The basic principles of training future teachers to work with younger students with experience of traumatic effects

Автор: Alla Belousova, Anna Grinko, Olga Fedotova, Marachli Nusaiba, Alali Shiraz

Журнал: International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education @ijcrsee

Рубрика: Original research

Статья в выпуске: 3 vol.9, 2021 года.

Бесплатный доступ

The article shows that the unstable situation in the world leads to possible armed conflicts, affecting primarily children, experiencing various traumatic consequences. Such a situation arises in post-conflict regions and creates a need for teachers who possess the necessary competencies when teaching children with experience of traumatic effects. The purpose of the article is to study the state and trends in the development of psychological and pedagogical issues related to the use of collaborative learning technologies to form the psychological culture of future teachers in order to further work with children with experience of traumatic effects. It is shown that the analysis of the formation and development of the problems of group psychological corrective work is grounded on the basic principles identified by representatives of various directions. The authors propose to build the training of future teachers on the basis of a model of joint thinking for the subsequent organization of teachers' interaction with children who have experience of traumatic effects. The authors analyzed the basic principles of group psychologically corrective work from the point of view of the possibilities of organizing joint thinking. The basic principles of the organization of training of future teachers were highlighted, their meaningful characteristics for the purposes of organizing joint thinking were given. A comparison of the principles of group psychological corrective work and the principles of the organization of joint thinking of future teachers is carried out. Their correlation and the importance of using joint thinking in organizing the training of future teachers and for conducting psychologically corrective work with children are shown.

Еще

Principles of teaching, psychological corrective work, collaborative thinking, junior schoolchildren, traumatic impact, future teacher

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/170198642

IDR: 170198642   |   DOI: 10.23947/2334-8496-2021-9-3-375-384

Список литературы The basic principles of training future teachers to work with younger students with experience of traumatic effects

