The concept of civilization in modern studies of the Neolithic in China and Japan

The concept of civilization in modern studies of the Neolithic in China and Japan

Автор: Kudinova M.A., Ivanova D.A., Tabarev A.V.

Журнал: Archaeology, Ethnology & Anthropology of Eurasia @journal-aeae-en

Статья в выпуске: 2 т.51, 2023 года.

Бесплатный доступ

This paper presents a brief overview of studies exploring the origin of civilizations in modern archaeology of China and Japan and mostly concerning the Neolithic period. The analysis of publications shows that in Chinese and Japanese archaeology, original scholarly traditions have been developed, with their own methodological foundations and terminology. We outline the key ideas relating to the origin of civilization, elaborated by researches in China (Su Bingqi, Yan Wenming, Li Boqian, Xu Hong, Gao Jiangtao) and Japan (Harunari Hideji, Watanabe Hiroshi, Sasaki Fujio, Yasuda Yoshinori). We show that most Chinese scholars consider the formation of state a sine qua non of transition to the civilization stage. However, the problem of identifying criteria of civilization and state formation using archaeological data has not been resolved to date. Examples of archaeological markers of civilization proposed by Chinese specialists are listed. In the works by Japanese researchers, no connection between the emergence of the state and civilization has been revealed. Most Chinese archaeologists date the emergence of civilization and of the fi rst state formations to the Late Neolithic (Dawenkou, Hongshan, Liangzhu, Longshan, etc.), ca 3500–2000 BC. There are alternative hypotheses—the Early Bronze Age (Erlitou culture) and the Late Bronze Age (the Spring and Autumn period). In Japanese archaeology, there are two main positions regarding the time when civilization had formed—the Jōmon period (Neolithic) and the subsequent Yayoi period (Bronze Age). Scholarly and external (including political) factors that have infl uenced modern concepts of the origin of civilization require special historiographic research.

Еще

China, japan, civilization, neolithic, archaeological criteria of civilization

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/145146883

IDR: 145146883   |   DOI: 10.17746/1563-0110.2023.51.2.038-048

Список литературы The concept of civilization in modern studies of the Neolithic in China and Japan

