Social media use and online prosocial behaviour among high school students: the role of moral identity, empathy, and social self-efficacy

Social media use and online prosocial behaviour among high school students: the role of moral identity, empathy, and social self-efficacy

Автор: Shodiq S.F., Syamsudin S., Dahliyana A., Kurniawaty I., Faiz A.

Журнал: Интеграция образования @edumag-mrsu

Рубрика: Образование и культура

Статья в выпуске: 3 (116), 2024 года.

Бесплатный доступ

Introduction. The digital landscape is becoming increasingly important in shaping adolescents’ social interactions. Most researchers examine the negative effects of social media, but there are virtually no publications on the positive effects of social networks on the formation of prosocial behaviour in the digital space. The purpose of this study is to analyze the influence of social networks, moral identity, empathy, and social self-efficacy on the formation of prosocial behaviour in students on the Internet. Methods and Materials. A total of 430 students participated in the study in public high schools in Yogyakarta, Indonesia. The data obtained were analyzed using the software tool Smart-PLS, which is used for structural equation modeling analysis, related to the constructs of revisit intention and suggestion intention. Two types of analyses, external and internal models, were applied in this paper.

Еще

Online prosocial, social media use, moral identity, empathy, social self-efficacy

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/147244448

IDR: 147244448   |   DOI: 10.15507/1991-9468.116.028.202403.454-468

Список литературы Social media use and online prosocial behaviour among high school students: the role of moral identity, empathy, and social self-efficacy

