Сравнительный анализ состояния развития технологических платформ в Европейском союзе и Российской Федерации

Сравнительный анализ состояния развития технологических платформ в Европейском союзе и Российской Федерации

Автор: Волкова Ирина Олеговна, Бурда Егор Дмитриевич

Журнал: Вестник Южно-Уральского государственного университета. Серия: Экономика и менеджмент @vestnik-susu-em

Рубрика: Управление социально-экономическими системами

Статья в выпуске: 4 т.10, 2016 года.

Бесплатный доступ

В статье рассматривается такой инструмент государственной инновационной политики, как технологические платформы, выполняющие роль связующего элемента между частным, государственным и научным секторами экономики. На основании анализа исследовательского поля в сфере межфирменных взаимодействий было теоретически доказано, что технологические платформы представляют собой продукт длительного эволюционного развития форм кооперации экономических агентов. Одновременно была рассмотрена сущность феномена технологических платформ как механизма реализации государственной инновационной политики на примере Европейского Союза, опыт которого лег в основу выстраивания подобных формирований в Российской Федерации. Затем был проведен сопоставительный анализ технологических платформ ЕС и России, позволивший выявить основные методологические различия в подходах к их реализации. Особое внимание уделено существующим в настоящий момент трудностям функционирования технологических платформ в России, которые были классифицированы на основании результатов проведенного сравнительного анализа. Наряду с этим, были предложены наиболее перспективные направления приложения усилий с целью повышения успешности реализации данного механизма государственной политики.

Еще

Технологические платформы, межфирменные взаимодействия, инновационная политика, исследования и разработки, инструменты, государственно-частное партнерство

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/147156310

IDR: 147156310   |   DOI: 10.14529/em160411

Список литературы Сравнительный анализ состояния развития технологических платформ в Европейском союзе и Российской Федерации

