Выбор шунта в коронарной хирургии

Автор: Зотов Александр Сергеевич, Анохин Алексей Владимирович, Аринчев Роман Сергеевич, Терещенко Василий Иванович, Шин Александр Радионович, Цветков Денис Сергеевич

Журнал: Клиническая практика @clinpractice

Рубрика: Обзоры

Статья в выпуске: 2 (22), 2015 года.

Бесплатный доступ

Результаты хирургического лечения ишемической болезни сердца, как непосредственные, так и отдаленные, напрямую зависят от состоятельности шунтов. Многообразие факторов, определяющих хорошее функционирование кондуита, ставит сложный вопрос перед хирургами: какой трансплантат выбрать в той или иной ситуации? В настоящей работе проанализированы недостатки и преимущества различных кондуитов, методик их применения, а также рассмотрены факторы, влияющие на состоятельность шунтов как в ближайшем, так и в отдаленном периоде.

Аортокоронарное шунтирование, маммарокоронарное шунтирование, кондуит, внутренняя грудная артерия, большая подкожная вена, лучевая артерия

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/14338526

IDR: 14338526

Список литературы Выбор шунта в коронарной хирургии

  • Акчурин Р.С. 50 лекций по хирургии. Хирургическое лечение ишемической болезни сердца -история и современность. Media-medica. 2007. C. 28-35.
  • Бокерия Л.А. Cравнительные отдаленные результаты полного артериального коронарного шунтирования и реваскуляризации внутренней грудной артерией и венами/Л.А. Бокерия, О. А. Коваленко, А.К. Ирасханов, Н.Г. Бенделиани//Бюллетень НЦССХ им. А.Н. Бакулева РАМН «Cердечно-сосудистые заболевания». 2012. T. 13, № 2. С. 49-57.
  • Коваленко О.А. Современные тенденции артериальной реваскуляризации миокарда/О.А. Коваленко, А.К. Ирасханов//Бюллетень НЦССХ им. А.Н. Бакулева РАМН «Cердечно-сосудистые заболевания». 2012. T. 13, № 2. С. 18-26.
  • Меньков И.А. Компьютерная томография в оценке проходимости артериальных и венозных коронарных шунтов в отдаленном послеоперационном периоде/И.А. Меньков, И. С. Железняк, С.Д. Рудь и др.//Радиология -практика. 2012. № 5. С. 24-30.
  • Семагин А.П. Использование большой подкожной вены у больных ишемической болезнью сердца при коронарном шунтировании: новые возможности/А.П. Семагин, Д.В. Кузнецов, П.В. Поляков и др.//Кардиология и сердечно-сосудистая хирургия. 2011. № 2. С. 4-6.
  • Семченко А.Н. Секвенциальное шунтирование в коронарной хирургии/А.Н. Семченко, Д.М. Галяутдинов, В.П. Васильев, В.Ю. Бондарь//Сибирский медицинский журнал. 2012. T. 27, № 4. C. 13-19.
  • Стражеско И.Д. Старение сосудов: основ-ные признаки и механизмы/И.Д. Стражеско, Д.У. Акашева, Е.Н. Дудинская, О.Н. Ткачева//Кардиоваскулярная терапия и профилактика. 2012. T. 11, № 4. P. 93-100.
  • C. Acar, A. Ramsheyi, J. Y. Pagny, et al. The radial artery for coronary artery bypass grafting: clinical and angiographic results at five years. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1998.; 116: 981-89.
  • H. Al-Sabti, A. Al-Kindi, K. Al-Rasadi, Y. Banerjee. Saphenous vein graft vs radial artery graft searching for the best second coronary artery bypass graft. The Journal of the Saudi Heart Association. 2013. Vol. 25. P. 247-54.
  • T. Athanasiou, S. Saso, C. Rao, et al. Radial artery versus saphenous vein conduits for coronary artery bypass surgery: forty years of competition -which conduit offers better patency? A systematic review and meta-analysis. The European Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery. 2011. Vol. 40. P. 208-20.
  • Barner H.B. Conduits for coronary bypass: arteries other than the internal thoracic artery's. The Korean Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2013. Vol.46. P. 165-77.
  • H.B. Barner, M. Bailey, T.J. Guthrie, et al. Radial artery free and T graft patency as coronary artery bypass conduit over a 15-year period. Circulation. 2012. Vol. 126 . P. 140-44.
  • B.F. Buxton, P.A.R. Hayward, A.E. Newcomb, et al. Choice of conduits for coronary artery bypass grafting: craft or science? The European Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery. 2009. Vol. 35. P. 658-70.
  • B.F. Buxton, S.D. Galvin. The history of arterial revascularization: from Kolesov to Tector and beyond. The Annals of Cardiothoracic Surgery. 2013. Vol. 2. P. 419-26.
  • B.F. Buxton, J. Tatoulis, J.A. Fuller. The right internal thoracic artery: the forgotten conduit -5,766 patients and 991 angiograms. The Annals of Cardiothoracic Surgery. 2011. Vol. 92. P. 9-17.
