Heuristic Evaluation of the use of Blackboard & Facebook Groups in Computing Higher Education
Автор: Dawn Carmichael, Claire MacEachen
Журнал: International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science (IJMECS) @ijmecs
Статья в выпуске: 6 vol.9, 2017 года.
Бесплатный доступ
The features of social media sites make them potentially effective as a learning platform for student communication and collaboration in higher education. Moreover it has become apparent that student Facebook users have been repurposing its features to fit their academic requirements. This study aims to determine if Facebook Groups and the Blackboard Learning Management System (LMS) can enhance the learner experience, and if so, in what way. The study made use of a heuristic evaluation with an educationally relevant criteria set [1]. The results, amongst other things, indicate that Facebook Groups are more useful for peer-to-peer communication than Blackboard, probably due to the notification system in Facebook. Analysis indicated that in some instances the strengths and weaknesses of Blackboard and Facebook were complementary and therefore could, arguably, improve the overall student experience.
Facebook, Learning Management Systems, E-Learning, Higher Education, Heuristics, Computing Education
Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/15014973
IDR: 15014973
Список литературы Heuristic Evaluation of the use of Blackboard & Facebook Groups in Computing Higher Education
- B. M. Whale, A. P. Sholtz, and A. M. Calitz, “Classification of Heuristics for Components of e-Learning,” in Saicsit 2015, 2015, no. 43.
- J. Nielsen, “Progressive Disclosure,” nngroup.com, 2006. [Online]. Available: https://www.nngroup.com/articles/progressive-disclosure/. [Accessed: 03-Apr-2017].
- R. E. Wilson, S. D. Gosling, and L. T. Graham, “A review of Facebook research in the social sciences.,” Perspect. Psychol. Sci., vol. 7, 2012.
- D. Tam, “Facebook by the numbers: 1.06 billion monthly active users,” 2013. [Online]. Available: http://news.cnet.com/8301-103_3-57566550-93/facebook-by-the-numbers-1.06-billion-monthlyactive-users/.
- Facebook, “Press Room Statistics,” Facebook, 2016. [Online]. Available: http://www.facebook.com/press/info.php?statistics.
- D. M. Boyd and N. B. Ellison, “Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship,” J. Comput. Commun., vol. 13, no. 1, Oct. 2007.
- D. Beer, “Social network(ing) sites...revisiting the story so far: A response to Danah Boyd & Nicole Ellison,” J. Comput. Commun., vol. 13, 2008.
- S. Lonn and S. D. Teasley, “Saving time or innovating practice: Investigating perceptions and uses of Learning Management Systems,” Comput. Educ., vol. 53, 2009.
- P. A. Kirschner and A. C. Karpinski, “Facebook® and academic performance.,” Comput. Human Behav., vol. 26, no. 6, 2010.
- R. Junco, “The relationship between frequency of Facebook use, participation in Facebook activities, and student engagement,” Comput. Educ., vol. 58, no. 1, Jan. 2012.
- N. . Ellison, “‘Social Networking Sites’ Students and Information Technology,” in ECAR Research Study 8, 2008.
- N. Selwyn, “Screw Blackboard… do it on Facebook!’ An investigation of students’ educational use of Facebook,” in Poke 1.0 – Facebook social research symposium, 2007.
- S. Khan and S. Tahir Bakhsh, “A Study on the Role of Facebook in E-Learning,” Int. J. Educ. Manag. Eng., vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 1–11, Oct. 2015.
- G. Alsop and C. Tompsett, “Grounded Theory as an approach to studying students’ uses of learning management systems,” Assoc. Learn. Technol. Journa, vol. 10, 2002.
- S. Griffith and L. Liyanage, “An introduction to the potential of social networking sites in education,” in Proceedings of the Emerging Technologies Conference, 2008.
- N. Jones, H. Blackey, K. Fitzgibbon, and E. Chew, “Get out of MySpace!,” Comput. Educ., vol. 53, 2009.
- S. Cloete, C. de Villiers, and S. Roodt, “Facebook as an academic tool for ICT lecturers,” in Proceedings of the 2009 Annual Conference of the Southern African Computer Lecturers’ Association, 2009.
- M. Maranto, G. & Barton, “Paradox and Promise: MySpace, Facebook, and the Sociopolotics of Social Networking in the Writing Classroom,” vol. 27, 2010.
- N. B. Ellison, “Facebook Use on Campus: A Social Capital Perspective on Social Network Sites,” in ECAR Symposium, 2007.
- N. Ellison, C. Steinfield, and C. Lampe, “The Benefits of Facebook ‘Friends:’ Social Capital and College Students’ Use of Online Social Network Sites,” J. Comput. Commun., vol. 12, no. 4, Jul. 2007.
- A. Schroeder, S. Minocha, and C. Schneider, “The strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats of using social software in higher and further education teaching and learning,” J. Comput. Assist. Learn., vol. 26, no. 3, 2010.
- B. Dyson, K. Vickers, J. Turtle, S. Cowan, and A. Tassone, “Evaluating the use of Facebook to increase student engagement and understanding in lecture-based classes,” High. Educ., vol. 69, no. 2, Feb. 2015.
- A. Fontana, “The Multichronic Classroom: Creating an Engaging Environment for All Students,” J. Found. Art Theory Educ. - FATE Rev., vol. 30, 2010.
- H. Bicen and N. Cavus, “Social network sites usage habits of undergraduate students: Case study of Facebook,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 28, 2011.
- R. Wang, P. Scown, C. Urquhart, and J. Hardman, “Tapping the educational potential of Facebook: Guidelines for use in higher education,” Educ. Inf. Technol., vol. 19, no. 1, Mar. 2014.
- J. Nielsen, “Usability Inspection Methods,” in CHI ’95 Mosaic of Creativity, 1995.
- W. Queensbery, The five dimensions of usability. NJ: Mahwah, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2003.
- S. Sternad and S. Bobek, “Impacts of TAM-based External Factors on ERP Acceptance,” Procedia Technol., vol. 9, 2013.
- Á. Dunne, M. A. Lawlor, and J. Rowley, “Young people’s use of online social networking sites - a uses and gratifications perspective,” J. Res. Interact. Mark., vol. 4, no. 1, 2010.
- I. Fares Al-Mashaqbeh, “Facebook Applications to Promote Academic Engagement: Student " s Attitudes towards the Use of Facebook as a Learning Tool,” I.J. Mod. Educ. Comput. Sci. Mod. Educ. Comput. Sci., vol. 11, no. 11, pp. 60–66, 2015.
