The impact of interlanguage on students’ bilingual behaviour during the process of acquiring a foreign language

Автор: Kostina Ekaterina Alekseevna, Hackett-Jones Aleksandra Valerievna, Bagramova Nina Vitalievna

Журнал: Science for Education Today @sciforedu

Рубрика: Педагогика и психология

Статья в выпуске: 4 (38), 2017 года.

Бесплатный доступ

Introduction. The article presents an overview of the major ideas of contemporary foreign and Russian researchers on the issue of the speech mechanism formation of a foreign language learner. The authors aim to identify effective synergetic ways of employing linguistics, psycholinguistics and the methodology of foreign language teaching that can improve the efficiency of the language learning process. The authors note that, despite a number of research papers on the subject, published both in Russia and abroad, the science still lacks a clear-cut definition of this phenomenon, and its role in the process of foreign language acquisition is not stated. Thus the research problem of the paper is to study the intermediate language system in the speech mechanism of a bilingual acquiring a foreign language at a given stage. The purpose of the study is to determine the nature and the status of an intermediate language system and its role in foreign language acquisition, and to find out the ways of optimizing the process of foreign language teaching based on the data obtained. In line with the purpose set, the following research objectives were identified: 1) based on the analysis of research literature on the issues in question, to clarify the naming of the intermediate language system and define its nature; 2) to examine the component structure of the interlanguage; 3) based on the integration of data from linguistics, psycholinguistics, and psychology, to determine techniques that influence the dynamics of interlanguage development that can contribute to improving the effectiveness of the teaching process. Materials and Methods. The methods employed in the current research combined the analysis of research literature in the fields of linguistics, psycholinguistics, methodology of foreign language teaching, psychology on the issues under study, the contrastive and comparative analysis of languages involved in the speech mechanism of a bilingual, the method of integrating psychological, psycholinguistic, and linguistic data. Results. Some authors show skepticism with regard to the existence of the third language system in a bilingual setting. The article presents argumentation to prove the systemic character of this phenomenon, which results in defining the third language system as an intermediate system that psychologically combines three linguistic systems (native language, the third language system, the target language), and represents a continuum of certain changes. This continuum is dynamic in its nature, and consists of a series of approximate systems, each of which consistently and increasingly approaches the target language. All learners of foreign languages show certain deviations from the norm, that is, language mistakes, the existence and nature of which enable the teacher to evaluate the student’s progress in learning the language. Conclusion. The article explores such a relevant phenomenon for the methodology of foreign language teaching as fossilization, which manifests itself in the interlanguage behavior of a bilingual as a result of the summation of five central processes that constitute the latent psychological structure of the individual. Fossilization is interpreted as a phenomenon known as typical persistent errors as opposed to occasional mistakes. The authors analyze the main characteristics of fossilization, such as its dynamism and stability that make the research subject of the theory of speech errors. Based on the analysis and integration of linguistic, psycholinguistic and psychological data, the authors develop methodological recommendations for optimizing the foreign language teaching process. It is concluded that the interlanguage is a complex dynamic system that continually accompanies the process of developing bilingualism and is based on the laws of linguistics, psychology and psycholinguistics. Studying the nature of this system can greatly enhance the efficiency of the process of foreign language acquisition.

Еще

Interlanguage, intermediate language system, latent psychological structure, interference, overgeneralization, fossilization, languages comparative analysis, linguistic errors, learners psychological features, cognitive styles

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/147137837

IDR: 147137837   |   DOI: 10.15293/2226-3365.1704.06

Список литературы The impact of interlanguage on students’ bilingual behaviour during the process of acquiring a foreign language