  • Abakumova, I. V., Belousova, A. K., Zorina, E. S., Maksimovich, E., Nikolaeva, E. A., Nurmukhamedova, I. V., Stošić, L., Fedotova, O. D. (2019). Психолого-педагогические основы инновационных методов обучения в высшей школе [Psychological and pedagogical foundations of innovative teaching methods in higher school]. Moscow, “Publishing House” KnoRus. Retrieved from https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=42466867
  • Abakumova, I. V., Kagermazova, L.Ts, & Ermakov, P. N. (2016). Технологии направленной трансляции смыслов в практике учебного процесса [Technologies of directed translation of meanings in the practice of the educational process]. Moscow, Credo. Retrieved from https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=25571204
  • Ahonen, A., & Harding, S. M. (2018). Assessing online collaborative problem solving among school children in finland: a case study using ATC21S TM in a National Context. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 17(2), 138-158. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.17.2.9
  • Barron, B. (2003). When smart groups fail. Journal of the Learning Science. 12(3), 307–359. https://doi.org/10.1207/ S15327809JLS1203_1
  • Belousova, A. K. (2010). Initiation of collaborative thinking activity self-organization. Saarbrücken: LAP LAMBERT.
  • Belousova, A. (2020). Functions of Participants in the Collaborative Solution of Thinking Problems. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education (IJCRSEE), 8(Special issue), 29–36. https://doi. org/10.23947/2334-8496-2020-8-SI-29-36
  • Belousova, A. K. (2002). Самоорганизация совместной мыслительной деятельности [Self-organization of Collaborative thinking activity]. Rostov-on-Don: Publishing house of the Rostov Pedagogical University. Retrieved from https://www. elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=23550556
  • Belousova, A. K, & Grinko, A. A. (2010). Личностные оценки как проявление смысловых установок в процессах мышления о другом человеке [Personal assessments as a manifestation of semantic attitudes in the processes of thinking about another person. News of the Southern Federal University. Pedagogical sciences]. Известия Южного федерального университета. Педагогические науки. 11, 129-136. Retrieved from https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=15553568
  • Belousova, A. K, & Grinko, A. A. (2016). Development of thinking about themselves by participants of group psychotherapy. International Journal of Psychology. 51. S1. 183. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12299
  • Belousova, A. K, & Nurmukhamedova, I. V. (2010). Компоненты совместного мышления в педагогической деятельности учителей [Components of Collaborative thinking in the pedagogical activity of teachers. News of the Southern Federal University. Pedagogical sciences]. Известия Южного федерального университета. Педагогические науки. 6, 77-84. Retrieved from https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=15123239
  • Belousova, A. K., & Pavlova, T. V. (2013). Features of Communicative Sphere of Preschool Children Collaborative Thinking Activity. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education (IJCRSEE), 1(1), 1–4. Retrieved from https://www.ijcrsee.com/index.php/ijcrsee/article/view/55
  • Betancourt, T. S., & Khan, K. T. (2008). The mental health of children affected by armed conflict: protective processes and pathways to resilience. International review of psychiatry (Abingdon, England), 20(3), 317–328. https://doi. org/10.1080/09540260802090363
  • Burlakova, N. S. (2019). Угрозы психологическому благополучию и развитию ребенка в условиях крупных антропогенных, природных и социогенных бедствий [Threats to the psychological well-being and development of the child in conditions of major anthropogenic, natural and sociogenic disasters. In: Tkhostov A. Sh. Rasskazova E. I. (eds) Guide to health psychology]. Руководство по психологии здоровья. (Ред.) Тхостов А. Ш. Рассказова Е. И. Moscow, Moscow University Press. 393-424. Retrieved from https://msupress.com/catalogue/books/book/ rukovodstvo-po-psikhologii-zdorovya/
  • Care, E., Scoular, C., & Griffin, P. (2016). Assessment of collaborative problem solving in education environments. Applied Measurement in Education, 29(4), 250-264. https://doi.org/10.1080/08957347.2016.1209204
  • Chen, L., Yoshimatsu, N., Goda, Y., Okubo, F., Taniguchi, Y., Oi, M. & Yamada, M. (2019). Direction of collaborative problem solving-based STEM learning by learning analytics approach. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 14(1), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-019-0119-y
  • Chi, M. T. H. (2009). Active-Constructive-Interactive: A Conceptual Framework for Differentiating Learning Activities. Topics in Cognitive Science. 1, 73–105. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2008.01005.x
