The Affective Turn in Metamodernist Fiction and “New Sincerity”

Бесплатный доступ

The aim of the article is to analyze pragmatic strategies and mechanisms to enhance narrative empathy, the key notion of metamodernist fiction that distinguishes it from postmodernist and modernist literary texts. The article postulates foregrounding of emotivity markers in metamodernist texts as a linguistic manifestation of the cultural logic of "new sincerity" in the contemporary fiction that is characterized by the lack of an explicit ludic modality of postmodernist fiction and by stressing means of producing emotional resonance on the part of the reader and their active perspective-taking. The article makes an original contribution to cognitive stylistics, multimodal studies and narratology by hypothesizing polyphony of narrative "voices", second-person narrative and visual foregrounding as effective pragmalinguistic tools of triggering emotive and cognitive empathy that increases reader's immersion in metamodernist fictional worlds. Using the novels by M. Porter and J. Egan, the short stories by J.S. Foer and D. Eggers as its case studies, the article proves the relevance of viewing the "new sincerity" concept as a driving force behind the authorial empathy towards fictional characters, which enhances emotionogenic potential of metamodernist fiction and contributes to reader's engagement with modeled emotive situations. The findings of the research testify to the importance of further research into "new sincerity" and potential mechanisms of inducing reader's empathy which is justly considered a powerful instrument for promoting social interaction, helping readers of all ages to inhibit aggression and develop understanding of others' motives, emotions and desires.

Еще

Metamodernist fiction, narrative empathy, emotionogenic potential, new sincerity, emotional resonance, perspective-taking, visual foregrounding

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/149145971

IDR: 149145971   |   DOI: 10.15688/jvolsu2.2024.2.7

Список литературы The Affective Turn in Metamodernist Fiction and “New Sincerity”