  • Adamson H. D. Interlanguage Variation in Theoretical and Pedagogical Perspective. -London: Routledge, 2009. -214 p DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203887363
  • Adjemian C. On the Nature of Interlanguage Systems//Language Learning. -1976. -Vol. 26, Issue 2. -P. 297-320 DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1976.tb00279.x
  • Ansaldo A. I., Ghazi-Saidi L., Adrover-Roig D. Interference control in elderly bilinguals: Appearances can be misleading//Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology. -2015. -Vol. 37, Issue 5. -P. 455-470 DOI: 10.1080/13803395.2014.990359
  • Berrior P., Ghazi-Saidi L., Dash T., Adrover-Roig D., Benali H., Ansaldo A. I. Interference control at the response level: Functional networks reveal higher efficiency in the bilingual brain//Journal of Neurolinguistics. -2016. -Vol. 43, Part A. -P. 4-16 DOI: 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2016.09.007
  • Sankoff G. BickertonDerek Dynamics of a creole system. London: Cambridge University Press, 1975. Pp. viii + 224//Journal of Linguistics. -1977. -Vol. 13, Issue 2. -P. 292-306. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700005454
  • Corder S. P. Idiosyncratic dialects and error analysis//International Review of Applied Linguistics and Language Teaching. -1971. -Vol. 9, Issue 2. -P. 147-160. https://dx.doi.o DOI: rg/10.1515/iral.1971.9.2.147
  • Dmitrenko V. Language learning strategies of multilingual adults learning additional languages//International Journal of Multilingualism. -2017. -Vol. 14, Issue 1. -P. 6-22 DOI: 10.1080/14790718.2017.1258978
  • Esfahani F. R. Wh-constraints in Interlanguage Grammar of Persian EFL Learners and its Implication for Teaching English as a Foreign Language//Procedia -Social and Behavioral Sciences. -2015. -Vol. 192. -P. 737-747. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.089
  • Fairclough N. Language and globalisation. -Oxford: Routledge, 2006. -186 p. 1.10. Gold B. T., Kim C., Johnson N. F., Kryscio R. J., Smith C. D. Lifelong bilingualism maintains neural efficiency for cognitive control in aging//Journal of Neuroscience. -2013. -Vol. 33 (2). -P. 387-396. https://dx.doi.o DOI: rg/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3837-12.2013
  • Gold B. T., Kim C., Johnson N. F., Kryscio R. J., Smith C. D. Lifelong bilingualism maintains neural efficiency for cognitive control in aging//Journal of Neuroscience. -2013. -Vol. 33 (2). -P. 387-396. https://dx.doi.o DOI: rg/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3837-12.2013
  • Jakobovits L. A. Research Findings and Foreign Language Requirements in Colleges and Universities//Foreign Language Annals. -1969. -Vol. 2, Issue 4. -P. 436-456. https://dx.doi.o DOI: rg/10.1111/j.1944-9720.1969.tb00321.x
  • Jäschke K., Plag I. The Dative Alternation in German-English Interlanguage//Studies in Second Language Acquisition. -2016. -Vol. 38, Issue 3. -P. 485-521. https://dx.doi.o DOI: rg/10.1017/S0272263115000261
  • Jordens P. Rules, grammatical intuitions and strategies in foreign language learning//Interlanguage Studies Bulletin. -1977. -Vol. 2, № 2. -P. 5-76. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43135167
  • Hosseini S. S., Sangani H. R. Studying the Pre-Intermediate Iranian EL Learners’ Interlanguage and the Contribution of their Innate System to the Development of their Oral Communicative Proficiency//Procedia -Social and Behavioral Sciences. -2015. -Vol. 192. -P. 408-418. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.057
  • Kykalova M., Vasilyeva E. A. On the problem of categorizing students based on their cognitive styles and teaching strategies//Procedia -Social and Behavioral Sciences. -2015. -Vol. 176. -P. 578-587. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.513
  • Maseleno A., Hardaker G., Sabani N., Suhaili N. Data on multicultural education and diagnostic information profiling: Culture, learning styles and creativity//Data in Brief. -2016. -Vol. 9. -P. 1048-1051 DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2016.11.024
