Age-specific characteristics of creative thinking development in primary school children
Автор: Zhusupova D. Y., Ukueva B. K.
Журнал: Международный журнал гуманитарных и естественных наук @intjournal
Рубрика: Педагогические науки
Статья в выпуске: 7-2 (106), 2025 года.
Бесплатный доступ
This article explores the age-specific characteristics of creative thinking development in primary school learners aged 6 to 10. Drawing on cognitive, emotional, and social developmental psychology, it analyzes internal and external factors that influence creativity, including temperament, motivation, classroom environment, and teaching methods. Particular attention is given to pedagogical strategies that support creative expression, such as open-ended tasks, storytelling, and problem-based learning. The article offers practical recommendations for educators and emphasizes the need for creativity-oriented teacher training and curriculum development. The findings underscore that creativity is not a spontaneous gift, but a developmental skill that can and should be cultivated from an early age.
Creative thinking, primary education, cognitive development, pedagogy, child psychology, imagination, age-specific learning, classroom strategies
Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/170210820
IDR: 170210820 | DOI: 10.24412/2500-1000-2025-7-2-81-85
Текст научной статьи Age-specific characteristics of creative thinking development in primary school children
In an era increasingly defined by rapid innovation and complex problem-solving, the development of creative thinking has become a central objective in education. The ability to think creatively – generating original ideas, approaching problems from multiple perspectives, and imagining alternative solutions – is not only valuable in artistic domains but is equally crucial across academic, social, and future professional contexts. Primary school represents a particularly important stage in this developmental trajectory. It is during these early school years, typically from ages six to ten, that children's cognitive, emotional, and social capacities expand significantly, laying the foundation for lifelong learning. Exploring how creative thinking evolves during this critical period offers valuable insights into both the nature of childhood cognition and the pedagogical conditions necessary for nurturing creative potential.
The theoretical foundation for understanding creative development in children draws from several key psychological frameworks. J.P. Guilford’s concept of divergent thinking, which emphasizes fluency, flexibility, and originality, has long served as a cornerstone in creativity research. Torrance’s work, particularly his Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking (TTCT), further operationalized the measurement of children’s creative potential. Vygotsky, meanwhile, emphasized the socio-cultural roots of imagination and creativity, asserting that guided social interaction and cultural tools – such as language and storytelling – mediate the development of higher mental functions. Similarly, Piaget’s theory of cognitive development suggests that as children move from the preoperational to the concrete operational stages, their symbolic thinking and ability to mentally manipulate information become increasingly sophisticated [1]. These theoretical perspectives converge on the view that creativity is not an innate trait reserved for a gifted few, but rather a dynamic cognitive capacity that can be nurtured through meaningful experiences and interactions.
Children aged 6 to 10 years undergo significant developmental changes that shape their ability to think, communicate, and interact creatively. Cognitively, this age group transitions from the preoperational stage, as described by Piaget, into the concrete operational stage. While younger primary school learners still rely heavily on intuitive and egocentric thinking, older children begin to demonstrate more logical reasoning, perspective-taking, and systematic categorization. Their growing capacity for attention, memory, and symbolic representation plays a crucial role in how they understand and reinterpret information.
Emotionally, children in this age group become more capable of regulating their feelings and recognizing the emotions of others. They begin to develop a clearer sense of self and can express preferences, interests, and individual opinions. These emotional shifts support the development of creative thinking by allowing learners to connect more deeply with imaginative content and articulate original ideas based on personal experiences [2].
Socially, peer relationships become increasingly important, especially after the age of eight. Children seek belonging and recognition within groups, which in turn influences their willingness to share ideas and take creative risks. Collaborative activities such as group storytelling, cooperative games, or class projects provide a social context in which creativity can flourish through interaction and mutual inspiration.
Several traits of children aged 6–10 directly affect their capacity for creative expression. One of the most prominent is flexibility of thought— the ability to consider multiple ideas, perspectives, or solutions. While younger children often display this flexibly through spontaneous play or fantasy narratives, older children begin to apply it more strategically in academic and problemsolving contexts. The development of emotional sensitivity is also critical; children at this stage can empathize with characters, imagine emotional scenarios, and channel feelings into artistic or narrative expression. Emotional richness often translates into more nuanced and expressive creative work.
