Factors for increasing motivation to theory class attendance among students of technology studies

Автор: Droessiger Grazina, Vdovinskiene Sonata

Журнал: Интеграция образования @edumag-mrsu

Рубрика: Социология образования

Статья в выпуске: 1 (98), 2020 года.

Бесплатный доступ

Introduction. The article examines factors for a potential increase in student motivation to theory class attendance. Scientific research presents various factors for students' non-attendance, beginning with personal reasons and nuances of study organization and ending with the teacher approach to their work. This article looks specifically into the factors controlled by the teacher, more precisely, their competences. Materials and Methods. The qualitative study was conducted in the academic year 2018-2019, through the analysis of study motivation opinions of Vilnius Gediminas Technical University students majoring in technology studies. The article presents the analysis of one aspect of the conducted survey, i.e., what teachers could or should do to motivate students to attend theory classes. Results. The processed data indicated that students link motivation to study to three primary teaching competences: the didactic, communicative and personal ones. According to students, the teaching staff's didactic competence should include the ability to create a reasonable balance between theory and practical application, the capability to visually present and impart focal points of the study material, the capacity to plan out lectures, the skill to apply interactive studying methods, and the potential to motivate students by introducing accumulative bonus grades. Discussion and Conclusion. While there was a clear differentiation between three teacher competences, the weight placed on each one differs. The didactic competence carries the most weight, and teachers should, therefore, reflect on whether they establish an optimal state of balance between theory and praxis; prepare visually appealing lectures, and consistently and structurally convey the study material, etc.

Еще

Technology studies, student motivation, non-attendance, theory lectures, teachers' competences

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/147220736

IDR: 147220736   |   DOI: 10.15507/1991-9468.098.024.202001.050-061

Список литературы Factors for increasing motivation to theory class attendance among students of technology studies

