What may statistics tell us about null subjects in Russian?

Бесплатный доступ

The article highlights the linguistic phenomenon of abandoning the expletively presented syntactic subject (the Subject Phenomenon) in different languages and focuses on its exemplification by the Russian language. It is shown that despite the existing number of studies on this issue, there is lack of precisely formulated criteria that determine the choice of linguistic means to represent a syntactic subject in the languages, which allow both options (partial subject languages). Based on the discussion of literature on the topic and on the statistical analysis of 16,718 sentence samples from the spoken language, print journalism, and fiction subcorpora of the Russian National Corpus, the article argues that the choice between and overt subjects in Russian sentences depends on factors such as tense, person, and style, but that this dependency is rather weak, owing to the fact that the Russian language system is now in the process of change. -subjectness is not an exclusive syntactic parameter and should be studied along with other aspects like semantics and pragmatics. The statistical data from this study support previously discussed diachronic and acquisition data, and confirm that languages do not nicely distribute themselves into distinct groups, but inhabit a constantly changing continuum.

Еще

Pro-drop languages, null subject, corpus study, syntax, continuum, syntactic subject, russian

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/149141042

IDR: 149141042   |   DOI: 10.15688/jvolsu2.2022.5.4

Список литературы What may statistics tell us about null subjects in Russian?