  • Chi, MTH, & Menekse, M (2015). Dialogue patterns in peer collaboration that promote learning. In: Resnick, L, Asterhan, C, Clarke, S (eds) Socializing Intelligence through Academic Talk and Dialogue. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association, pp. 253–264. https://doi.org/10.3102/978-0-935302-43-1_21
  • Craig, G, & Bokum, D. (2019). Психология развития [Developmental psychology]. St. Petersburg: Peter. https://www.labirint. ru/books/524531/
  • Craig, S. D., Chi, M. T., & VanLehn, K. (2009). Improving Classroom Learning by Collaboratively Observing Human Tutoring Videos while Problem Solving. Journal of Educational Psychology. 101, 779-789. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016601
  • Dautov, D. F., Lomova N. V., Rashchupkina Y. V., Nikolenko O. F, & Tushnova J. A. (2019). Cognitive Maps of Participants in Joint Mental Activity. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Education Science and Social Development (ESSD 2019). 210-214. https://doi.org/10.2991/essd-19.2019.47
  • Dautov, D. (2021). The Ratio of Verbal and Nonverbal Components of Individual Cognitive Maps as a Reflection of the Collaborative Thinking Activity of Its Participants. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education (IJCRSEE), 9(1), 51–62. https://doi.org/10.23947/2334-8496-2021-9-1-51-62
  • Davydov, V. V. (2001). Виды обобщения в обучении [Types of generalization in learning]. Moscow: Pedagogical Society of Russia. Retrieved from https://www.koob.ru/davidov_vasili/
  • Dillenbourg, P., Baker, M., Blaye, A., & O’Malley, C. (1996). The evolution of research on collaborative learning. In: E. Spada & P. Reiman (eds.) Learning in humans and machine: Towards an interdisciplinary learning science. Oxford: Elsevir. 189-211. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9827-7_1
  • Elkonin, D. B. (1997). Психическое развитие в детских возрастах: избранные психологические труды [Mental development in childhood: selected psychological works]. Moscow, Institute of Practical Psychology; Voronezh, NPO MODEK. Retrieved from https://www.koob.ru/elkonin_d_b/men_development
  • Ermak V. V. (2013). Особенности изменений смыслового содержания субъективной картины болезни у участников групповой психологической коррекции [Features of changes in the semantic content of the subjective picture of the disease among participants in group psychological correction. University Bulletin (State University of Management)]. Вестник Университета (Государственный университет управления). (18), 236-240. Retrieved from https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/osobennosti-izmeneniy-smyslovogo-soderzhaniya-subektivnoy-kartiny-bolezni-u-uchastnikov-gruppovoy-psihologicheskoy-korrektsii
  • Fedotova, O. (2015). Modern Education in the Framwork of Affirmatine and Non-Affirmative Approaches. In: Procedia - Social and Behavior Sciences. 2015. 180, 55-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.085
  • Fedotova, O, & Chigisheva, O. (2015). Comparative Analysis: Methodological Optics in the Ideological Context. International perspectives on Education and Society Series. Comparative Sciences: interdisciplinary approaches. (26), 57-82. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-367920140000026003
  • Fedotova, O, & Latun, V. (2015). Experimental Study of Audiovisual Approach in a Course on the Psychology of Creativity. In: Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 191, 1054-1061. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.437
  • Griffin, P. (2017). Assessing and Teaching 21st Century Skills: Collaborative Problem Solving as a Case Study. In: von Davier A., Zhu M., Kyllonen P. (eds) Innovative Assessment of Collaboration. Methodology of Educational Measurement and Assessment. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33261-1_8
  • Harding, S. M. E., Griffin, P. E., Awwal, N., Alom, B. M., & Scoular, C. (2017). Measuring collaborative problem solving using mathematics-based tasks. AERA Open, 3(3), 1–19. 2332858417728046. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858417728046
  • Heyman, G. D. (2008). Children’s Critical Thinking When Learning from Others. Current directions in psychological science, 17(5), 344–347. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2008.00603.x
  • Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2013). The impact of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning environments on achievement. In J. Hattie & E. Anderman (eds.) International handbook of student achievement (372-374). New York: Routledge. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/260596923_Johnson_D_W_ Johnson_R_T_2013_The_impact_of_cooperative_competitive_and_individualistic_learning_environments_on_ achievement_In_J_Hattie_E_Anderman_Eds_International_handbook_of_student_achievement_372
  • Klochko, V. E., & Galazhinskiy, E. V. (1999). Самореализация личности: системный взгляд [Person self-realization: system view]. Tomsk: Tomsk University Publishing House. Retrieved from http://vital.lib.tsu.ru/vital/access/manager/ Repository/vtls:000112507
