The autonomy-focused approach in higher education: theoretical grounds and practical implications

Бесплатный доступ

Introduction: based on the analysis of both the current practice and theory of autonomy in education, this paper is intended to determine the core principles, conditions and practical opportunities for implementation of the autonomy-focused approach in Russian universities. Materials and Methods: to substantiate the benefits and reveal the core characteristics of the autonomy-focused approach in higher education, we performed the content-analysis of both national and international higher educational documents. The practical aspects of the autonomy-focused approach have been examined through applying the ideas of autonomy-focused education to the introduction of the G-MedEx international networking educational programme (the G-Med Ex Programme) at Professor V. F. Voino-Yasenetsky Krasnoyarsk State Medical University in 2015-2016. Analysis of the educational process outcomes and open discussions with teachers and students-participants of the G-MedEx Programme have also become an important source of information. Results: it was revealed that the development of the university educational environment actors' autonomy is possible though the use of the autonomy-focused approach, which represents a critical tool for implementation of the personality-centred educational paradigm. Among the core characteristics of the autonomy-focused approach in higher education we suggested the principles of innovative self-change, personal involvement and self-fulfillment, critical awareness and self-reflection, readiness to face challenges, interdisciplinary character of training, and practical focus of education. Investigating the practical aspects of the autonomy-focused approach, we demonstrated its benefits using the example of an international networking educational programme. Discussion and Conclusions: the results of the implementation of the autonomy-focused approach within the G-MedEx Programme suggest that using this approach is beneficial for both medical university students' and teachers' autonomy development. Practical relevance of the study is ensured through specifying the core principles, conditions and opportunities for implementation of the autonomy-focused approach in higher education, therefore allowing for possible application of the described approach in various universities and providing a basis for investigating its potential in other educational contexts.

Еще

Higher education, university educational environment, university teacher, teacher autonomy, learner autonomy, autonomy-focused approach, autonomous activity, international networking educational programme, professional development

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/147137214

IDR: 147137214   |   DOI: 10.15507/1991-9468.088.021.201703.360-370

Список литературы The autonomy-focused approach in higher education: theoretical grounds and practical implications