  • B.F. Buxton, P.A. Hayward. The art of arterial revascularization -total arterial revascularization in patients with triple vessel coronary artery disease. The Annals of Cardiothoracic Surgery. 2013. Vol. 2. P. 543-51.
  • B.F. Buxton, P. Ruengskulrach, J. Fuller, et al. The right internal thoracic artery graft -benefits of grafting the left coronary system and native vessels with a high-grade stenosis. The European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. 2000. Vol. 18. P. 255-61.
  • C. Cao, S.C. Ang, K. Wolak et al. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on mid-term angiographic outcomes for radial artery versus saphenous vein in coronary artery bypass graft surgery. The Annals of Cardiothoracic Surgery. 2013. Vol. 2. P. 401-407.
  • B.P. Choudhary, C. Antoniades, A.F. Brading, et al. Diabetes mellitus as a predictor for radial artery vasoreactivity in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007. Vol. 50. P. 1047-53.
  • P. Collins, C.M. Webb, C.F. Chong et al. Radial artery versus saphenous vein patency randomized trial: five-year angiographic follow-up. Circulation. 2008. Vol. 117. P. 2859-64.
  • S. Damgaard, J. Wetterslev, J.T. Lund et al. One-year results of total arterial revascularization vs. conventional coronary surgery: CARRPO trial. Euro Heart J. 2009. Vol. 30. P. 1005-11.
  • S. Deb, S.K. Singh, H. Tsubota et al. Influence of diabetes on long-term radial artery and saphenous vein graft patency after coronary artery bypass grafting surgery -A sub-study of the Multi-Centred Radial Artery Patency Study . AATS Annual Meeting 2014. URL: http://aats.org/annualmeeting/Program-Books/2014/L6.cgi S.
  • Deb EA. Cohen S.K. Singh, et al. Radial artery and saphenous vein patency more than 5 years after coronary artery bypass surgery. Results from RAPS (Radial Artery Patency Study). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012. Vol. 60. P. 28-35.
  • N.D. Desai, E.A. Cohen, C.D. Naylor, S.E. Fremes. A randomized comparison of radial-artery and saphenous-vein coronary bypass grafts. New Engl J Med. 2004. Vol. 351. P. 2302-09.
  • N.D. Desai, C.D. Naylor, A. Kiss, et al. Impact of patient and target-vessel characteristics on arterial and venous bypass graft patency: insight from a randomized trial. Circulation.2007. Vol. 115. P. 684-91.
  • M. Gaudino, C. Cellini, C. Pragliola, et al. Аrterial versus venous bypass grafts in patients with in-stent restenosis. Circulation. 2005. Vol. 112. P. I-265-I-269
  • G.P. Georghiou, B.A. Vidne, J. Dunning. Does the radial artery provide better long-term patency than the saphenous vein? Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery. 2005. Vol. 4. P. 304-310.
  • S. Goldman, G.K. Sethi, W. Holman, et al. Radial artery grafts vs saphenous vein grafts in coronary artery bypass surgery a randomized trial. The Journal of the American Medical Association. 2011. Vol. 305. P. 167-174.
  • Hayward P.A., B.F Buxton. Midterm results of the Radial Artery Patency and Clinical Outcomes randomized trial. The Annals of Cardiothoracic Surgery. 2013. Vol. 2. P. 458-66.
  • P.A. Hayward, D.L. Hare, I. Gordon, et al. Which arterial conduit? Radial artery versus free right internal thoracic artery: six-year clinical results of a randomized controlled trial. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery. 2007. Vol. 84. P. 493-97.
  • He G.W. Arterial grafts: clinical classification and pharmacological management. The Annals of Cardiothoracic Surgery. 2013. Vol. 2. P. 507-18.
  • D.M. Hoffman, K.R Dimitrova, H. DeCastro, et al. Improving long term outcome for diabetic patients undergoing surgical revascularization by use of the radial artery conduit: a propensity matched study. Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery. 2013;8:27.
  • T.M. Kieser, A.M. Lewin, M.M. Graham, et al. Оutcomes associated with bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting: the importance of age. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery. 2011. Vol. 92. P. 1269-76.
  • F.D. Loop, B.W. Lytle, D.M. Cosgrove, et al. Influence of the internal-mammary-artery graft on 10-year survival and other cardiac events. New Engl J Med 1986. Vol. 314. P. 1-6.
  • Lytle B.W. Bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting. The Annals of Cardiothoracic Surgery. 2013. Vol. 2. P. 485-92.
  • B.W. Lytle, E.H. Blackstone, J.F. Sabik et al. The effect of bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting on survival during 20 postoperative years. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery. 2004. Vol. 78. P. 2005-12.
