The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Judicial Systems

The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Judicial Systems

Автор: Žaklina Spalević, Srđan Milosavljević, Dobrivoje Dubljanin, Gradimirka Popović, Miloš Ilić

Журнал: International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education @ijcrsee

Рубрика: Original research

Статья в выпуске: 3 vol.12, 2024 года.

Бесплатный доступ

The problem we tried to solve relates to the application of artificial intelligence in the legal and judicial system. Given the fact that artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly taking precedence in various areas of human existence and work, it is an undoubted fact that the legal and judicial systems have not been left out either. It is precisely for this reason that the current state of the use of artificial intelligence in the judicial system, as well as potential new solutions, was first reviewed. In addition to the current one, we focused on the application of artificial intelligence in the legal and judicial system, especially in the domain of decision-making. In this regard, in this paper we propose the use of explainable artificial intelligence, which increasingly takes place when dealing with systems in which the precision and clarity of the parameters on the basis of which a decision is made are of great importance. Looking at the advantages of using explainable artificial intelligence in the decision-making process, one gets the impression that the application of such a model of neural networks can provide the necessary and sufficient conditions for the legal system to accept the use of artificial intelligence in decision-making in the judicial system.

Еще

Artificial Intelligence, Explainable Artificial Intelligence, AI in Courtroom, Legal System, Decision Making

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/170206560

IDR: 170206560   |   DOI: 10.23947/2334-8496-2024-12-3-561-569

Список литературы The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Judicial Systems

  • Berk, R. (2021). Artificial Intelligence, Predictive Policing, and Risk Assessment for Law Enforcement. Annual Review of Criminology. 4, 209-237. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-criminol-051520-012342 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-criminol-051520-012342
  • Bex, F., & Verheij, B. (2011). Legal shifts in the process of proof. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law. https://doi.org/10.1145/2018358.2018360 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2018358.2018360
  • El Ghosh, M., Naja, H., Abdulrab, H., & Khalil, M. (2017). Towards a legal rule-based system grounded on the integration of criminal domain ontology and rules. Procedia Computer Science, 112, 632–642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.08.109 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.08.109
  • Faghiri, A. (2022). The Use Of Artificial Intelligence In The Criminal Justice System (A Comparative Study). Webology. 19(5), 593-613.
  • Francisco, H., & Storbeck, M. (2022). Artificial intelligence and predictive policing: risks and challenges. EUCPN. 1-20.
  • Hamdani, R. E., Mustapha, M., Amariles, D. R., Troussel, A., Meeus, S., & Krasnashchok, K. (2021). A combined rule-based and machine learning approach for automated GDPR compliance checking. Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, 40-49. https://doi.org/10.1145/3462757.3466081 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3462757.3466081
  • Keane, M. T., & Kenny, E. M. (2019). How case-based reasoning explains neural networks: A theoretical analysis of XAI using post-hoc explanation-by-example from a survey of ANN-CBR twin-systems. In: Bach, K., Marling, C. (eds) Case-Based Reasoning Research and Development. ICCBR 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 11680. 155-171. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29249-2_11 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29249-2_11
  • Laptev, V.A., & Feyzrakhmanova, D.R. (2024). Application of Artifcial Intelligence in Justice: Current Trends and Future Prospects. Human-Centric Intelligent Systems 4, 394-405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44230-024-00074-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44230-024-00074-2
  • Marques M. J. (2020). A system of communication rules for justifying and explaining beliefs about facts in civil trials. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 28, 135–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-019-09247-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-019-09247-y
  • Mowbray, A., Chung, P., & Greenleaf G. (2023). Explainable AI (XAI) in Rules as Code (RaC): The DataLex approach. Computer Law & Security Review, 48, 105771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2022.105771 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2022.105771
  • Nakad, H., Jongbloed, T., Salem, A.B.M., & Van Den Herik, H.J. (2015). Digitally Produced Judgements in Modern Court Proceedings. International Journal of Digital Society (IJDS), 6(4), 1102-1112. https://doi.org/10.20533/ijds.2040.2570.2015.0135 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20533/ijds.2040.2570.2015.0135
  • Raphael Souza de O., Amilton S. R., & Sperandio Nascimento, E. G. (2022). Predicting the number of days in court cases using artificial intelligence. PLoS ONE, 17(5):e0269008. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0269008
  • Richmond, K. M., Muddamsetty, S. M., Gammeltoft Hansen, T., Olsen, H. P., & Moeslund, T. B. (2023). Explainable AI and Law: An Evidential Survey. Digital Society, 3(1), 1-33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44206-023-00081-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44206-023-00081-z
  • Rocha, C., & Carvalho, J.A. (2023). Artificial Intelligence in the Judiciary: Uses and Threats. Computer Science and En-gineering. https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-3399/paper17.pdf
  • Sajid, A.,Tamer, A., Shaker, E.,Khan, M.,Jose M. A., Roberto, C., Guidotti, R., Javier D. S., & Díaz- Rodríguez, N. (2023). Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): What we know and what is left to attain Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence. Information Fusion, 99, 101805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2023.101805 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2023.101805
  • Souza R. de O., Amilton S. R., & Nascimento, S. E. G. (2022). Predicting the number of days in court cases using artificial intelligence. PLoS ONE, 17(5):e0269008. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0269008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0269008
  • Shi, C., Sourdin, T., & Li, B. (2021). The Smart Court – A New Pathway to Justice in China?. International Journal for Court Administration 4, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.36745/ijca.367 DOI: https://doi.org/10.36745/ijca.367
  • Tamošiūnienė, E., Terebeiza, Ž., & Doržinkevič, A. (2024). The Possibility of Applying Artificial Intelligence in the Delivery of Justice by Courts. Baltic Journal of Law & Politics, 17 (1). https://doi.org/10.2478/bjlp-2024-0010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/bjlp-2024-0010
  • Vassiliades, A., Bassiliades, N., & Patkos, T. (2021). Argumentation and explainable artificial intelligence: A survey. The Knowledge Engineering Review, 36, e5. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0269888921000011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0269888921000011
  • Zheng, H., Grossi, D., & Verheij, B. (2021). Logical comparison of cases. AI Approaches to the Complexity of Legal Systems XI-XII: AICOL International Workshops 2018 and 2020: AICOL-XI@ JURIX 2018, AICOL-XII@ JURIX 2020, XAILA@ JURIX 2020, (Lecture Notes in Computer Science; Vol. 13048 (Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence), Springer, 125-140. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89811-3_9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89811-3_9
Еще
Статья научная
QR-код для установки приложения SciUp Наведите камеру и скачайте бесплатное приложение SciUp