  • Mahfud T., Mulyani Y., Setyawati R., Kholifah N. The Influence of Teaching Quality, Social Support, and Career Self-Efficacy on the Career Adaptability Skills: Evidence from a Polytechnic in Indonesia. Integration of Education. 2022;26(1):27-41. http://dx.doi.org/10.15507/1991-9468.106.026.202201.027-041
  • Uhls Y.T., Ellison N.B., Subrahmanyam K. Benefits and Costs of Social Media in Adolescence. Pediatrics. 2017;140(Supplement_2):67-70. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2016-1758E
  • Abarna S., Sheeba J.I., Jayasrilakshmi S., Devaneyan S.P. Identification of Cyber Harassment and Intention of Target Users on Social Media Platforms. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence. 2022;115:105283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2022.105283
  • Mahfud T., Siswanto I., Wijayanto D.S., Puspitasari P.F. Antecedent Factors of Vocational High School Students' Readiness for Selecting Careers: A Case in Indonesia. Cakrawala Pendidikan. 2020;39(3):633-644. Available at: https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/cp/article/view/32310 (accessed 05.02.2024).
  • Tao S., Lan M., Tan C.Y., Liang Q., Pan Q., Law N.W.Y. Adolescents' Cyberbullying Experience and Subjective Well-Being: Sex Difference in the Moderating Role of Cognitive-Emotional Regulation Strategy. Computers in Human Behavior. 2024;153:108122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.108122
  • Erreygers S., Vandebosch H., Vranjes I., Baillien E., De Witte H. Development of a Measure of Adolescents' Online Prosocial Behavior. Journal of Children and Media. 2018;12(4):448-464. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 17482798.2018.1431558
  • Jang Y. J., Kim H.W., Jung Y. A Mixed Methods Approach to the Posting of Benevolent Comments Online. International Journal of Information Management. 2016;36(3):414-424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfo-mgt.2016.02.001
  • Valkenburg P.M., Peter J. Online Communication among Adolescents: An Integrated Model of Its Attraction, Opportunities, and Risks. Journal of Adolescent Health. 2011;48(2):121—127. https://doi.org/10.1016/). jadohealth.2010.08.020
  • Leng J., Guo Q., Ma B., Zhang S., Sun P. Bridging Personality and Online Prosocial Behavior: The Roles of Empathy, Moral Identity, and Social Self-Efficacy. Frontiers in Psychology. 2020;11:575053. https://doi.org/10.3389/ fpsyg.2020.575053
  • Lv Y., Qiao X., Leng J., Zheng Y., Guo Q. Mindfulness Promotes Online Prosocial Behavior via Cognitive Empathy. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021;18(13):7017. https:// doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18137017
  • Erreygers S., Vandebosch H., Vranjes I., Baillien E., De Witte H. Nice or Naughty? The Role of Emotions and Digital Media Use in Explaining Adolescents' Online Prosocial and Antisocial Behavior. Media Psychology. 2017;20(3):374-400. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2016.1200990
  • Lysenst0en C., B0e T., Hjetland G.J., Skogen J.C. A Review of the Relationship between Social Media Use and Online Prosocial Behavior among Adolescents. Frontiers in Psychology. 2021;12:579347. https://doi. org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.579347
  • Prot S., Gentile D.A., Anderson C.A., Suzuki K., Swing E., Lim K.M., et al. Long-Term Relations among Prosocial-Media Use, Empathy, and Prosocial Behavior. Psychological Science. 2013;25(2):358-368. https://doi. org/10.1177/0956797613503854
  • Zeng P., Zhao X., Xie X., Long J., Jiang Q., Wang Y., et al. Moral Perfectionism and Online Prosocial Behavior: The Mediating Role of Moral Identity and the Moderating Role of Online Interpersonal Trust. Personality and Individual Differences. 2020;162:110017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110017
  • De Caroli M.E., Sagone E. Self-Efficacy and Prosocial Tendencies in Italian Adolescents. Procedia -Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2013;92:239-245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.08.666
  • Hardy S.A., Bean D.S., Olsen J.A. Moral Identity and Adolescent Prosocial and Antisocial Behaviors: Interactions with Moral Disengagement and Self-Regulation. Journal of Youth and Adolescence. 2015;44:1542-1554. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-014-0172-1
  • Valkenburg P.M., Peter J. Social Consequences of the Internet for Adolescents: A Decade of Research. Current Directions in Psychological Science. 2009;18(1):1-5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01595.x
  • Martínez-Gregorio S., Oliver A. Generalizability of Alignment and Sorting Effects in Secondary Education: Evaluation of the Effectiveness of an Activity for the Entrepreneurial Competence Promotion. Revista de Psicodidáctica (English Ed.). 2023;28(2):173-181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psicoe.2023.05.002
  • Reich S.M., Subrahmanyam K., Espinoza G. Friending, IMing, and Hanging out Face-To-Face: Overlap in Adolescents' Online and Offline Social Networks. Developmental Psychology. 2012;48(2):356-368. https:// doi.org/10.1037/a0026980
  • Alloway T., Runac R., Quershi M., Kemp G. Is Facebook Linked to Selfishness? Investigating the Relationships among Social Media Use, Empathy, and Narcissism. Social Networking. 2014;3(3):150-158. http:// dx.doi.org/10.4236/sn.2014.33020