  • B.W. Lytle, E.H. Blackstone, F.D. Loop, et al. Two internal thoracic artery grafts are better than one. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 1999. Vol. 117. P. 855-72.
  • H.S. Maniar, T.M. Sundt, H.B. Barner, et al. Effect of target stenosis and location on radial artery graft patency. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2002. Vol. 123. P. 45-52.
  • S. Mussa, B.P. Choudhary, D.P. Taggart. Radial artery conduits for coronary artery bypass grafting: current perspective. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2005. Vol. 129. P. 250-53.
  • A. Patel, S. Asopa, J. Dunning. Should patients receiving a radial artery conduit have post-operative calcium channel blockers. Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery. 2006. №5. Р. 251-57.
  • H.S. Paterson, R. Naidoo, K. Byth, et al. Full myocardial revascularization with bilateral internal mammary artery Y grafts. The Annals of Cardiothoracic Surgery. 2013. Vol. 2. P. 444-52.
  • R. Paulis, S. Notaris, R. Scaffa, et al. The effect of bilateral internal thoracic artery harvesting on superficial and deep sternal infection: The role of skeletonization. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2005. Vol. 129. P. 536-43.
  • J.F.I. Sabik, B.W. Lytle, E.H. Blackstone, et al. Comparison of saphenous vein and internal thoracic artery graft patency by coronary system. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery. 2005. Vol. 79. P. 544-51.
  • J.F.I. Sabik, B.W. Lytle, E.H. Blackstone, et al. Does competitive flow educe internal thoracic artery graft patency? The Annals of Thoracic Surgery. 2003. Vol. 7. P. 1490-96.
  • P. Shah, M. Durairaj, I. Gordon, et al. Factors affecting patency of internal thoracic artery graft: clinical and angiographic study in 1,434 symptomatic patients operated between 1982 and 2002. The European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. 2004. Vol. 26. P. 118-124.
  • S.K. Singh, N.D. Desai, S.D. Petroff, et al. The impact of diabetic status on coronary artery bypass graft patency. Insights from the Radial Artery Patency Study. Circulation. 2008. Vol. 118 . P. 222-25.
  • S.-W. Song, S.-Y. Sul, H.-J. Lee, and K.-J. Yoo. Comparison of the radial artery and saphenous vein as composite grafts in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in elderly patients: a randomized controlled trial. Korean Circulation Journal. 2012;42:107-112.
  • L.M. Stevens, M. Carrier, L.P. Perrault, et al. Single versus bilateral internal thoracic artery grafts with concomitant saphenous vein grafts for multivessel coronary artery bypass grafting: effects on mortality and event-free survival. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2004. Vol. 127. P. 1408-15.
  • Taggart D.P. Current status of arterial grafts for coronary artery bypass grafting. The Annals of Cardiothoracic Surgery. 2013. Vol. 2. P. 427-430.
  • D.P. Taggart, B. Lees, A. Gray, et al. Protocol for the Arterial Revascularisation Trial (ART). A randomised trial to compare survival following bilateral versus single internal mammary grafting in coronary revascularization. Trials. 2006;7:7.
  • D.P. Taggart, D.G. Altman, A.M. Gray, et al. Randomized trial to compare bilateral vs. single internal mammary coronary artery bypass grafting: 1-year results of the Arterial Revascularisation Trial (ART). Eur Heart J. 2010. Vol. 31. P. 2470-81.
  • J. Tatoulis, B.F. Buxton, J.A. Fuller. Patencies of 2,127 arterial to coronary conduits over 15 years. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery. 2004. Vol. 77. P. 93-101.
  • Tatoulis J. Total arterial coronary revascularization -patient selection, stenoses, conduits, targets. The Annals Cardiothoracic Surgery. 2013. Vol. 2. P. 499-506.
  • S.M. Wildhirt, B. Voss, F. Canal, et al. Graft function, histopathology and morphometry of radial arteries used as conduits for myocardial revascularization in patients beyond age 70. The European Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery. 2006. Vol. 30 P. 333-40.
  • H.U. Xiang, Z. Qiang. Systematic comparison of the effectiveness of radial artery and saphenous vein or right internal thoracic artery coronary bypass grafts in non-left anterior descending coronary arteries. The Journal of Zhejiang University-Science B (Biomedicine & Biotechnology). 2011. Vol. 12. P. 273-279.
Еще
Статья обзорная