Preservice Teachers’ Level of Knowledge on Elements and Rationale for Nature of Science: Towards Advancing Quality Instruction

Автор: Olalekan Taofeek Badmus, Loyiso C. Jita

Журнал: International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education @ijcrsee

Рубрика: Original research

Статья в выпуске: 1 vol.12, 2024 года.

Бесплатный доступ

This study investigates preservice teachers’ knowledge of elements and rationale for Nature of Science (NOS). Skill gap is established in the literature on pedagogical practices of preservice as well as novice teachers of science, reflecting deficiency in their professional training and eventual classroom practice. Examining preservice teachers’ knowledge in these aspects (elements & rationale) of NOS through a quasi-experiment of one-group pretest and post-test design was done. Instructional intervention over two years along with assignments and presentation with researchers as moderators on the science pedagogy module (History of Science and Philosophy of Science) serves as stimuli over the period. Three research questions and two hypotheses were raised to guide this study. One hundred and thirty-six (112 Life Science and 24 Physical Science) preservice teachers were the participants. Element of NOS (ENOS) and Rationale for NOS (RNOS) were the instruments. Reliability of the instruments yielded Cronbach alpha values of .83, .91 and .86 across dimensions of clarity, coherence and relevance by fifteen experienced science educators. Data was analysed using t-test and ANCOVA. The study found the intervention to effectively improve the knowledge of elements and rationale for NOS. Better prepared teachers (More Knowledge Order [MKO] have the potential to improved Zone of Proximal Development [ZPD] in learners) by implication have the competence to guide learners for qualitative and effective learning. The instruments in this study is recommended for foundational training of preservice teachers on NOS for enhanced instruction.

Еще

Elements, NOS, preservice reachers, rationale, instruction

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/170202070

IDR: 170202070   |   DOI: 10.23947/2334-8496-2024-12-1-77-87

Список литературы Preservice Teachers’ Level of Knowledge on Elements and Rationale for Nature of Science: Towards Advancing Quality Instruction

