.Sofras, S.Hadjiagapis, V.Marmarelis. Non-invasive differentiation of small breast lesions via 3D MT imaging/S187.
  • S.Nakano, K.Fujii, K.Yorozuay, M.Yoshida, J.Kousaka, Y.Shiomi, T.Fukutomi, T.Ischiguchi, O.Arai. Fusion of US and FDG-PET/CT image for evaluation of loco-regional recurrence of breast cancer using real time sonography (RVS): first experience/S178.
  • F.J.Gilbert, H.C.van den Bosch, A.Petrillo, K.Siegmann,.J.T.Heverhagen, S.Corcione, M.Faivre-Pierret, C.M.Zecnmann, L.Martincich. Influence of breast parenchyma density on malignant lesions detection with gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MRI compared to mammography and ultrasound/S187.
  • V.Girardi, M.Tonegutti, E.Manfrin, F.Bonetti. Additional breast ultrasonography (US) to negative mammography: impact on cancer detection and invasive assessment rate/S208.
  • S.Weigel, W.Heindel, C.Biesheuvel. Diagnostic assessment of digital mammography screening:evidence on incremental breast cancer detection by bilateral ultrasound examination/S208.
  • V.Girardi, M.Tonegutti, E.Manfrin, F.Bonetti. Additional breast ultrasonography (US) to negative mammography: are there risk categories that benefit more then others?/S209.
  • T.A.Fassaert, I.J.M.Dubelaar, M.D.F.de Jong, G.J.Jager, M.J.C.M.Rutten. Lesion detection in 3D-automated breast volume scans (ABVS): correlation with breast MRI/S209.
  • H.Kang, S.Kim, B.Kang. Automated whole breast ultrasound: radiologist’s detection performance and interobserver variability/S209.
  • F.Chamming’s, H.Lattorre, V.Fitoussi, M.-A.Le Frere-Belda, L.Pidial, J.-L.Gennisson, C.-A.Cuenod, O.Clements, L.S.Fournier. What is pathology underlying stiffness? Ultrasound elastography of a human breast cancer model, with pathological correlation/S209.
  • F.K.W.Schaefer, W.Berg, D.Cosgrove, J.Gay, M.S.Henry, O.Wolf, C.Cohen-Bacrie. SherWave-elastography worldwide breast trial model -can additional SWE-features support downgrading BI-RADS 3 to BI-RADS 2 ?/S290.
  • L.C.H.Leong, L.S.Sim, S.M.C.Fook-Chong, A.R.Jara-Lazaro, P.H.Tan. Lesion characteristics and histopathological factors affecting diagnostic performance of breast ultrasound elastography/S210.
  • G.Gennaro, E.Bezzon, E.Baldan, R.Chersevani, C.de Maggio, M.La Grassa, L.Pescarini, I.Polico, A.Poietti. Specificity: digital breast tomosynthesis versus mammography/S238.
  • J.Giglio, G.Ghione, E.Regini, M.Durando, A.Luparia, M.C.Eandi, P.P.Campanino, G.Maroscotti, G.Gandini. MRI in the pre-operative breast cancer staging before and after the introduction of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT): has anything changed?/S238.
  • P.Martinez, A.Garcia-Lallana, R.Sainz-Mendiguren, C.Minguillon, L.Pina. The role of breast tomosynthesis combined with digital mammography/S238.
  • B.Raghavan, M.Rajmohan, G.Sivaramalingam. Role of breast tomosynthesis in the morphological analysis of breast lesions/S238.
  • N.Y.Said, H.Abol Magd, M.Mokhtar, L.Bassam, S.Waheed, D.Salem, A.Selim. Does combining 3D breast tomosynthesis with digital mammography improve diagnostic accuracy?/S238.
  • J.Timmers, G. de Heeten, E.M.Adang, J.D.Otten, A.L.M.Verbeek, M.J.M.Broeders. Dutch digital breast cancer screening: implications for breast cancer/S239.
  • J.Nederend, A.C.Voogd, J.H.Groenewoud, M.W.J.Louwman, L.E.M.Duijm. Dramatic increase in stereotactic core biopsy rate and ductal carcinoma in-situ detection after conversion from analogue to digital screening mammography/S239.
  • J.Nederend, M.W.J.Louwman, J.H.Groenewoud, A.C.Voogd, L.E.M.Duijim. Conversion from analogue to digital screening mammography results in a more favorable tumor stage and tumor biology of screen-detected cancers/S239.
  • S.Hofvind, C.I.Lee, J.G.Elmore. What do we gain by changing from screen film to full field digital mammographic screening?/S329.
  • V.van Breest Smallenburg, J.Nederend, E.G.Klompenhouwer, L.E.M.Duijm. Variations in screening outcome among pairs of radiologists at independent double reading of screening mammograms: a population-based study/S260.
  • R.Lederman, I.Leichter, M.Greenberg. Presorting by CAD according to lesion tipe: increasing the reader’s awareness of mammographic lesions in a screening environment/S262.
  • R.Lederman, I.Leichter, M.Greenberg. Can CAD be used as a preliminary reader in screening mammography?/S262.
  • N.Karssemeijer, R.Hupse, M.Samulski, M.Lobbes, A.den Heeten. Standalone computer-aided detection compared to en readers for the detection ob breast cancer in screening mammograms/S262.
  • S.Allen, M.Alvares-Benito. Multicentre cooperative study of the effectiveness of the fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) of axillary lymph nodes under sonographic guidance in the pre-treatment management of breast cancer patients: results after 792 consecutive cancer cases/S288.
  • K.A.Taylor, M.G.Wallis, J.Foreman, P.D.Britton. Staging the axilla with ultrasound and biopsy: maximizing diagnostic yield whilst minimising unnecessary biopsy/S289.
  • M.G.Wallis, S.Cheung, P.D.Britton, O.Kearins. Pre-operative staging of the axilla: UK audit of screen detected breast cancer 2008/9 and 2009/10/S289.
  • A.Villa, F.Chiesa, I.Rosenberg, M.Calabrese. Management of flat epithelial atypia diagnosed at vacuum-assisted breast biopsy performed on suspicious microcalcifications/S289.
  • S.H.Heywang-Koebrunner, J.Naehrig, H.Hfler, A.Hacker, S.Sedlacek, N.Hintermeier. Accuracy of minimal invasive breast biopsy in an incipient screening program: analysis of 2477 consecutive percutaneous interventions/S289.
  • A.E.Corr, D.M.Duke, N.Hambly, J.D.Cunningham. Is image-guided biopsy always necessary in women under 30 years with solid, palpable breast masses?/S289.
  • R.M.Tromboli, E.Gombos, D.Sippo, I.Fernandez, S.Raza. Incidence of cancer in consecutive negative core needle breast biopsy cases submitted to surgery/S290.
  • S.Kapsimalakou, A.Waldmann, A.Katalinic, I.Grande-Nagel, A.Kovacs, P.Hunold, S.Hollmann, J.Barkhausen, F.M.Vodt. Stereotectically guided vacuum assisted breast biopsy: diagnostic reliability and complication rate/S290.
Еще