  • An Illustrated Companion to Japanese Archaeology. 2020 W. Steinhaus, S. Kaner, M. Jinno, and S. Shoda (eds.). Oxford: Archaeopress.
  • Bao Yifan. 2020 Lunzheng moshi, fazhan jieduan yu butong yiyide “zuizao Zhongguo” [Rationale for models, periodization of development, and various interpretations of the meaning of “early China”]. Zhongyuan wenhua yanjiu, No. 6: 121-127. (In Chinese).
  • Chang Huaiying. 2016 Jin ershi nian lai Zhongguo xuejie guojia qiyuan yanjiu shuping [A review of research on the origins of state in the Chinese academic community over the past twenty years]. Sichuan wenwu, No. 1: 46-60. (In Chinese).
  • Child V.G. 1950 The urban revolution. The Town Planning Review, vol. 21 (1): 3-17.
  • Engels F. 2019 Proiskhozhdeniye semyi, chastnoy sobstvennosti i gosudarstva. Moscow: AST. Evolution and Culture. 1960 M.D. Sahlins, E.R. Service (eds.). Ann Arbor: Univ. of Michigan Press.
  • Fujio Shin’ichiro. 2002 Jōmon ronsō [Jōmon Controversy]. Tokyo: Kōdansha. (In Japanese).
  • Gao Jiangtao. 2005 Xia Nai xiansheng yu Zhongguo wenming qiyuan yanjiu [Teacher Xia Nai and the study of the emergence of Chinese civilization]. Pingdingshan xueyuan xuebao, No. 1: 46-48. (In Chinese).
  • Gao Jiangtao. 2019 Shilun Zhongguo zaoqi guojia xingchengde moshi yu dongle [On the models and drivers of early state formation in China]. Shixue yuekan, No. 6: 21-33. (In Chinese).
  • Habu J. 2004 Ancient Jomon of Japan, R.P. Wright (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
  • Habu J., Okamura K. 2017 Japanese archaeology today: New developments, structural undermining, and prospects for disaster archaeology. In Handbook of East and Southeast Asian Archaeology. New York: Springer, pp. 11-26.
  • Harunari Hideji. 1973 Basshi no igi (sono 1) [The signifi cance of tooth extraction practices]. Kōkogaku kenkyū, vol. 20, iss. 2 (1): 25-48. (In Japanese).
  • Hayashi Kensaku. 1977 Jōmon-ki no sōsei 2-Itai no hairetsu, tokuni atama-i hōkō [Jōmon period funeral system: Arrangement of bodies, and features of the head direction]. Kōkogaku zasshi, vol. 63, iss. 3 (2): 211-246. (In Japanese).
  • Ikawa-Smith F. 1982 Co-traditions in Japanese archaeology. World Archaeology, vol. 13: 296-309.
  • Istoriya kitaiskoy tsivilizatsii. 2020 In 4 vols. Yan Wenming (ed.), I.F. Popova and M.Y. Ulyanov (trans. from Chinese). Vol. 1: S drevneyshikh vremen do 221 g. do n.e. Moscow: Shans.
  • Kawajiri Fumihiko. 2010 Kindai Chugoku ni okeru “Bunmei”: Meiji nihon no gakujutsu to Ryo Keicho [“Civilization” in modern China: academics in Meiji Japan and Liang Qichao]. In Higashiajia kindai ni okeru gainen to chi no sai hensei, vol. 35: 131-160. (In Japanese).
  • Kradin N.N. 2006 Archaeological criteria of civilization. Social Evolution & History, vol. 5 (1): 88-107.
  • Li Boqian. 2016 Cong Zhongguo wenminghua licheng yanjiu kan guojia qiyuande ruogan lilun wenti [Some theoretical issues of the origin of the state in the context of the study of the formation of Chinese civilization]. Zhongyuan wenhua yanjiu, No. 1: 5-9. (In Chinese).
  • Lin Yun. 2016 Zhongguo kaoguxue zhong “guguo”, “fangguo”, “wangguo” de lilun yu fangfa wenti [Theoretical and methodological problems of applying the terms “ancient state”, “chiefdom”, and “kingdom” in Chinese archaeology]. Zhongyuan wenhua yanjiu, No. 2: 5-12. (In Chinese).
  • Masson V.M. 1989 Perviye tsivilizatsii, I.N. Khlopin (ed.). Leningrad: Nauka.
  • Melichar H. 1964 Japanese archaeological terms with English and German equivalents. Asian Perspectives, vol. 8 (2): 1-111.
  • Morimoto Rokuji. 1935 Yayoi-shiki bunka [Yayoi culture]. Dorumen zasshi, vol. 4 (6): 88-91. (In Japanese).
  • Morohashi Tetsuji. 1967 Dai Kan-Wa jiten [Great Chinese-Japanese Dictionary], in 13 vols. Vol. 5. Tokyo: Taishūkan Shoten. (In Japanese).
  • Nakamura Oki. 1999 Haka-sei kara yomu jōmon shakai no kaisō-ka [Hierarchization of Jōmon society as seen from the tomb system]. In Saishin jōmon-gaku no sekai. Tokyo: Asahi shinbunsha, pp. 48-60. (In Japanese).
  • Okamura Wataru. 2014 Yayoi shūraku-zō no genten o minaosu Toro iseki. [Revisiting the original viewpoint of Yayoi village - Toro site]. Tokyo: Shinsensha. (In Japanese). (Iseki o manabu; No. 99).
  • Popova I.F. 2020 Predisloviye k russkomu izdaniyu. In Istoriya kitaiskoy tsivilizatsii, in 4 vols. Yan Wenming (ed.), I.F. Popova, M.Y. Ulyanova (trans. from Chinese). Vol. 1: S drevneyshikh vremen do 221 g. do n.e. Moscow: Shans, pp. 5-8.