  • Barbosa P.M., 2011. Pro-Drop and Theories of Pro in the Minimalist Program. Part 2. Prornun Deletion Analyses of Null Subjects and Partial, Discourse and Semi Pro-Drop. Language and Linguistics Compass, vol. 5, iss. 8, pp. 571-587.
  • Barbosa P.M., 2019. Pro as a Minimal nP: Toward a Unified Approach to Pro-Drop. Linguistic Inquiry, vol. 50, iss. 3, pp. 487-526.
  • Bidese E., Tomaselli A., 2018. Developing Pro-Drop: The Case of Cimbrian. Cognola F., Casalicchio J., eds. Null Subjects in Generative Grammar: A Synchronic and Diachronic Perspective. Oxford, Oxford University Press, Oxford Scholarship Online. DOI: 10.1093/oso/ 9780198815853.003.0003
  • Bizarri C., 2015. Russian as a Partial Pro-Drop Language: Data and Analysis from a New Study. Annali di Ca 'Foscari. Serie occidentale, no. 49, pp. 335-362.
  • Bondarko A.V., 1971. Vid i vremya russlogo glagola [Tense and Aspect of Russian Verb]. Moscow, Prosveshchenie Publ. 239 p.
  • Camacho J.A., 2013. Null Subjects. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. 253 p.
  • Cardinaletti A., 2012. Afterword: On Clitic Omission and the Acquisition of Subject Clitic Pronouns. Larranaga P., Guijarro-Fuentes P., eds. Pronouns and Clitics in Early Language. Berlin, De Gruyter Mouton, pp. 283-303.
  • Cognola F., Casalicchio J., 2018. On the Null-Subject Phenomenon. Cognola F., Casalicchio J., eds. Null Subjects in Generative Grammar: A Synchronic and Diachronic Perspective. Oxford, Oxford University Press, Oxford Scholarship Online. DOI: 10.1093/oso/ 9780198815853.003.0001
  • D'Alessandro R., 2015. Null Subject. Fabregas A., Mateu J., Putnam M., eds. Contemporary Linguistic Parameters. London, Bloomsbury Press, pp. 201-226.
  • Duguine M., 2014. Argument Ellipsis: A Unitary Approach to Pro-Drop. The Linguistic Review, vol. 31, iss. 3-4, pp. 515-549.
  • Franks S., 1995. Parameters of SlavicMorphosyntax. New York, Oxford, Oxford University Press. 432 p.
  • Frascarelli M., Casentini M., 2019. The Interpretation of Null Subjects in a Radical Pro-Drop Language: Topic Chains and Discourse-Semantic Requirements in Chinese. Studies in Chinese Linguistics, vol. 40, iss. 1, pp. 1-45.
  • Gordishevsky G., Avrutin S., 2003. Subject and Object Omissions in Child Russian. Proceedings of IATL 19 (Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, 16-17 June 2003). URL: http://linguistics.huji. ac.il/IATL/19/GordishevskyAvrutin.pdf
  • Haider H., 2019. On Absent, Expletive, and Non-Referential Subjects. Herbeck P., Bernhard Pöll B., Wolfsgruber A.C., eds. Semantic and Syntactic Aspects of Impersonality. Hamburg, Helmut Buske Verlag, pp. 11-46.
  • Holmberg A., 2005. Is There a Little Pro? Evidence from Finnish. Linguistic Inquiry, vol. 36, pp. 533-564.
  • Holmberg A., 2016. Null Subjects in Finnish and the Typology of Pro-Drop. Tamm A., Vainikka A., eds. Uralic Syntax. URL: https://andersholmberg 92428242.files.wordpress.com/2020/04/ holmberg-to-appear.-null-subjects-in-finnish-and-the-typology-of-pro-drop.pdf
  • Holmberg A., Nayudu A., Sheehan M., 2009. Three Partial Nullsubject Languages: A Comparison of Brazilian Portuguese, Finnish and Marathi. Studia Linguistica, vol. 63, pp. 59-97.
  • Huang C.-T.J., 1984. On the Distribution and Reference of Empty Pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry, vol. 15, pp. 531-574.
  • Kasevich V.B., 2004. Nuli, Ellipsis, etc. [Nulls, Ellipsis, etc.]. Verbitskaya L.A., ed. Teoreticheskie problemy lingvistiki: k 140-letiyu kafedry obshchego yazykoznaniya Sankt-Peter-burgskogo universiteta [Theoretical Problems of Linguistics: To the 140th Anniversary of the Department of General Linguistics at St Petersburg University]. Saint Petersburg, St. Petersburg University Press, pp. 196-208.
  • Kinn K., Rusten K.A., Walkden G., 2016. Null Subjects in Early Icelandic. Journal of Germanic Linguistics, vol. 28, iss. 1, pp. 31-78.
  • Lindseth M., 1998. Null-Subject Properties of Slavic Languages: With Special Reference to Russian, Czech, andSorbian. München, Otto Sagner. 215 p.
  • Madariaga N., 2018. Diachronic Change and the Nature of Pronominal Null Subjects: The Case of Russian. Cognola F., Casalicchio J., eds. Null Subjects in Generative Grammar: A Synchronic and Diachronic Perspective. Oxford, Oxford University Press, Oxford Scholarship Online. DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780198815853.003.0007
  • McShane M., 2009. Subject Ellipsis in Russian and Polish. Studia Linguistica, vol. 63, pp. 98-132.
  • Nagy N. G., Aghdasi N., Denis D., Motut A., 2011. Null Subjects in Heritage Languages: Contact Effects in a Cross-Linguistic Context. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, vol. 17, iss. 2, art. 16.
  • Perlmutter D.M., Moore J., 2002. Language-Internal Explanation: The Distribution of Russian Impersonals. Language, vol. 78, pp. 619-650.
  • Pinto M., 2006. Subject Pronouns in Bilinguals: Interference or Maturation? Torrens V., Escobar L., eds. The Acquisition of Syntax in Romance Languages, Amsterdam, John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 331-352.
  • Rizzi L., 1982. Issues in Italian Syntax. Dordrecht, Foris. 188 p.
  • Rosenkvist H., 2018. Null Subjects and Distinct Agreement in Modern Germanic. Cognola F., Casalicchio J., eds. Null Subjects in Generative Grammar: A Synchronic and Diachronic Perspective. Oxford, Oxford University Press, Oxford Scholarship Online. DOI: 10.1093/oso/ 9780198815853.003.0012
  • Rûzicka R., 1986. Funkcionirovanie i klassifikatsia pustykh kategoriy v russkom literaturnom yazyke [Functions and Classification of Empty Categories in Russian Standard Language]. Zeitschrift für Slavistik, vol. 31, pp. 388-392.
  • Simonenko A., Crabbé B., Prévost S., 2018. Text Form and Grammatical Changes in Medieval French: A Treebank-Based Diachronic Study. DIACHRONICA, vol. 35, iss. 3, pp. 393-428.
  • Tseytlin S.N., 1976. Stroenie predlozheniya i rechevaya situatsia (k probleme elliptichnosti predlozheniya) [The Structure of Sentence and the Situation of Communication (To the Problem of Elliptic Sentences)]. Funktsionalny analiz grammaticheskikh kategoriy i edinits [Functional Analysis of Grammatical Categories and Elements]. Leningrad, Herzen Institute Publishing House, pp. 37-46
  • Wratil M., 2011. Uncovered Pro - On the Development and Identification of Null Subjects. Wratil M., Gallmann P., eds. Null Pronouns. Berlin, Walter de Gruyter, pp. 99-140.
Еще
Статья научная