  • Leitz, G. (2017). Психодрама: теория и практика. Классическая психодрама Я.Л. Морено [Psychodrama: theory and practice. Classic psychodrama by Ya.L. Moreno]. Moscow, “Kogito-Center”. Retrieved from https://www.klex.ru/18e
  • Leontiev, A. N. (2004). Деятельность. Сознание. Личность [Activity. Consciousness. Personality]. Moscow: Sense, Academy. Retrieved from https://www.koob.ru/leontjev_a_n/dejatelnost_soznanie_lichnost
  • Lewin, K. (2019). Теория поля в социальных науках [Field theory in the social sciences]. Moscow, Академический проект. Retrieved from https://www.koob.ru/lewin_kurt/field_theory
  • Lioe, L. T., Fai, H. K., & Hedberg, J. G. (2006). Students’ Metacognitive Problem-Solving Strategies in Solving Openended Problems in Pairs. In: Redesigning Pedagogy. 243-259. Brill Sense. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789087900977_018
  • Masten, A. S., & Obradovic, J. (2008). Disaster preparation and recovery: Lessons from research on resilience in human development. Ecology and Society, 13(1), [9]. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-02282-130109
  • Masten, A. S., & Osofsky, J. D. (2010). Disasters and their impact on child development: Introduction to the special section. Child Development, 81(4), 1029–1039. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01452.x
  • Moreno, J. L. (2001). Психодрама [Psychodrama]. Moscow: April Press, EKSMO-Press. Retrieved from https://www.ozon.ru/ product/psihodrama-18090265/?sh=epZqNUlz
  • Norris, F. H., Stevens, S. P., Pfefferbaum, B. Wyche, K. F., & Pfefferbaum, R. L. (2008). Community Resilience as a Metaphor, Theory, Set of Capacities, and Strategy for Disaster Readiness. American journal of community psychology. 41, 127– 150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-007-9156-6
  • Nurmukhamedova, I. V. (2011). Сравнительный анализ особенностей совместной мыслительной деятельности педагогов на разных этапах школьного обучения [Comparative analysis of the features of the collaborative thinking activity of teachers at different stages of school education. Humanization of education] Гуманизация образования. (6), 26-31. Retrieved from https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/sravnitelnyy-analiz-osobennostey-sovmestnoy-myslitelnoy-deyatelnosti-pedagogov-na-raznyh-etapah-shkolnogo-obucheniya
  • Osofsky, J. D., Osofsky, H. J., & Harris, W. W. (2007). Katrina’s children: Social policy considerations for children in disasters. Social Policy Report, 21,3–18. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2379-3988.2007.tb00050.x
  • Piaget, J. (2001). The Psychology of Intelligence. London: Routledge. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203164730
  • Rudestam, K. E. (2006). Групповая психотерапия [Group psychotherapy]. St. Petersburg: Peter. Retrieved from https:// textarchive.ru/c-2065442-pall.html
  • Suroedova, E. A. (2019). Структура эмоциональной модальности педагогов с разной стратегией смыслопередачи [Structure of emotional modality of teachers with different strategy of sense transfer. Psychology of learning]. Психология обучения. (6), 103-110. Retrieved from https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=41435706
  • Terr, L. C. (1991). Childhood traumas: An outline and overview. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 148(1), 10–20. https://doi. org/10.1176/ajp.148.1.10
  • Titscher, S., Meyer, M., Wodak, R., & Vetter, E. (2009). Методы анализа текста и дискурса [Methods of Text and Discourse Analysis]. Humanitarian Centre, Kharkiv, Ukraine. Retrieved from https://studylib.ru/doc/2190201/metody-analiza-teksta-i-diskursa
  • Verbitsky, A. A. (2017). История и технологии контекстного образования [History and technologies of contextual education]. Moscow: Moscow State Pedagogical University. Retrieved from https://www.iprbookshop.ru/72517.html
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (2005). Психология развития человека [Human developmental psychology]. Moscow: Smysl; Eksmo. Retrieved from http://lchc.ucsd.edu/mca/Mail/xmcamail.2008_07.dir/att-0052/problema_razvitiya_i_raspada_vysshih_ psih_funkciy.pdf
  • Yalom, I. (2001). Групповая психотерапия: теория и практика [Group psychotherapy: theory and practice]. Moscow: April Press. Retrieved from https://www.klex.ru/5jg
  • Yuan, J., Xiao, Y., & Liu, H. (2019). Assessment of Collaborative Problem Solving Based on Process Stream Data: A New Paradigm for Extracting Indicators and Modeling Dyad Data. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 369. https://doi.org/10.3389/ fpsyg.2019.00369
  • Yul, U., & Williams, R.M. (1992). An intervention strategy for mental trauma resulting from large-scale disasters. n: Lane, D.A., Miller, A. (eds) Child and adolescent psychotherapy. Buckingham Philadelphia, Open University Press. 275-308. https://archive.org/details/childadolescentt0000unse_a9e4
Еще
Статья научная