  • Ruigo dai jiten. 2002 [The Dictionary of Synonyms]. Takeshi Shibata, Susumu Yamada (eds.). Tokyo: Kōdansha. (In Japanese). Sasaki Fujio. 1973 Genshi kyōdōtai-ron josetsu [Introduction to Primitive Communities]. Tokyo: Koganei. (In Japanese).
  • Sasaki Fujio. 1999 Kita no bunmei - Minami no bunmei (shita): Kyokō no naka no jōmon jidai shūraku-ron [Northern civilization and southern civilization (under) - Jōmon period settlement theory in fi ction]. Ibou, iss. 17: 79-90. (In Japanese).
  • Sasaki Fujio. 2002 Kanjō resseki to jōmon-shiki kaisō shakai - Сhūki to kōki no Chūbu, Kantō, Tōhoku [Stone circles and Jōmon hierarchical society: Middle and late period in Chubu, Kanto and Tohoku]. In Jōmon shakai-ron. Tokyo: Dōseisha, pp. 3-50. (In Japanese).
  • Seki Yūji. 2020 Jōmon bunmei to Chūgoku bunmei [Jōmon and Chinese Cultures]. Tokyo: PHP Publishing. (In Japanese).
  • Service E.R. 1975 Origins of the State and Civilization: The Process of Cultural Evolution. New York: W.W. Norton & Company Inc. Shin Nihon kōkogaku shyōjiten. 2005 [New Japanese Archaeology Dictionary]. Esaka T., Serizawa C., and Sakazume H. (eds.). Tokyo: Nyūsaiensu-sha. (In Japanese).
  • Su Bingqi. 1988 Zhongguo wenmingde xin shuguang [The new dawn of Chinese civilization]. Dongnan wenhua, No. 5: 1-7. (In Chinese).
  • Su Bingqi. 1997 Zhongguo wenming qiyuan xintan [A New Study of the Origin of Chinese Civilization]. Hong Kong: Shangwu yinshuguan. (In Chinese).
  • Sun Qingwei. 2021 Xunzhao zhonghua wenmingde jiazhi - Chongdu Zhang Guangzhi “Kaoguxue zhuanti liu jiang” [The search for the meaning of Chinese civilization: Rereading Zhang Guangzhi’s “Six Lectures on Archaeology”]. Beijing daxue xuebao, vol. 58 (2): 65-75. (In Chinese).
  • The Early State. 1978 H.J.M. Claessen, P. Skalnik (eds.). The Hague: Mouton Publishers.
  • Tsuboi Kiyotari. 1962 Jōmon bunka-ron [Jōmon culture theory]. In Iwanami kōza Nihon rekishi. Vol. 1: Genshi oyobi kodai. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten, pp. 109-138. (In Japanese).
  • Umehara Takeshi, Yasuda Yoshinori. 1995 Jōmon bunmei no hakken - Kyōi no San’nai Maruyama iseki [Discovery of Jōmon Civilization - Amazing Sannai Maruyama Site]. Tokyo: PHP Publ. (In Japanese).
  • Wa-Ei taishō : Nihon kō kogaku yō go jiten. 2001 [Dictionary of Japanese Archaeological Terms], T. Yamamoto (ed.). Tokyo: Tō kyō Bijutsu. (In Japanese).
  • Wang Zhenzhong. 2020 Gaige kaifang sishi yu nian Zhongguo wenming he guojia qiyuan yanjiu [Studies on the origins of civilization and the state in China over forty years of reform and openness]. Shixue yuekan, No. 9: 113-126. (In Chinese).
  • Xia Nai. 1985 Zhongguo wenmingde qiyuan [The Origins of Chinese Civilization]. Beijing: Wenwu chubanshe. (In Chinese).
  • Xu Hong. 2016 Zhongguo kaoguxue jie guojia qiyuan tansuode xinlu licheng yu xiangguan sikao [The development of the state origins study in the archaeological community of China and refl ections on it]. Zhongyuan wenhua yanjiu, No. 2: 13-17. (In Chinese).
  • Yamada Yasuhiro. 2015 Tsukura reta Jōmon jidai nipponbunka no gen zō o saguru [Searching for the Original Image of Japanese Culture in the Jōmon Period]. Tokyo: Shinchō sensho. (In Japanese).
  • Yamada Yasuhiro. 2020 Kōkogaku-shi to shakai haikei [History of Archaeology and Social Background]. Kikan kōkogaku, iss. 150: 28-33. (In Japanese).
  • Yamanouchi Sugao. 1932 Nihon enko no bunka [Ancient cultures of Japan: Review of the pottery traditions of the Jōmon]. Dorumen zasshi, vol. 1 (4): 40-43. (In Japanese).
  • Yan Wenming. 1997 Huanghe liuyu wenmingde faxiang yu fazhan [Emergence and development of civilization in the Huanghe basin]. Huaxia kaogu, No. 1: 49-54. (In Chinese).
  • Yasuda Yoshinori. 1997 Jōmon bunmei no kankyō [Environment of Jōmon civilization]. Tokyo: Yoshikawa Kōbunkan. (In Japanese).
  • Ye Wenxian. 2016. “Guojia” yu “wenming” bianxi [An analysis of the differences between “state” and “civilization”]. Zhejiang shehui kexue, No. 1: 92-105. (In Chinese).
  • Yi Jianping. 2014 Guanyu guojia dingyide chongxin renshi [On rethinking the scientifi c defi nition of the state]. Lishi yanjiu, No. 2: 143-161. (In Chinese).
  • Zhang Guangzhi. 1986 Kaoguxue zhuanti liu jiang [Six Lectures on Archaeology]. Beijing: Wenwu chubanshe. (In Chinese).
Еще
Статья научная
QR-код для установки приложения SciUp Наведите камеру и скачайте бесплатное приложение SciUp