Values in foundation of modern globalizing society: Change study

Автор: Madina S. Ashilova, Alibek S. Begalinov, Yury V. Pushkarev, Kalimash K. Begalinova, Elena A. Pushkareva

Журнал: Science for Education Today @sciforedu

Рубрика: Философия и история для образования

Статья в выпуске: 2 т.13, 2023 года.

Бесплатный доступ

Introduction. The modern era is experiencing a prolonged pandemic, migration issues, conflicts, and other global catastrophes. Many researchers see the cause of these problems in the crisis of traditional values, which is becoming increasingly apparent today. Values and value orientations are an integral part of human life and culture. They determine life goals, as well as ways and means of achieving them. Global catastrophes and continuous social changes lead to the transformation of the value system, which is reflected in scholarly literature, as researchers primarily react to particularly acute and relevant problems of modern times. The main goal of this study is to reveal values which constitute the foundations of modern globalizing society and to describe their recent transformations. Materials and Methods. In this regard, an analysis of scholarly literature devoted to the issues of values was conducted. The universal classification of values proposed by S. Schwartz was used as the basis for the analysis. The main methodology was content analysis of scholarly literature for the prevalence and occurrence of the main types of values in scientific works in theWeb of Science database from 2017 to 2022. Results. Research findings include the following: 1) the prevalence and use of all types of values has been increasing for the period; 2) the dominance of individualistic egoistic values over public collective values; 3) the most common categories of values are: independence, health, success, responsibility, and capability. The least common values are: open-mindedness, common preferences, self-indulgence, respect for elders, mature love, and true friendship; 4) in recent years despite social upheavals, the main values of society have not changed. Thus, it can be concluded that spiritual values do not generate as much scientific interest as material values. Although the pandemic was able to make people reflect on the moral foundations of their life, it did not significantly affect the re-evaluation of modern values. However, the researchers emphasize that within a decaying culture, some precursors of the emerging (post-technocratic) culture are developing. According to them, the new worldview will be built on overcoming anthropocentric attitudes. Conclusions. This study will complement the understanding of the transformation of modern values under the influence of the pandemic, globalization, crises, and other factors. Its results will be useful to educators in higher education institutions, education philosophers, and anyone interested in higher education problems.

Еще

Philosophy of education, Pandemic, Educational values, Axiology, Educational goals, Educational transformation, Crisis of values

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/147239818

IDR: 147239818   |   DOI: 10.15293/2658-6762.2302.05

Список литературы Values in foundation of modern globalizing society: Change study