  • Abd-El-Khalick, F. S., & Akerson, V. L. (2004). Learning as conceptual change: Factors mediating the development of preservice elementary teachers’ views of nature of science. Science Education, 88, 785–810. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10143 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10143
  • Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). The influence of history of science courses on students’ views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,37, 1057–1095. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200012)37:10<1057::AID-TEA3-3.0.CO;2-C DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200012)37:10<1057::AID-TEA3-3.3.CO;2-3
  • Alameh, S., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2018). Towards a philosophically guided schema for studying scientific explanation in science education. Science & Education, 27(9–10), 831–861. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-018-0021-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-018-0021-9
  • Alameh, S., Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Brown, D. (2023). The Nature of Scientific Explanation: Examining the perceptions of the nature, quality, and “goodness” of explanation among college students, science teachers, and scientists. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 60(1), 100-135. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21792 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21792
  • Allchin, D. (2017). Beyond the consensus view: whole science. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 17, 18-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/14926156.2016.1271921 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14926156.2016.1271921
  • Badmus, O. T., & Jita, L. C. (2022). Didactic Handout on Nature of Science: Toward Effective Teaching of Physical Science Curriculum. Science Education International, 33(3), 306-312. https://doi.org/10.33828/sei.v33.i3.6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33828/sei.v33.i3.6
  • Bartos, S. A., & Lederman, N. G. (2014). Teachers’ knowledge structures for nature of science and scientific inquiry: Conceptions and classroom practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(9), 1150–1184. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21168 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21168
  • Bell, R. L., Mulvey, B. K., & Maeng, J. L. (2016). Outcomes of nature of science instruction along a context continuum: Preservice secondary science teachers’ conceptions and instructional intentions. International Journal of Science Education, 38(3), 493-520. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1151960 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1151960
  • Clough, M. P. (2018). Teaching and learning about nature of science. Science & education, 27, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-018-9964-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-018-9964-0
  • Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2000). Research Methods in Education (5th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203224342 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203224342
  • Erduran, S. (2006). Promoting ideas, evidence and argument in initial science teacher training. School Science Review, 87(321), 45.
  • Hanuscin, D. (2013). Critical incidents in the development of pedagogical content knowledge for teaching the nature of science: A prospective elementary teacher’s journey. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24(6), 933–956. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-013-9341-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-013-9341-4
  • Kahn, S., & Zeidler, D. L. (2019). A conceptual analysis of perspective taking in support of socioscientific reasoning. Science & Education, 28, 605-638. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-019-00044-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-019-00044-2
  • Khishfe, R. (2022). Nature of Science and Argumentation Instruction in socioscientific and scientific contexts. International Journal of Science Education, 44(4), 647-673. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2022.2050488 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2022.2050488
  • Khishfe, R. (2019). The transfer of nature of science understandings: A question of similarity and familiarity of contexts. International Journal of Science Education, 41(9), 1159-1180. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1596329 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1596329
  • Khishfe, R. (2017). Consistency of nature of science views across scientific and socio-scientific contexts. International Journal of Science Education, 39(4), 403-432. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1287976 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1287976
  • Lederman, N. G., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Schwartz, R. S. (2002). Views of nature of science questionnaire: Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners’ conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,39, 497–521. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10034 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10034
  • Lederman, N. G., & Lederman, J. S. (2019). Teaching and learning nature of scientific knowledge: Is it Déjà vu all over again?. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 1, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-019-0002-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-019-0002-0
  • Lederman, N. G., Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Smith, M. U. (2019). Teaching nature of scientific knowledge to kindergarten through university students. Science & Education, 28(3–5), 197–203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-019-00057-x . DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-019-00057-x
  • Lederman, N. G., Antink, A., & Bartos, S. (2014). Nature of science, scientific inquiry, and socio-scientific issues arising from genetics: A pathway to developing a scientifically literate citizenry. Science & Education, 23, 285-302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-012-9503-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-012-9503-3
  • McComas, W. F. (2020). Principal elements of nature of science: informing science teaching while dispelling the myths. In W. F. McComas (Ed.), Nature of science in science instruction: Rationales and strategies (pp. 3–22). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57239-6_3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57239-6_3
  • McComas, W. F. & Clough, M. P. (2020). Nature of science in science instruction: Meaning, advocacy, rationales, and recommendations. In W. F. McComas (Ed.), Nature of science in science instruction: Rationales and strategies (pp. 3–22). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57239-6_1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57239-6_1
  • Mesci, G., & Schwartz, R. S. (2017). Changing preservice science teachers’ views of nature of science: Why some conceptions may be more easily altered than others. Research in Science Education, 47, 329-351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-015-9503-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-015-9503-9
  • Mesci, G. (2020). Difficult topics in the nature of science: An alternative explicit/reflective program for pre-service science teachers. Issues in Educational Research, 30(4), 1355-1374. https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/informit.606242371483247
  • Mesci, G., Yeşildağ-Hasançebi, F., & Tuncay-Yüksel, B. (2023). Argumentation based nature of science instruction: Influence on pre-service science teachers’ NOS views and practicing. Teaching and Teacher Education, 132, 104231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104231 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104231
  • Mulvey, B. K. & Bell, R. L. (2017). Making learning last: teachers’ long-term retention of improved nature of science conceptions and instructional rationales. International Journal of Science Education, 39(1), 62–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1267879 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1267879
  • National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and Core ideas. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/13165 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17226/13165
  • Nouri, N. & McComas, W. F. (2019). History of science (HOS) as a vehicle to communicate aspects of nature of science (NOS): multiple cases of HOS instructors’ perspectives regarding NOS. Research in Science Education, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-019-09879-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-019-09879-9
  • Nouri, N., Saberi, M., McComas, W. F., & Mohammadi, M. (2021) Proposed Teacher Competencies to Support Effective Nature of Science Instruction: A Meta-Synthesis of the Literature. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 32(6), 601-624, https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2020.1871206 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2020.1871206
  • Sweeney, S. J., & McComas, W. F. (2022). Early elementary (K-4) teachers’ perceptions of the developmental appropriateness, importance, and potential for classroom inclusion of key nature of science aspects. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 59(9), 1544-1574. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21766 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21766
  • Tang, K. S. (2016). Constructing scientific explanations through premise–reasoning– outcome (PRO): an exploratory study to scaffold students in structuring written explanations. International Journal of Science Education, 38(9), 1415–1440. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1192309 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1192309
  • Vygotsky, L. S., & Cole, M. (1978). Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes. Harvard university press.
  • Voss, S., Kruse, J., & Kent-Schneider, I. (2022). Comparing student responses to convergent, divergent, and evaluative nature of science questions. Research in Science Education, 52(4), 1277-1291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-021-10009-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-021-10009-7
  • Wahbeh, N., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2014). Revisiting the translation of nature of science understandings into instructional practice: Teachers’ nature of science pedagogical content knowledge. International Journal of Science Education, 36(3), 425–466. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2013.786852 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2013.786852
  • Wheeler, L. B., Mulvey, B. K., Maeng, J. L., Librea-Carden, M. R., & Bell, R. L. (2019). Teaching the teacher: Exploring STEM graduate students’ nature of science conceptions in a teaching methods course. International Journal of Science Education, 41(14), 1905-1925. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1647473 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1647473
  • Yacoubian, H. A. (2021). Students’ views of nature of science. Science & Education, 30(2), 381-408. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-020-00179-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-020-00179-7
Еще
Статья научная