  • Almalech M., 2014. Semiotics of Colour. New Semiotics Between Tradition and Innovation. Proceedings of the 12th World Congress of the International Association for Semiotic Studies (IASS/AIS) Sofia 2014, 16–20 September. Sofia, New Bulgarian University, pp. 747-758.
  • Chemodurova Z.M., 2017. Pragmatika i semantika igry v angloyazichnoy postmodernistskoy proze XX–XXI vekov: avtoref. dis. ... d-ra filol. Nauk [Pragmatics and Semantics of Play in the 20th – 21st Сent. English-Language Proze. Dr. philol. sci. abs. diss]. Saint Petersburg. 40 p.
  • Chemodurova Z., 2019. The Mechanisms and Types of Foregrounding in Postmodernist Fiction. Haase Ch., Orlova N., eds. English Language Teaching: Through the Lens of Experience. Newcastle, Cambridge Scholars Publ., pp. 277-295.
  • Chemodurova Z.M., 2021. Visual Foregrounding in Contemporary Fiction. Voprosy kognitivnoy lingvistiki [Issues of Cognitive Linguistics], no. 5, pp. 5-15. DOI: 10.20916/1812-3228-2021-2-5-15
  • Chemodurova Z.M., 2022. The Art of Storytelling in the Digital Age: A Multimodal Perspective. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 2. Yazykoznanie [Science Journal of Volgograd State University. Linguistics], vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 110-120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15688/jvolsu2.2022.6.9
  • Chew E., Mitchell A., 2016. How Is Empathy Evoked in Multimodal Life Stories? Concentric. Literary and Cultural Studies, Sept., pp. 125-149. DOI: 10.6240/concentric.lit.2016.42.2.08
  • Crown S., 2015. Max Porter: The Experience of the Boys in the Novel Is Based on My Dad Dying When I Was Six. The Guardian, Sept. 12.
  • Decety J., Meyer M., 2008. From Emotion Resonance to Empathic Understanding: A Social Developmental Neuroscience Account. Development and Psychopathology, iss. 20, pp. 1053-1080.
  • Eco U., 1984. The Postscript to the Name of the Rose. A Helen and Kurt Wolff Book. San Diego, New York, London, Harcourt Brace Yovanovich. 84 p.
  • Epstein M., 1992. O novoy sentimentalnosti [On the New Sentimentality]. URL: https://www.emory.edu/INTELNET/es_new_sentimentality.html
  • Filimonova O.E., 2001. Yazyk emotsii v angliyskom tekste (kognitivnyy i kommunikativnyy aspekti) [The Language of Emotions in the English Text (Cognitive and Communicative Aspects)]. Saint Petersburg, Herzen State Pedagogical University Publ. 259 p.
  • Gibbons A., Vermeulen T., van den Akker R., 2019. Reality Beckons: Metamodernist Depthiness Beyond Panfictionality. European Journal of English Studies, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 172-189. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13825577.2019.1640426
  • Heinz D., 1995. Ted Hughes, The Art of Poetry, No. 71. The Paris Review, iss. 134, Spring. URL: https://theparisreview.org/interviews/1669/the-art-ofpoetry-no-71-ted-hughes
  • Hoffmann L., 2016. Postirony: The Nonfictional Literature of David Foster Wallace and Dave Eggers. London, Gazelle Book Services Ltd. 210 p.
  • Hutcheon L., 2002. The Politics of Postmodernism. London, New York, Routledge. 232 p.
  • Keen S., 2006. A Theory of Narrative Empathy. Narrative, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 207-236.
  • Keen S., 2007. Empathy and the Novel. Oxford, Oxford Univ. Press. 275 p.
  • Keen S., 2013. Narrative Empathy. The Living Handbook of Narratology. URL: http://lhn.sub.unihamburg.de/index.php/Narrative_Empathy. html
  • Kelly A., 2014. “Dialectic of Sincerity: Lionel Trilling and David Foster Wallace.” Post45. Peer Reviewed. URL: http://post45.research.yale.edu/2014/10/dialectic-ofsincerity-lionel-trillingand-david-foster-wallace
  • Koopman E.M., 2016. Effects of “Literariness” on Emotions and on Empathy and Reflection After Reading. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 82-98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000041
  • Lindhé A., 2016. The Paradox of Narrative Empathy and the Form of the Novel, or What George Eliot Knew. Studies in the Novel, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 19-42.
  • McHale B., 1992. Constructing Postmodernism. London, New York, Routledge. 342 p.
  • Miall D.S., Kuiken D., 2002. A Feeling for Fiction: Becoming What We Behold. Poetics, vol. 30, pp. 221-241.
  • Neary C., 2010. Negotiating Narrative Empathy in Gahndis Life-Writing. The Language of Landscapes. PALA. Conference Proceedings. Genoa, Univ. of Genoa, pp. 2-25.
  • Norgaard N., 2014. Multimodaly and Stylistics. Burke M., ed. The Routledge Handbook of Stylistics. London, New York, Routledge, pp. 471-485.
  • Pignagnoli V., 2016. Sincerity, Sharing, and Authorial Discourses on the Fiction / Nonfiction Distinction: The Case of Dave Eggerss You Shall Know Our Velocity. The Poetics of Genre in the Contemporary Novel, no. 1, pp. 97-111.
  • Ryan M.-L., 2019. “Truth of Fiction Versus Truth in Fiction”. Between, vol. 9, no. 18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13125/2039-6597/3843
  • Schmetkamp S., Vendrell Ferran Í., 2020. Introduction: Empathy, Fiction, and Imagination. Topoi, vol. 39, pp. 743-749. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-019-09664-3
  • Vermeulen T., van den Akker R., 2010. Notes on Metamodernism. Journal of Aesthetics & Culture, vol. 2, no. 1. DOI: 10.3402/jac.v2i0.5677
  • Walton K., 1990. Mimesis as Make-Believe: On the Foundations of the Representational Arts. Cambridge, Harvard University Press. 450 p.
Еще
Статья научная