Academic writing at a technical university: a qualitative study of paraphrasing strategies

Бесплатный доступ

the formation of paraphrasing skills is of utmost importance in teaching academic writing in a foreign (second) language to PhD students of a technical, as well as any other, university. The present study explores the paraphrasing strategies employed by first-year second language (L2) PhD students (n = 22) of MEPhI when completing a writing assignment. The qualitative analysis of the student-generated summaries of a fragment from an academic paper revealed weaknesses in L2 students’ paraphrases including the underrepresentation of substantially revised texts, overrepresenta-tion of lexico-semantic transformations and misinterpretation of the original meaning of the source text. The results of the survey demonstrated that the majority of the students experienced difficulties when trying to find other ways of expressing the same idea without copying directly from the source text. The study enables a better understanding of paraphrase use in L2 academic writing.

Еще

Paraphrasing, academic language, academic writing, second language (l2) teaching, higher education

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/147241415

IDR: 147241415   |   DOI: 10.15393/j5.art.2023.8651

Текст научной статьи Academic writing at a technical university: a qualitative study of paraphrasing strategies

Paraphrasing is generally considered to be an essential skill for scientific writing. Paraphrasing is crucial for mindful borrowing of other authors’ ideas while writing a literature review and for providing evidence of the relevance and novelty of scientific research. Several authors have explored how mastering various paraphrasing techniques allows writers to avoid plagiarism and focused on various strategies employed by students at different levels to reproduce original texts in their own words. Thus, Kettel and DeFauw [1] presented the «Read, Reread, List, Compose» (RRLC) strategy to write from a bulleted list of words or phrases containing the most essential details of the source text. Keck [2] identified the main grammatical strategies of paraphrase and emphasized that further investigation into such practices will enable a better understanding of ways to avoid plagiarism. Shi [3] highlights that such a basic academic literacy skill as paraphrasing is in fact complex and to a large extent depends on students’ knowledge of the content of the source text, the established norms of citation practices in the discipline and the rhetorical purposes of using citations in specific contexts.

Paraphrasing is particularly important when writing academic works in the second language (L2) as the lack of language proficiency may result in excessive borrowing. Many authors have contributed to this field. Hirvela and Du [4] explored the paraphrasing strategies used by Chinese undergraduate ESL students. Keck [5; 6] compared the ways in which L1 and L2 writers treat paraphrasing. Shi [3] analyzed paraphrases by L2 students from China, Japan and Korea and suggested the significance of both linguistic and content knowledge in rewriting original texts. Unfortunately, little is known about the paraphrasing techniques employed by Russian writers. In this paper, we aim to fill this gap as it could expand the views of the scientific community on L2 academic writing as a whole. We explore the main strategies of rewriting a source text used by Russian novice academic writers and identify problematic areas in their paraphrases. We seek to inform writing teachers of the most common strategies and difficulties arising in paraphrases so that they could advise L2 students accordingly.

Список литературы Academic writing at a technical university: a qualitative study of paraphrasing strategies