  • Matusevych Y., Alishahi A., Backus A. The impact of first and second language exposure on learning second language constructions//Bilingualism: Language and Cognition. -2017. -Vol. 20, Issue 1. -P. 128-149. https://dx.doi.o DOI: rg/10.1017/S1366728915000607
  • Munoz Luna R. Interlanguage in undergraduates' academic English: Preliminary results from written script analysis//Encuentro. -2010. -Vol. 19. -P. 60-73. http://www.encuentrojournal.org/textos/Mu_oz_Luna.pdf
  • Nazarenko L. Methods of overcoming the language interference in the speech of Russian-speaking immigrants in the Czech Republic//Procedia -Social and Behavioral Sciences. -2013. -Vol. 93. -P. 1630-1633. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.092
  • Nemser W. Approximative Systems of Foreign Language Learners//International Review of Applied Linguistics. -1974. -Vol. 9, Issue 2. -P. 115-123 DOI: 10.1515/iral.1971.9.2.115
  • Podlipský V. J., Šimáčková S., Petráž D. Is there an interlanguage speech credibility benefit?//Topics in Linguistics. -2016. -Vol. 17, Issue 1. -P. 30-44. https://dx.doi.o DOI: rg/10.1515/topling-2016-0003
  • Richards J. C., Kennedy G. Interlanguage: A Review and a Preview//Regional English Language Centre Journal. -1977. -Vol. 8, Issue 1. -P. 13-28. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/003368827700800102
  • Рогозная Н. Н. Билингвизм. Интерязык. Интерференция: монография. -Иркутск: Изд-во ИрГТУ, 2012. -169 c.
  • Schumann J. H. The Pidginization Process: A Model for Second Language Acquisition. -Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House Publ., 1978. -190 p. https://catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/000311214
  • Selinker L. Interlanguage//International Review of Applied Linguistics. -1972. -Vol. 10, Issue 1-4. -P. 209-232. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.1972.10.1-4.209
  • Шевнин А. Б. Эрратология и межъязыковая коммуникация//Вестник ВГУ. Серия «Лингвистика и межкультурная коммуникация». -2004. -№ 2. -C. 36-44.
  • Tarone E. Interlanguage as chameleon//Language Learning: A Journal of Research in Language Studies. -1979. -Vol. 29, Issue 1. -P. 181-191. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1979.tb01058.x
  • Верещагин Е. М. Понятие «интерференции» в лингвистической и психологической литературе//Иностранные языки в высшей школе. -1968. -№ 4. -С. 103-110.
  • Wardhaugh R. The contrastive analysis hypothesis//TESOL Quarterly. -1970. -Vol. 4, № 2. -P. 123-130 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3586182
  • Whitman R. Contrastive analysis: problems and procedures//Language Learning. -1970. -Vol. 20, Issue 2. -P. 191-197. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1970.tb00476.x
  • Rosenzweig V. Y. Language contacts: Linguistic issues. Leningrad, Nauka, Leningrad Branch Publ., 1972, 80 p.
  • Weinreich U. Languages in Contact: findings and problems (Publications of the Linguistic Circle of New York, #1). New York, 1953, 148 p.
  • Rogoznaya N. N. "Me you no understand", or Interlanguage. Russian Language Abroad, 2003, no. 1, pp. 53-56.
  • Loseva N. V. Several Aspects of Using the Interlanguage Theory in the Methodology of Foreign Language Teaching. Human and their Language: Papers of the XVI International Conference of the Academic School and Seminar named after L.M. Skrelina, Herzen University. St Petersburg, Skifia Publ., 2013, pp. 296-301.
  • Zalevskaya A.A., Medvedeva I.L. Psycholinguistic Problems of Academic Bilinguism: a study guide. Never, Never State University Publ., 2002, 194 p.
  • Karlinsky A. E. The Fundamentals of the Theory of Language Interaction. Alma-Aty, "Gylym" Publ., 1990, 181 p.
  • Karlinsky A. E. The Fundamentals of the Theory of Language Interaction. Alma-Aty, "Gylym" Publ., 1990, 181 p.
  • Brown H. D. Principles of Language Learning and Teaching, 2nd ed. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1987, 285 p.
  • Rosenzweig V. Y. Language contacts: Linguistic issues. Leningrad, Nauka, Leningrad Branch Publ., 1972, 80 p.
  • Azimov E. G., Shchukin A. N. A New Dictionary of Methodological Terms and Notions (theory and practice of language teaching). Moscow, IKAR Publ., 2009, 448 p.
Еще
Статья научная