  • Schneider M., Mustafic M. [Good Higher Education: An Evidence-Based Orientation Guide. How to Effectively Structure Lectures, Seminars, and Projects]. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer; 2015. (In Germ.) DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-45062-8
  • Kremenkova L., Kvintova J. Generational and Sex Differences in Relation to Empathy among Pre-Graduate Teachers. The European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences. 2017. p. 956-965. (In Eng.) DOI: 10.15405/epsbs.2017.10.91
  • Kirikova L., Bruneviciute R., Gudaityte D., Sveikauskas V., Ramanauskas I. Advantages and Downsides of the Problem-Based Learning Process: Teachers' Approach. Coactivity: Philology, Educology. 2013; 21(1):24-34. (In Lith., abstract in Eng.) DOI: 10.3846/cpe.2013.03
  • Bencsik H.A. The Most Preferred Methods in Higher Education. The European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences. 2017. p. 305-319. (In Eng.) DOI: 10.15405/epsbs.2017.10.29
  • Treseviciene M., Gedviliene G., Zuzeviciute V. [Andragogy]. Kaunas: VDU; 2006. 352 p. (In Lith.)
  • Deci E.L., Ryan R.M. Self-Determination Theory: A Macrotheory of Human Motivation, Development, and Health. Canadian Psychology. 2008; 49(3):182-185. (In Eng.)
  • DOI: 10.1037/a0012801
  • Deci E.L., Ryan R.M. Self-Determination Theory and the Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development, and Well-Being. American Psychologist. 2000; 55(1):68-78. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi. org/10.1037110003-066X.55.1.68
  • Billings-Gagliardi S., Mazor K.M. Student Decisions about Lecture Attendance: Do Electronic Course Materials Matter? Academic Medicine. 2007; 82(10):73-76. (In Eng.)
  • DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31813e651e
  • Bati A.H., Mandiracioglu A., Orgun F., Govsa F. Why do Students Miss Lectures? A Study of Lecture Attendance Amongst Students of Health Science. Nurse Education Today. 2013; 33(6):596-601. (In Eng.)
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2012.07.010
  • Kottasz R. Reasons for Student Non-Attendance at Lectures and Tutorials: An Analysis. Investigations in University Teaching and Learning. 2005; 2(2):5-16. Available at: https://core.ac.uk/download/ pdf/36771681.pdf (accessed 02.03.2018). (In Eng.)
  • Westrick S.C., Helms K.L., McDonough S.K., Breland M.L. Factors Influencing Pharmacy Students' Attendance Decisions in Large Lectures. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education. 2009; 73(5):83. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2739066 (accessed 08.03.2019). (In Eng.)
  • Kusurkar R.A., Croiset G., Ten Cate, Th.J. Twelve Tips to Stimulate Intrinsic Motivation in Students through Autonomy-Supportive Classroom Teaching Derived from Self-Determination Theory. Medical Teacher. 2011; 33(12):978-982. (In Eng.)
  • DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2011.599896
  • Persky A.M., Kirwin J.L., Marasco, S.J., May D.B., Skomo M.L., Kennedy K.B. Classroom Attendance: Factors and Perceptions of Students and Faculty in US Schools of Pharmacy. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning. 2014; 6(1):1-9. (In Eng.)
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.cptl.2013.09.014
  • Rijavec M., Miljkovic D. Reasons for Missing Classes in College; the Role of Personality Traits. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2015; 205:480-484. (In Eng.)
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.09.046
  • Franc М. The Dimensions of Creativity in Technical Education. Integration of Education. 2016; 20(2):245-253. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
  • DOI: 10.15507/1991-9468.083.020.201602.245-253
  • Rupsiene L. [Data Collection Methodology of Qualitative Research]. Klaipeda: KU; 2007. 157 p. (In Lith.)
  • Yilmaz K. Comparison of Quantitative and Qualitative ResearchTraditions: Epistemological, Theoretical, and Methodological Differences. European Journal of Education. 2013; 48(2):311-325. (In Eng.)
  • DOI: 10.1111/ejed.12014
  • Cope D.G. Methods and Meanings: Credibility and Trustworthiness of Qualitative Research. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2014; 41(1):89-91. (In Eng.)
  • DOI: 10.1188/14.ONF.89-91
  • Elo S., Kaariainen M., Kanste O., Polkki T., Utriainen K., Kyngas H. Qualitative Content Analysis: A Focus on Trustworthiness. Sage Open. 2014; 4(1):1-10. (In Eng.)
  • DOI: 10.1177/215824401452263
  • Meshkov N.I. Motivation as the Key Problem of Personality Psychology. Integration of Education. 2015; 19(1):37-43. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
  • DOI: 10.15507/Inted.078.019.201501.037
  • Capiene A., Merkiene R. Students Motivation Factors and Measures to Ensure Active Participation in Entrepreneurship Educational Practice. Management Theory and Studies for Rural Business and Infrastructure Development. 2014; 36(2):244-254. Available at: http://mts.asu.lt/mtsrbid/article/view/817/841 (accessed 25.03.2019). (In Lith, abstract in Eng.)
  • Swanson E., McCulley L.V., Osman, D.J., Scammacca N.L., Solis M. The Effect of Team-Based Learning on Content Knowledge: A Meta-Analysis. Active Learning in Higher Education. 2019; 20(1): 39-50. (In Eng.)
  • DOI: 10.1177/1469787417731201
  • Navickiene V., Sedereviciute-Paciauskiene Z., Valantinaite I., Zilinskaite-Vytiene V. The Relationship between Communication and Education through the Creative Personality of the Teacher. Creativity studies. 2019; 12(1):49-60. (In Eng.)
  • DOI: 10.3846/cs.2019.6472
  • Galkiene A. Image of a Modern Teacher in Pupils' Perception. Pedagogy Studies. 2011; 101:82-90. Available at: https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=54740 (accessed 30.03.2019). (In Lith., abstract in Eng.)
  • Kember D., Leung D.Y., McNaught C. A Workshop Activity to Demonstrate that Approaches to Learning are Influenced by the Teaching and Learning Environment. Active Learning in Higher Education. 2008; 9(1):43-56. (In Eng.)
  • DOI: 10.1177/1469787407086745
  • Gevorgianiene V. The Significance of Personal Competencies in the Work of an Interdisciplinary Team. Social Theory, Empirics, Policy and Practice. 2014; 9:81-93. (In Lith., abstract in Eng.)
  • DOI: 10.15388/STEPP.2014.0.3775
Еще
Статья научная