  • Stiehm, Judith Hicks and Nicholas W. Townsend (2002). The U.S. Army War College: Military Education in a Democracy. Temple University Press. p. 6. ISBN 1-56639-960-2.
  • Werner S. Recent developments in international management research: A review of 20 top management journals. Journal of Management, 28(3). 2002. PP. 277-305.
  • Kim S., Matthyssens P., Martens R., Streukens S. Building capabilities to manage strategic alliances. Industrial Marketing Management, 40(6). 2011. PP. 875-886.
  • Gulati R. Alliances and networks. Strategic Management Journal, 19(4). 1998. PP. 293-317.
  • Hamel G., Doz Y., Prahalad C. Collaborate with your competitors -and win. Harvard Business Review, 67(1). 1989. PP. 133-139.
  • Wassmer U. Alliance portfolios: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 36(1). 2010. PP. 141-171.
  • Draulans J., de Man A., Volberda H. Building alliance capability: management techniques for superior alliance performance. Long Range Planning, 36(2). 2003. PP. 151-166.
  • Nohria N., Garcia-Pont C. Global strategic linkages and industry structure. Strategic Management Journal, 12(1). 1991. PP. 105-124.
  • Ford D. Guest editorial: The IMP Group and international marketing. International Marketing Review, 21(2). 2004. PP. 139-141. 10.1108/02651330410531358
  • Johnston W., Peters L., Gassenheimer J. Questions about network dynamics: Characteristics, structures, and interactions. Journal of Business Research, 59(8). 2006. PP. 945-954.
  • Ford D., Redwood M. Making sense of network dynamics through network pictures: A longitudinal case study. Industrial Marketing Management, 34(7). 2005. PP. 648-657.
  • Salmi A., Anderson H., Andersson P., Havila V. Business network dynamics and M&As. 16th IMP-conference, Bath, U.K. 2000.
  • Harrison D., Holmen E., Pedersen A. How companies strategize deliberately in networks using strategic initiatives. Industrial Marketing Management, 39(6). 2010. PP. 947-955 DOI: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2010.06.014
  • Järvensivu T., Möller K. Metatheory of network management: A contingency perspective. Industrial Marketing Management, 38(6). 2009. PP. 654-661 DOI: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2009.04.005
  • Möller K., Halinen A. Business relationships and networks: Managerial challenge of network era. Industrial Marketing Management, 28(5). 1999. PP. 413-427.
  • Möller K., Svahn S. Managing strategic nets: A capability perspective. Marketing Theory, 3(2). 2003. PP. 201-226.
  • Ritter T., Wilkinson I., Johnston W. Measuring network competence: Some international evidence. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 17(2). 2002. PP. 119-138.
  • Ritter T., Wilkinson I., Johnston, W. Managing in complex business networks. Industrial Marketing Management, 33(3). 2004. PP. 175-183 DOI: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2003.10.016
  • Mouzas S., Henneberg S., Naudé P. Trust and reliance in business relationships. European Journal of Marketing, 41(9). 2007. PP. 1016-1032 DOI: 10.1108/03090560710773327
  • Mouzas S., Henneberg S., Naudé P. Developing network insight. Industrial Marketing Management, 37(2). 2008. PP. 167-180 DOI: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2007.01.003
  • Öberg C., Henneberg S., Mouzas S. Changing network pictures: Evidence from mergers and acquisitions. Industrial Marketing Management, 36(7). 2007. PP. 926-940 DOI: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2007.05.010
  • Harrigan K. Joint Ventures and Competitive Strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 9(2). 1988 PP. 141-158.
  • Mjoen H, Tallman S. Control and performance in international joint ventures. Organization Science, 8(3). 1997. PP. 257-274.
  • Killing J. Strategies for Joint Ventures. Preager, New York. 1983.
  • Stuckley A. Vertical Integration and Joint Ventures in the Aluminum Industry. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. 1983.
  • Beamish P. The characteristics of joint ventures in developed and developing countries. Columbia J. World Bus, 20(3). 1985. PP. 13-19.
  • Buckley P., Mucchielli J. Multinational Firms and International Relocation. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK. 1997. PP. 220-237.
  • Franco L. Joint venture divorce in the multinational company. Columbia J. World Bus, 6(3). 1971. PP. 13-22.
  • Gomes-Casseres B. Joint venture instability: Is it a problem? Columbia J. World Bus, 22(2). 1987. PP. 97-102.
  • Hennart J., Kim D., Zeng M. The impact of joint venture status on the longevity of Japanese stakes in US manufacturing affilates. Organizational Science, 9(3). 1998. PP. 382-395.
  • Kent D. Joint ventures vs non-joint ventures. An empirical investigation. Strategic Management Journal, 12(5). 1991. PP. 387-393.
  • Li J. Foreign entry and survival: Effects of strategic choices on performance in international markets. Strategic Management Journal, 16(5). 1995. PP. 333-351.
  • Park S., Russo M. When competition eclipses cooperation: An event history analysis of joint venture failure. Management Science, 42(6). 1996. PP. 875-890.
  • Park S., Ungson G. The effect of national culture, organizational complementarity and economic motivation on joint venture dissolution. Academy of Management Journal, 40(2). 1997. PP. 270-307.
  • Pennings J, Barkema H., Douma S. Organization learning and diversification. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3). 1994. PP. 608-640.
  • Holan P., Phillips N. Remembrance of things past? The dynamics of organizational forgetting. Management Science, 50(11). 2004. PP. 1603-1613.
  • Eisenhardt K., Schoonhoven C. Resource-based view of strategic alliance formation: strategic and social effects in entrepreneurial firms. Organization Science, 7(2). 1996. PP. 136-150.
  • Kogut B. Joint Ventures: Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives. Strategic Management Journal, 9(4). 1988. PP. 319-332.
  • Dyer H. Specialized supplier networks as a source of competitive advantage: Evidence from auto industry. Strategic management journal, 17(4). 1996. PP. 271-291.
