The methodological problems of correlation (or compliance) and quality metric assessments in neuropsychology

Автор: Astaeva Alena V., Berebin Michael A., Novokhatski Anastasia V.

Журнал: Психология. Психофизиология @jpps-susu

Рубрика: Клиническая (медицинская) психология

Статья в выпуске: 2 т.6, 2013 года.

Бесплатный доступ

This article highlights the strengths and weaknesses of to two research directions neuropsychology of domestic and foreign, as well as identifying possible areas of integration. One of the most acute problems is the development of experimental psychological methods to determine the quantitative and expressed characteristics of the psychic phenomena by flexibly combining qualitative and quantitative approaches, with a view to putting into practice foreign neuroscience principles and standards of evidence. An analysis of contemporary publications on neuropsychological diagnosis reveals the need to consider the standardization of neuropsychological research in the context of current approaches, requirements, and psychodiagnostic criteria. In the domestic neuropsychological literature, these issues are need attention: standardized procedures for presenting stimuli are not, as a rule, described; basic psychometric assessment of the results of the tests is lacking; no investigation of their clinical and psychometric validity is carried out. An analysis was made of the nature of the psychometric approach in foreign child neuropsychology, which relies on mathematical procedures of processing qualitative (ordinal) data converted into quantitative indicators. We examined separately the mathematical software for clinical trials (based on the principles of «evidence-based medicine« which relies on the «abnormal» nature of the distribution of clinical phenomena.

Еще

Neuropsychological diagnostics, psychometric approach, norm, qualitative and quantitative assessment of results

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/147159858

IDR: 147159858

Список литературы The methodological problems of correlation (or compliance) and quality metric assessments in neuropsychology

  • Apperly I. A., Samson D., Humphreys G. W. (2005). Domain-specificity and theory of mind: Evaluating neuropsychological evidence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(12), 2005, pp. 572-577.
  • Astaeva A.V., Berebin, M.A. (2012) Comparative analysis of Russian and foreign systems for the neuropsychological diagnosis of children from the standpoint of the psychometrical approach and its limitations when used in clinical practice. Psychology in Russia: State of the Art. Moscow, 4, 2012, pp. 203 -218.
  • Berebin М. А., Astaeva A.V. On the qualitative and psychometric approaches in contemporary neuropsychological assessment. Vestnik SUSU [Bulletin of South Ural State University]. Chelyabinsk, 32, 2008, pp. 19-28.
  • Bizuk A.P. Osnovy neyropsihologiy. St.-Petersburg, Piter, 2005, 400 p.
  • Bodalev A.A., Stolin V.V. Obshaya psihodiagnostika. St.-Petersburg, Piter, 2000, 440 p.
  • Burlachuk L.F. Slovar-cpravochnik po pcihodiagnoctiki. St.-Petersburg, Piter, 2002, 163 p.
  • Fletcher, R. Clinical epidemiology. Moscow, MedyoSfera. 1998, p. 386.
  • Furr, R. M. (2008). Psychometrics. Thousand Oaks, CA, Saga, 2008, 368 p.
  • Guyatt G., Rennie D. Users' Guides to the Medical Literature: Manual for Evidence-Based Clinical Practice (2nd ed). Chicago, IL, American Medical Association, 2002, 367 p.
  • Glozman J.M. The Quantitative evaluation of neuropsychological assessment data. Moscow, Center Lechebnoy Pedagogyky, 1999, 160 p.
  • Glozman J.M. Neuropsychological assessment of children in preschool years. St.-Petersburg, Piter, 2006, 80 p.
  • Groth-Marnat G. Handbook of psychological assessment (4th ed.). New York, Wiley, 2003, 844 p.
  • Haladyna T.M., Downing, S.M. Handbook of test development. New York, Taylor & Francis, 2006, pp 725-738.
  • Mikadze Y.B. Neyropsyhologiya detskogo vozrasta. St.-Petersburg, Piter, 2008, 288 p.
  • McKibbon A., Wilczynski N. PDQ Evidence-Based Principles and Practice. Shelton, Connecticut: People’s Medical Publishing House, 2009.
  • Rabin L.A. Assessment practices of clinical neuropsychologists in the United States and Canada. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 2005, Jan. 20 (1), 33-65.
  • Sidorenko E.V. Method of mathematical processing in psychology. St.-Petersburg, Rech, 2002, 350 p.
  • Strauss E.A. Compendium of neuropsychological tests: Administration, norms, and commentary (3rd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press, 2009, 1225 p.
  • Suppes P. A foundation of the measurement theory. Moscow, Mir, 1967, 287 p.
  • Vanderslice-Barr J.L., Lynch J.K., McCaffrey R. J. Screening for neuropsychological impairment in children using Reitan and Wolfson's preliminary neuropsychological test battery. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 2008, 23(3), 243-249.
  • Wasserman L.I. Methods of neuropsychological diagnosis. St. Petersburg, Stroylespechat, 1997, 380 p.
  • Wasserman L.I., Shchelkova O.J. Medical psychodiagnostic. St. Petersburg, Akademiya, 2004, 736 p.
Еще
Статья научная