  • Тарева Е. Г. Развитие лингвообразовательных практик: оптимистичная проекция//Вестник Московского городского педагогического университета. Сер.: Филология. Теория языка. Языковое образование. 2015. Т. 2, №> 18. С. 75-85. URL: https://www.mgpu.ru/uploads/adv_documents/2801/1485870098-VestnikFilologiya2(18)2015.Pdf (дата обращения: 20.04.2017).
  • Rivas L. T. S., Cano M. G., Austria F. M. M. Need for developing human capital management in SMEs//European Scientific Journal. 2013. No. l. Pp. 225-230. URL: http://eujournal.org/index.php/esj/article/viewFile/1249/1258 (дата обращения: 20.04. 2017).
  • Aloni N. The fundamental commitments of educators//Ethics and Education. 2008. Vol. 3, no. 2. Pp. 149-159 DOI: 10.1080/17449640802410528
  • Khatib M., Hamidi H., Sarem S. N. Humanistic education: Concerns, implications and applications//Journal of Language Teaching and Research. 2013. Vol. 4, no. 1. Pp. 45-51 DOI: 10.4304/jltr.4.1.45-51
  • Mishra C. Humanistic approach to education//Journal of NELTA. 2000. Vol. 5, no. 2. Pp. 25-29 DOI: 10.1207ls15326985
  • Слободчиков В. И. Психология становления и развития человека в образовании//Вестник СПбГУ. Сер. 16: Психология. Педагогика. 2016. №2 1. С. 100-108. URL: http://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/psihologiya-stanovleniya-i-razvitiya-cheloveka-v-obrazovanii-doklad (дата обращения: 20.04.2017).
  • Асмолов А. Г., Шехтер Е. Д., Черноризов А. М. От организма как целого к персонифицированному сообществу: трансформация самоорганизации в социобиологии//Психологические исследования. 2018. Т. 9, № 48. C. 2. URL: http://psystudy.ru/index.php/eng/2016v9n48e/1316-asmolov 48e.html (дата обращения: 22.04.2017).
  • Загвязинский В. И. Актуальные проблемы развития отечественного образования//Вестник Тюменского государственного университета. Педагогика, психология. 2014. № 9. С. 7-16. URL: http://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/aktualnye-problemy-razvitiya-otechestvennogo-obrazovaniya (дата обращения: 23.04.2017).
  • Зеер Е. Ф. Профессиональное развитие личности в образовательном процессе//Управление персоналом и интеллектуальными ресурсами в России. 2013. Т. 2, № 5. С. 3-7. URL: http://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=20409327 (дата обращения: 22.04.2017).
  • Zhang L., Atkin C. Conceptualizing humanistic competence in the language classroom by TJP -A Chinese case//International Education Studies. 2010. Vol. 3, no. 4. Pp. 121-127. URL: http://eric. ed.gov/?id=EJ1065864 (дата обращения: 22.04.2017).
  • Газман О. С. От авторитарного образования к педагогике свободы//Новые ценности образования. 1995. № 2. С. 16-45. URL: http://www.studfiles.ru/preview/2977308 (дата обращения: 22.04.2017).
  • Самойличенко Н. В. К вопросу о свободе в педагогическом взаимодействии//Вопросы педагогического образования. 2003. Вып. 14. С. 91-97.
  • PirrieA., Thoutenhoofd E.D.Learning to learn in the European reference framework for lifelong learning//Oxford Review of Education. 2013. Vol. 39, no. 5. Pp. 609-626 DOI: 10.1080/03054985.2013.840280
  • Gavrilyuk O. A. Understanding university teacher autonomy as a mainspring of reforming higher education//Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences. 2013. Vol. 6, no. 2. Pp. 1800-1815.URL: http://elib.sfu-kras.ru/bitstream/handle/2311/10118/06_Gavrilyuk.pdf;jsessionid=96E 759DDB77ED39333B79477F438D424?sequence=1 (дата обращения: 20.04.2017).
  • Ryan R. M., Deci E. L. Self-regulation and the problem of human autonomy: Does psychology need choice, self-determination, and will?//Journal of Personality. 2006. Vol. 74, no. 6. Pp. 1557-1585 DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2006.00420.x
  • Kopcha T. J., Rieber L. P., Walker B. B. Understanding university faculty perceptions about innovation in teaching and technology//British Journal of Educational Technology. 2016. Vol. 47, no. 5. Pp. 945-957 DOI: 10.1111/bjet.12361
  • Кульневич С. В. От стратегии самоорганизации к тактике личностного воспитания//Известия Южного отд. РАО. 2000. Вып. 2. С. 13-24. URL: http://uchebauchenyh.narod.ru/stat/ot_strat.htm (дата обращения: 10.04.2017).
  • The relationship between teacher's autonomy support and students' autonomy and vitality/J.L. Nunez //Teachers and Teaching. 2015. Vol. 21, no. 2. Pp. 191-202 DOI: 10.1080/13540602.2014.928127
  • Gavrilyuk O. A. Autonomy as a core value of lifelong learning//Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences. 2015. Vol. 8, no. 11. Pp. 2283-2290. URL: http://elib.sfu-kras.ru/bitstream/handle/2311/19879/14Gavrilyuk.pdf?sequence=3 (дата обращения: 22.04.2017).
  • AlAsmariA. Practices and prospects of learner autonomy: Teachers Perceptions//English Language Teaching. 2013. Vol. 6, no. 3. Pp. 1-10 DOI: 10.5539/elt.v6n3p1
  • Cakici D. An investigation of learner autonomy in Turkish EFL context//International Journal of Higher Education. 2017. Vol. 6, no. 2. Pp. 89-99 DOI: 10.5430/ijhe.v6n2p89
  • Godwin-Jones R. Autonomous language learning//Language Learning & Technology. 2015. Vol. 15, no. 13. Pp. 4-11. URL: http://llt.msu.edu/issues/october2011/emerging.pdf (дата обращения: 20.04.2017).
  • Han L. Teacher's role in developing learner autonomy: A literature review//International Journal of English Language Teaching. 2014. Vol. 1, no. 2. Pp. 21-27 DOI: 10.5430/ijelt.v1n2p21
  • Hyungshim J., Reeve J. A New autonomy-supportive way of teaching that increases conceptual learning: Teaching in students' preferred ways//The Journal of Experimental Education. 2016. Vol. 84, no. 4. Pp. 686-701 DOI: 10.1080/00220973.2015.1083522
  • Jungert T. Science adjustment, parental and teacher autonomy support and the cognitive orientation of science students//An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology. 2015. Vol. 35, no. 3. Pp. 361-376 DOI: 10.1080/01443410.2013.828826
  • Marandi S. S., Sadaghian S. A shift into autonomous education//Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning. 2016. No. 17. URL: http://elt.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_4961_d6d88774bfbc2866cf2b97 f58c8e2038.pdf (дата обращения: 20.04.2017).
  • Oguz A. Developing a scale for learner autonomy support//Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice. 2013. Vol. 13, no. 4. Pp. 2187-2194 DOI: 10.12738/estp.2013.4.1870
  • Reinders H., White C. 20 years of autonomy and technology: how far have we come and where to next?//Language Learning & Technology. 2016. Vol. 20, no. 2. Pp. 143-154. URL: http://llt.msu.edu/issues/june2016/reinderswhite.pdf (дата обращения: 01.05.2017).
  • Wermke W., Hostfalt G. Contextualizing teacher autonomy in time and space: A model for comparing various forms of governing the teaching profession//Journal of Curriculum Studies. 2014. Vol. 46, no. 1. Pp. 58-80 DOI: 10.1080/00220272.2013.812681
  • Ravikumar V., Abdul Ghani K. A., Aziah I. The effect of teacher autonomy on assessment practices among Malaysian cluster school teachers//International Journal of Asian Social Science. 2015. Vol. 5, no. 1. Pp. 31-36 DOI: 10.18488/journal.1/2015.5.1/1.1.31.36
  • Бухтеева Е. Е., Кальней В. А. Автономный подход в педагогике как методологическая категория//Вестник РМАТ. 2014. Вып. 3. С. 78-83. URL: http://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/avtonomnyy-podhod-v-pedagogike-kak-metodologi cheskaya-kategoriya (дата обращения: 28.04.2017).
  • Aviram A. Beyond constructivism//Studies in Philosophy and Education. 2000. Vol. 19, no. 5-6. Pp. 465-489 DOI: 10.1023/A:1005267111741
  • Марковина И. Ю., Гаврилюк О. А., Макфарланд Дж. Международная программа повышения квалификации преподавателей английского языка медицинских вузов: новая модель//Медицинское образование и вузовская наука. 2017. Т. 1, № 9. С. 61-64. URL: http://www.sechenov.ru/upload/iblock/2ad/med_obr_1_9_2017.pdf (дата обращения: 22.04.2017).
  • SvenssonL., WihlborgM. Internationalising the content of Higher Education: the need for a curriculum perspective//Higher Education. 2010. Vol. 60, no. 6. Pp. 595-613 DOI: 10.1007/s10734-010-9318-6
Еще
Статья научная