  • Gibbs P. Transdisciplinary possibilities after the pandemic. Reimagining the new pedagogical possibilities for universities post-Covid-19. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 2020, vol. 52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2020.1777655
  • O’Dea X., Stern J. Virtually the same?: Online higher education in the post Covid-19 era. British Journal of Educational Technology, 2022, vol. 53 (3), pp. 437–442. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13211 URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjet.13211
  • Phungsoonthorn T., Charoensukmongkol P. How doesmindfulness help university employees cope with emotional exhaustion during the COVID-19 crisis? The mediating role of psychological hardiness and the moderating effect of workload. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 2022, early view. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12826 URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/sjop.12826
  • Tkacová H., Pavlikova M., Jenisová Z., Maturkanič P., Kralik R. Social media and students’ wellbeing: An empirical analysis during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sustainability, 2021, vol. 13 (18), pp. 1–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su131810442
  • Yang L.-P., Xin T. Changing educational assessments in the post-COVID-19 Era: From assessment of learning (AoL) to assessment as learning (AaL). Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2022, vol. 41 (1), pp. 54–60. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/emip.12492 URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/emip.12492
  • Zhang L., Allen Carter R., Qian X., Yang S., Rujimora J., Wen S. Academia's responses to crisis: A bibliometric analysis of literature on online learning in higher education during COVID-19. British Journal of Educational Technology, 2022, vol. 53 (3), pp. 620–646. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13191 URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjet.13191
  • Pushkarev Yu. V., Pushkareva E. A. Philosophical interpretation of knowledge and information: Knowledge value and information diversity in modern communication. XLinguae, 2018, vol. 11 (3), pp. 176–184. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18355/XL.2018.11.03.17
  • Šmajs J. The philosophical conception of a constitution for the Earth. Human Affairs, 2015, vol. 25 (3), pp. 342–361. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/humaff-2015-0028
  • Foster C., Burkhardt H., Schoenfeld A. Crisis-ready educational design: The case of mathematics. The Curriculum Journal, 2022, early view. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/curj.159 URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/curj.159
  • Pushkarev Y. V., Pushkareva E. A. Communication foundation for intellectual culture: Tendencies of contemporary development. XLinguae, 2019, vol. 12 (4), pp. 212–218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18355/XL.2019.12.04.18
  • Baeva L. V. Values of the changing world: Existential axiology of history: amonograph. Astrakhan, 2004. 275 p. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=20066010
  • Meer F. The global crisis - a crisis of values and the domination of the weak by the strong. Journal of Human Values, 1999, vol. 5 (1), pp. 65–74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/097168589900500107
  • Danek J. Philosophical and societal elements of human upbringing. XLinguae, 2019, vol. 12 (4), pp. 66–76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18355/XL.2019.12.04.06 URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=42254245
  • Ashilova M. S., Begalinov A. S., Latuha O. A., Pushkarev Yu. V., Begalinova K. K., Pushkareva E. A. Prospects of the post-digital university: Analysis of program documents in the field of education. Russian Journal of Regional Studies, 2022, vol. 30 (3), pp. 698–720. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15507/2413-1407.120.030.202203.698-720 URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=49467874
  • Begalinova, K. K., AshilovaM. S., Begalinov A. S.Media-educational space as interaction between traditional and media sides of the educational process. Bulletin of the Moscow State Pedagogical University. Series: Philosophical Sciences, 2017, no. 3, pp. 78–83. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=30362072
  • Pushkareva E. A. Value foundations of interaction between modern education and science. Monograph. Novosibirsk, Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Publ., 2014, 172 p. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=24960640
  • Mills B., Wilner A. The science behind “values”: Applying moral foundations theory to strategic foresight. Futures & Foresight Science, 2022, vol. 5 (1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ffo2.145 URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ffo2.145
  • Pushkarev Y. V., Pushkareva E. A. Fundamental knowledge in the continuing education: methodology and axiology of the problem. Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2016, vol. 6 (1), pp. 87–98. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2226-3365.1601.08
  • Pushkarev Y. V., Pushkareva E. A. Continuous education philosophy in the context of global culture development. Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2016, vol. 6 (3), pp. 60–67. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2226-3365.1603.06
  • Pushkareva E. A., Pushkarev Y. V. Philosophy of continuing education: cognitive foundations of personal development in modern conditions. Monograph. Novosibirsk, Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Publ., 2019, 143 p. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=43300997
  • Schwartz S. H. Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 1992, vol. 25, pp. 1– 65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601%2808%2960281-6
  • Qu Yu., Fu P. P., Sun C. Past, Present and Future of Personal Values Research: Inspirations from Literature. Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings, 2019, vol. 2019 (1), pp. 12235. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2019.12235abstract
  • Schwartz S. H., BilskyW. Toward a universal psychological structure of human values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1987, vol. 53, pp. 550–562. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.53.3.550