  • Kettel R. P. Paraphrase without plagiarism: use RRLC (Read, Reread, List, Compose). The Reading Teacher. 2018. Vol. 72. No. 2. P. 245-255. DOI: 10.1002/trtr.1697
  • Keck C. How do university students attempt to avoid plagiarism? A grammatical analysis of undergraduate paraphrasing strategies. Writing and Pedagogy. 2010. Vol. 2. No. 2. P. 193‒222. DOI: 10.1558/wap.v2i2.193
  • Shi L. Rewriting and paraphrasing source texts in second language writing. Journal of Second Language Writing. 2021. Vol. 21. No. 2. P. 134‒148. DOI: 10.1016/j.jslw.2012.03.003
  • Hirvela A, Du Q. «Why am I paraphrasing?»: undergraduate ESL writers’ engagement with source-based academic writing and reading. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 2013. Vol. 12. No. 2. P. 87‒98. DOI: 10.1016/j.jeap.2012.11.005
  • Keck C. The use of paraphrase in summary writing: a comparison of L1 and L2 writers. Journal of Second Language Writing. 2006. Vol. 15. No. 4. P. 261‒278 DOI: 10.1016/j.jslw.2006.09.006
  • Keck C. Copying, paraphrasing and academic writing development: a re-examination of L1 and L2 summarization practices. Journal of Second Language Writing. 2014. Vol. 25. P. 4‒22. DOI: 10.1016/j.jslw.2014.05.005
  • Rossi S. L. Revisioning paraphrasing instruction. In: Eaton S. E., Christensen Hughes J. (Eds.), Academic Integrity in Canada. Ethics and Integrity in Educational Contexts. Cham, 2022. Vol. 1. P. 411‒429. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-83255-1_21
  • Rustan E., Thaha H. Decreased plagiarism behavior in academic writing by using reflective writing. International Journal of Society, Culture & Language. 2023. P. 1‒18. DOI: 10.22034/ijscl.2023.2002642.3037
  • Alvi F., Stevenson M., Clough P. Paraphrase type identification for plagiarism detection using contexts and word embeddings. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher education. 2021. Vol. 18. Art. 42. DOI: 10.1186/s41239-021-00277-8
  • Choi Y. H. Paraphrase practices for using sources in L2 academic writing. English Teaching. 2012. Vol. 67. No. 2. P. 51‒79.
  • Chien S. C. Cultural constructions of plagiarism in student writing. Research in the Teaching of English. 2014. Vol. 49. No. 2. P. 120‒140.
  • Hu G., Lei J. Plagiarism in English academic writing: a comparison of Chinese university teachers' and students' understandings and stances. System. 2016. Vol. 56. P. 107‒118. DOI: 10.1016/j.system.2015.12.003
  • Mori M. Our speech is filled with others’ words: understanding university student and instructor opinions towards paraphrasing through a Bakhtinian lens. Ampersand. 2018. Vol. 5. P. 45‒54. DOI: 10.1016/j.amper.2018.11.002
  • Escudero I., Fuertes N., López L. Paraphrasing strategy in EFL Ecuadorian B1 students and implications on reading comprehension. English Language Teaching. 2019. Vol. 12. No. 1. P. 56‒66.
  • Tran T. T. T., Nguyen H. B. The effects of paraphrasing on EFL Students’ academic writing. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies. 2022. Vol. 18. No. 1. P. 976‒987. DOI: 10.52462/jlls.233
  • Anderson E. C., Vanderhoff A. M., Donovick P. J. A manifestation of the bilingual disadvantage in college-level writing. International Journal of Language Studies. 2013. Vol. 7. No. 1. P. 135‒150.
  • Carhill-Poza A., Chen J. Adolescent English learners’ language development in technology-enhanced classrooms. Language Learning and Technology. 2020. Vol. 24. No. 3. P. 52‒69.
  • Bhagat R., Hovy E. What is a paraphrase? Computational Linguistics. 2013. Vol. 39. No. 3. P. 463‒472. DOI: 10.1162/COLI_a_00166
  • Vila M., Marti M. A., Rodriguez H. Paraphrase concept and typology. A linguistically based and computationally oriented approach. Procesamiento del Lenguaje Natural. 2011. Vol. 46. P. 83‒90. DOI: 10.1016/j.jslw.2012.03.003
  • Vila M., Bertran M., Marti M. A., Rodriguez H. Corpus annotation with paraphrase types: new annotation scheme and inter-annotator agreement measures. Language Resources and Evaluation. 2015. Vol. 49. P. 77‒105.
  • Mariani M., Rahayu P. S., Nor H. Paraphrasing strategies in higher education. Proceedings of the International Conference on Education of Suryakancana. 2021. P. 418‒428. DOI: 10.35194/cp.v0i0.1380
  • Çeşme H. Exploring paraphrase performances and strategies of graduate student writing. Shanlax International Journal of Education. 2022. Vol. 11. No. 1. P. 10‒23. DOI: 10.34293/education.v11i1.5247
  • Ismail I., Sunubi A. H., Halidin A., Amzah A., Nanning N., Kaharuddin K. Paraphrasing technique to develop skill for English writing among Indonesian college students of English. Systematic Reviews in Pharmacy. 2020. Vol. 11. No. 11. P. 291‒297.
  • Hyytinen H., Löfström E., Lindblom-Ylänne S. Challenges in argumentation and paraphrasing among beginning students in educational sciences. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research. 2017. Vol. 61. No. 4. P. 411‒429. DOI: 10.1080/00313831.2016.1147072
Еще
Статья научная