  • Anderson J., Rungtasanatham M., Schroeder R. A theory of quality management underlying the Deming Management Method. Academy of Management Review, 19(3). 1994. PP. 472-509.
  • Juran J. Juran on Leadershipfor Quality. Free Press, New York. 1989.
  • Dean J., Bowen J. Management theory and total quality: Improving research and practice through theory development. Academy of Management Review, 19(3). 1994. PP. 392-418.
  • Dunne T., Roberts M., Samuelson L. Patterns of Firm Entry and Exit in U.S. Manufacturing Industries. The RAND Journal of Economics, 19. 1988. PP. 495-515.
  • Richardson G. The organization of industry. Economic Journal, 82(387). 1972. PP. 883-896.
  • Harrison B. Industrial Districts: Old Wine in New Bottles? Regional Studies, 26(5). 1992. PP. 4694-83.
  • Huber G. Organizational Learning: The Contributing Processes and the Literature. Organization Science, 2(1). 1991. PP. 76-92.
  • Powell W., Kopu K. W., Smith-Doerr L. Inter-organizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(1). 1996. PP. 116-145.
  • Mitchell W., Singh K. Survival of businesses using collaborative relationships to commercialize complex goods. Strategic Management Journal, 17(3). 1996. PP. 169-195.
  • Larson A. Network Dyads in Entrepreneurial Settings: A Study of the Governance of Exchange Relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37(1). 1992. PP. 96-104.
  • Baum J. Calabrese T., Silverman B. Don't go it alone: Alliance network composition and startups' performance in Canadian biotechnology. Strategic Management Journal, 21(3). 2000. PP. 267-294.
  • Burt R. Structural Holes and Good Ideas. The American Journal of Sociology, 110(2). 2004. PP. 349-399.
  • Hargadon B. Brokering Knowledge: Linking Learning and Innovation. Research and Organizational Behavior, 24. 2002. PP. 41-85.
  • Podolny M. Market uncertainty and the social character of economic exchange. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(3). 1994. PP. 458-483.
  • Gulati R. Social structure and alliance formation patterns: A longitudinal analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(4). 1995. PP. 619-652.
  • Powell W., Kopu K. W., Smith-Doerr L. Inter-organizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(1). 1996 PP. 116-145.
  • Mahnke V., Pedersen T., Venzin M. The Impact of Knowledge Management on MNC Subsidiary Performance: The Role of Absorptive Capacity. Management International Review, 45(2). 2005. PP. 101-119.
  • Kogut B. Joint Ventures: Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives. Strategic Management Journal, 9(4). 1988. PP. 319-332.
  • Giovanni D. Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: A suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change. Research Policy, 11(3). 1982. PP. 147-162.
  • Gawer A. Platforms, Markets and Innovation. Edward Edgar Publishing, Nothampton. 2009.
  • Hamel G. Competition for competence and inter-partner learning within international strategic alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 12(1). 1991. PP. 83-104.
  • Cohen M., Levinthal D. Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1). 1990. PP. 1128-1152.
  • Shan W., Walker G., Kogut B. Interfirm cooperation and startup innovation in the biotechnology industry. Strategic Management Journal, 15(5). 1994. PP. 387-394.
  • Pil F.& MacDuffie J.P. The adoption of high involvement work practices. Industrial Relations. 1996.
  • Powell W., Grodal. S. Networks of Innovators. The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2005.
  • Dezhina I. Technology platforms in Russia: a catalyst for connecting government, science, and business? Triple Helix, 1(6). 2014.
  • Luksha O. European technology platforms: possibilities to use foreign experience for creation of new instrument to support innovative development of Russian economy. Innovations, 9. 2010. PP. 34-41.
  • Proskuryakova L., Meissner D., Rudnik P. The use of technology platforms as a policy tool to address research challenges and technology transfer. Journal of Technology Transfer. Springer Science + Business Media. New York. 2014.
  • Shelyubskaya N. Technology platforms -mechanism for development of branch strategy and cooperation (EU experience). Russia: tendencies and prospects for development. Yearbook, 1. INION RAS, Moscow. 2011. PP. 733-739.
  • Shelyubskaya N. European technology platforms -from development of branch research priorities to clusters. Innovations, 9. 2012. PP. 51-57.
  • Economides N., Katsamakas E. Two-Sided Competition of Proprietary vs. Open Source Technology Platforms and the Implications for the Software Industry. Management Science, 52(7). 2006. PP. 1057-1071.
  • Lichtman D. Property Rights in Emerging Platform Technologies. The Journal of Legal Studies, 29(2). 2000. PP. 615-648.
  • European Commission (2010a). Strengthening the role of European Technology Platforms in addressing Europe’s Grand Societal Challenges Report of the ETP Expert Group, October 2009, Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2010.
  • A European strategy for Organic and Large Area Electronics (OLAE). Vision paper. June 2013.
  • European Commission (2005) Report on European Technology Platforms and Joint Technology Initiatives: Fostering Public-Private НИОКР Partnerships to Boost Europe’s Industrial Competitiveness. Brussels.
  • Science, Technology and Innovation in Russia.: brief data book/. -Moscow: ISS RAS, 2007-2014/L. Mindeli, I. Zinovyeva, O. Solomentseva et al. -2015 -108 p.
  • Science, Technology and Innovation in Russia: brief data book/. -Moscow: ISS RAS, 2007-2013/L. Mindeli, I. Zinovyeva, O. Solomentseva et al. -2014. -90 p.
  • OECD Science (2010) Technology and industry outlook. OECD, Paris.
  • OECD Science (2012) Technology and industry outlook. OECD, Paris.
  • Интернет-портал «Инновации в России», раздел «Технологические платформы». -http://innovation.gov.ru/ru/taxonomy/term/2331 (дата обращения: 04.09.2016, 10:07).
  • Рудник П. Технологические платформы в практике российской инновационной политики//ФорсАйт, 2011. 5(1). С. 16-25.
Еще
Статья научная
QR-код для установки приложения SciUp Наведите камеру и скачайте бесплатное приложение SciUp