  • Vossen H.G.M., Valkenburg P.M. Do Social Media Foster or Curtail Adolescents' Empathy? A Longitudinal Study. Computers in Human Behavior. 2016;63:118-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.040
  • Zhao Y., Chu X., Rong K. Cyberbullying Experience and Bystander Behavior in Cyberbullying Incidents: The Serial Mediating Roles of Perceived Incident Severity and Empathy. Computers in Human Behavior. 2023;138:107484. https://doi.org/10.1016/jxhb.2022.107484
  • Hardy S.A., Carlo G. Moral Identity: What Is It, How Does It Develop, and Is It Linked to Moral Action? Child Development Perspectives. 2011;5(3):212-218. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-8606.2011.00189.x
  • Aquino K., Reed A. The Self-Importance of Moral Identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2002;83(6):1423-1440. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.6.1423
  • Winterich K.P., Mittal V., Ross Jr. W.T. Donation Behavior toward In-Groups and Out-Groups: The Role of Gender and Moral Identity. Journal of Consumer Research. 2009;36(2):199-214. https://doi.org/10.1086/596720
  • Hertz S.G., Krettenauer T. Does Moral Identity Effectively Predict Moral Behavior? A Meta-Analysis. Review of General Psychology. 2016;20(2):129-140. https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000062
  • Batson C.D., Lishner D.A., Stocks E. The Empathy-Altruism Hypothesis. In: Schroeder D.A., Graziano W.G. (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Prosocial Behavior. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2015. Р. 259-281. https://doi.org/10.1093/OXFORDHB%2F9780195399813.013.023
  • Flook L., Goldberg S.B., Pinger L., Davidson R.J. Promoting Prosocial Behavior and Self-Regulatory Skills in Preschool Children through a Mindfulness-Based Kindness Curriculum. Developmental Psychology. 2015;51(1):44-51. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038256
  • Eisenberg N. Emotion, Regulation, and Moral Development. Annual Review of Psychology. 2000; 51:665-697. https://doi.org/10.n46/annurev.psych.51.L665
  • Davis M.H. Measuring Individual Differences in Empathy: Evidence for a Multidimensional Approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1983;44(1):113-126. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.44.U13
  • Wodzicki K., Schwämmlein E., Cress U., Kimmerle J. Does the Type of Anonymity Matter? The Impact of Visualization on Information Sharing in Online Groups. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking. 2011;14(3):157-160. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2009.0383
  • Ivcevic Z., Ambady N. Face to (Face)Book: The Two Faces of Social Behavior? Journal of Personality. 2013;81(3):290-301. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2012.00804.x
  • Gecas V. The Social Psychology of Self-Efficacy. Annual Review of Sociology. 1989;15:291-316. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2083228 (accessed 05.02.2024).
  • Valkenburg P.M., Peter J. Adolescents' Identity Experiments on the Internet: Consequences for Social Competence and Self-Concept Unity. Communication Research. 2008;35(2):208-231. https://doi. org/10.1177/0093650207313164
  • Falanga R., De Caroli M.E., Sagone E. Humor Styles, Self-Efficacy and Prosocial Tendencies in Middle Adolescents. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2014;127:214-218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sb-spro.2014.03.243
  • Patrick R.B., Bodine A.J., Gibbs J.C., Basinger K.S. WhatAccounts for Prosocial Behavior? Roles ofMoral Identity, Moral Judgment, and Self-Efficacy Beliefs. The Journal of Genetic Psychology. 2018;179(5):231-245. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221325.2018.1491472
  • Steinemann S.T., Geelan B.J., Zaehringer S., Mutuura K., Wolkow E., Frasseck L., et al. Potentials and Pitfalls of Increasing Prosocial Behavior and Self-Efficacy Over Time Using an Online Personalized Platform. Plos One. 2020;15(6):e0234422. Available at: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal. pone.0234422 (accessed 05.02.2024).
  • Ellison N.B., Steinfield C., Lampe C. The Benefits of Facebook "Friends:" Social Capital and College Students' Use of Online Social Network Sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 2007;12(4):1143-1168. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00367.x
  • Brett J.D., Becerra R., Maybery M.T., Preece D.A. The Psychometric Assessment of Empathy: Development and Validation of the Perth Empathy Scale. Assessment. 2022;30(4):1140-1156. https://doi. org/10.1177/10731911221086987
  • Muris P.A Brief Questionnaire for Measuring Self-Efficacy in Youths. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment. 2001;23:145-149. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010961119608
  • Zysberg L., Hy L. Emotional Education: A Selective Literature Review and an Emerging Model. Multi Colors: An International Journal of Educational Research and Theory. 2019;1(1):37-50. Available at: https:// www.researchgate.net/publication/330224476_Emotional_Education_A_Selective_Literature_Review_and_an_ Emerging_Model (accessed 05.02.2024).
Еще
Статья научная
QR-код для установки приложения SciUp Наведите камеру и скачайте бесплатное приложение SciUp