Western signs and eastern hieroglyphs

Subject of study . If in the title of the article the word “Western” is changed to “semantics” and “Eastern” to “hermeneutics”, it turns out that the semantics (of the West) suggests a system of signs that can be both positive and negative, sacral and profane, true and false. And hermeneutics (east) in the interpretation of the hieroglyph expands the immanent boundaries to transcendent in the search for the meaning of life. Transcendental epistemology of the sign and hieroglyph . The existential decoding of the distinction between the East and the West gives a schematic representation of the way to express thoughts. The West separates "one from another", while the East collects "one in another." The image of the matryoshka and the way of modeling a single sound in the Orthodox prayer confirm that Russia is also East. Justification of a single Eastern and Western ancestral homeland . The hypothesis of the ancestral home of the Slavs and the relocation of European regions from the Wislo-Oder, Middle Dnieper or Danube (Danube-Balkan) regions testifies to the conventionality of the change of East and West. The confession of Christianity in the West and the East brings together our cultures into a single global whole. The genesis of the development and dying of culture occurs in the same way both in the West and in the East. As the West is present in the East, so is the East present in the West. Delimitation of East and West . Civilizational faults underlie the contradictions of the East and the West, but not so much in terms of geography as in the spiritual and moral state. And if this message is correct, the preservation of parity in international relations will consist in the choice of society of a dilemma: to remain consumerist and then increase tension or strive for communitarianism in order to accept each other as they are. The colonial ambitions of the West create tension in relations between states and the threat of becoming a satellite country with a loss of sovereignty. In the conclusions we propose to delimit the methodology for the East and the West as two approaches complementary, and at the same time mutually exclusive. This is necessary to respect the principle of humanity and preserve the unique East. The East does not find comfort in the detached indifference of signs. He yearns for measures to approve axiologically accentuated information with the return of the national mentality, social significance and autochthonous ethnicity.