  • Bardi A., Schwartz S. H. Values and behavior: Strength and structure of relations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2003, vol. 29, pp. 1207–1220. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167203254602
  • Prentice D. A. Psychological correspondence of possessions, attitudes, and values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1987, vol. 53, pp. 993–1003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.53.6.993
  • Berson Y., Oreg S., Dvir T. CEO values, organizational culture and firm outcomes. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2008, vol. 29, pp. 615–633. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/JOB.499
  • Zu L., Song L. Determinants of managerial values on corporate social responsibility: Evidence from China. Journal of Business Ethics, 2009, vol. 88, pp. 105–117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9828-7
  • RohanM. J. A rose by any name? The values construct. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2000, vol. 4, pp. 255–277. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0403_4
  • Hitlin S., Piliavin J. A. Values: Reviving a dormant concept. Annual Review Sociology, 2004, vol. 30, pp. 359–393. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/ANNUREV.SOC.30.012703.110640
  • Kirkman B. L., Lowe K. B., Gibson C. B. A quarter century of culture’s consequences: A review of empirical research incorporating Hofstede’s cultural values framework. Journal of International Business Studies, 2006, vol. 37 (3), pp. 285–320. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400202
  • Roccas S., Sagiv L. Personal values and behavior: Taking the cultural context into account. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2010, vol. 4, pp. 30–41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1751-9004.2009.00234.X
  • Boer D., Fischer R. How and when do personal values guide our attitudes and sociality? Explaining cross-cultural variability in attitude-value linkages. Psychological Bulletin, 2013, vol. 139, pp. 1113–1147. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031347
  • Shabatura L., Yazovskikh A. Actualization of axology development: Problems, searches, solutions. Filosophiya-Philosophy, 2020, vol. 29 (4), pp. 383–390. URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=44332344
  • Pawlowski A. Sustainable Development and Globalization. Problemy Ekorozwoju, 2013, vol. 8 (2), pp. 5–16. URL: https://paperity.org/p/230586292/sustainable-development-and-globalization
  • Voirol O. Solidarity as social reconstruction against “regressive communities”, beyond the neoliberal agenda. Comparative Sociology, 2020, vol. 19 (6), pp. 708–728. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/15691330-12341531
  • Blaj E.-C. On moral ideal between philosophy and religion in the globalizing context. CBU International Conference on Innovations in Science and Education, 2017, vol. 5. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12955/cbup.v5.982
  • Wilson M. COVID-19 and the modern plantation: Debunking the neoliberal moral economy. Cultural Dynamics, 2021, vol. 33 (3), pp. 185–192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/09213740211014310
  • Korobeynikova L. A., Zabulionite K. I. Reinterpretation of values of modern culture. Bulletin of Tomsk State University. Cultural Studies and Art Criticism, 2017, no. 27, pp. 44–56. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17223/22220836/27/5 URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=30672591
  • Aniskina N. V., Ukhova L. V. The axiological world view of a modern advertising consumer. Annales. Series Historia et Sociologia, 2015, vol. 25 (3), pp. 477–484. URL: http://www.dlib.si/?URN=URN:NBN:SI:doc-WX1V8YEN
  • Ivanovskaya, O. V. Identity crisis and sacralization in the globalizing world. Bulletin of Volgograd State University. Series 7: Philosophy. Sociology and Social Technologies, 2011, no. 1, pp. 38–44. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=16862554
  • Witteveen H. J. Economic globalization from a broader long-term perspective: Some questions and concerns. Economist, 1998, vol. 146 (4), pp. 539–554. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003438914834
  • Urmanbetova J. K. Social isolation and loneliness. Professional Education in the Modern World, 2021, vol. 11 (1), pp. 247–253. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.20913/2618-7515-2021-1-24 URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=46264938
  • Daniel E., Bardi A., Fischer R., Benish-Weisman M., Lee J. A. Changes in personal values in pandemic times. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2021, vol. 13 (2), pp. 572–582. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506211024026
  • Ciravegna L., Michailova S.Why the world economy needs, but will not get, more globalization in the post-COVID-19 decade. Journal of International Business Studies, 2022, vol. 53 (1), pp. 172–186. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-021-00467-6
  • Brakman S., Gattersen H., van Witteloostuijn A. Robots do not get the coronavirus: The COVID- 19 pandemic and the international division of labor. Journal of International Business Studies, 2021, vol. 52 (6), pp. 1215–1224. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-021-00410-9
  • Contractor F. J. The world economy will need even more globalization in the post-pandemic 2021 decade. Journal of International Business Studies, 2022, vol. 53 (1), pp. 156–171. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-020-00394-y
  • Thangavel P., Pathak P., Chandra B. Covid-19: Globalization-will the course change? Vision: The Journal of Business Perspective, 2022, vol. 26 (1), pp. 7–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0972262920984571
  • Litonjua M. D. ‘The Socio-Political Construction of Globalization’. International Review of Modern Sociology, 2008, vol. 34 (2), pp. 253–278. URL: https://www.academia.edu/26411940/THE_SOCIO_POLITICAL_CONSTRUCTION_OF_GLOBALIZATION
  • Arandjelovic O. On the Value of Life. The International Journal of Applied Philosophy, 2022, online first. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/ijap2022422169
  • Rahman M., Younus A., Uddin K. Crisis of Morals and Values: A Bangladesh Perspective. International Journal of Social Science Studies, 2018, vol. 6 (11). DOI: https://doi.org/10.11114/ijsss.v6i11.3687
Еще
Статья научная