Additionally, motivation and curiosity are powerful internal drivers of creativity during this age. Young learners are naturally curious and enjoy exploring how things work or imagining how things could be. When supported by an encouraging environment, this curiosity evolves into sustained motivation to engage in creative tasks, whether it be drawing, storytelling, building, or inventing. However, these traits do not develop uniformly across the primary years. Younger learners (ages 6-7) tend to be more impulsive, imaginative, and unfiltered in their expression. They enjoy fantastical themes, pretend play, and sensory experiences, often without concern for structure or realism. Older learners (ages 9-10), by contrast, begin to value coherence, logic, and peer feedback. While they may become more self-critical or hesitant to take creative risks, they are also capable of producing more refined, complex, and intentional creative work [3].
The development of creative thinking in primary school children is influenced by a dynamic interplay of internal and external factors. Internally, cognitive maturity enables children to generate, evaluate, and refine ideas more effectively. As working memory and abstract thinking improve, learners can manipulate concepts, build imaginative scenarios, and anticipate consequences in creative tasks. Temperament also plays a role; some children are naturally more exploratory, adaptable, or emotionally expressive, traits that correlate positively with creativity. Motivation – particularly intrinsic motivation – further enhances creative thinking by sustaining effort and risk-taking, especially when tasks are challenging or open-ended.
Externally, the educational environment is perhaps the most influential factor. Classrooms that foster open-ended exploration, curiosity, and self-expression create fertile ground for creativity. On the contrary, environments focused solely on right answers, rigid outcomes, and time-constrained tasks may suppress originality. Family support is equally vital. Parents who encourage imaginative play, storytelling, and independent thinking at home reinforce a positive attitude toward creativity. The teaching style – including the teacher’s openness, flexibility, and encouragement of diverse ideas – directly affects how comfortable students feel expressing their creative thoughts.
Creative thinking in children thrives particularly well in activities that involve play, art, storytelling, and exploration. Pretend play fosters symbolic thought and narrative construction; visual art allows for sensory experimentation and emotional release; storytelling cultivates imagination, language development, and empathy; exploration promotes inquiry and problem-solving. These modes not only align with children’s natural tendencies but also serve as developmentally appropriate vehicles for creativity across multiple domains [4].
However, numerous barriers to creativity persist in traditional classroom settings. Standardized testing, narrow curriculum objectives, time constraints, and pressure to achieve correct answers often lead teachers to prioritize rote learning over creative exploration. Furthermore, classroom management concerns and large class sizes may discourage risk-taking and experimentation. When learners fear judgment or failure, they be- come less likely to engage in divergent thinking or to express novel ideas, especially those that deviate from the norm.
To foster creativity in primary school, educators must intentionally create pedagogical conditions that support divergent thought, selfexpression, and intellectual flexibility. A variety of methods and techniques have been shown to enhance creative thinking. Brainstorming, for example, encourages learners to generate multiple solutions to a single problem without fear of being wrong. Problem-based learning (PBL) engages students in real-life challenges that require critical and creative solutions. Open-ended tasks – such as designing a new species, inventing a holiday, or retelling a familiar story in a new genre – promote originality and imaginative risktaking.
It is essential that creative activities be integrated across the curriculum, not reserved solely for the arts. In mathematics, for instance, students can invent their own word problems or explore multiple solution paths. In science, they might create imaginative models of ecosystems or propose inventions to address environmental issues. History lessons can incorporate role-play or alternative historical narratives. Such integration reinforces the idea that creativity is a thinking skill relevant to all areas of knowledge, not just artistic endeavors.
The success of these methods depends largely on the attitudes and competencies of teachers. Educators must value creativity as a central learning objective and possess the confidence to facilitate open-ended, sometimes unpredictable classroom experiences. Scaffolding – the intentional support of learners as they engage in new tasks – is crucial. Teachers must know when to guide, when to step back, and how to help students reflect on and refine their creative processes.
Practical examples of classroom practices include using visual prompts to inspire storytelling, engaging learners in design challenges using everyday materials, or initiating “wonder questions” at the start of a lesson to spark curiosity [5]. Teachers might invite students to explore “what if” scenarios, collaborate on building imaginative worlds, or journal from the perspective of a fictional character. Such practices, when implemented consistently and with genuine enthusi- asm, build an inclusive and imaginative learning culture.
When theoretical perspectives and practical observations are synthesized, a coherent picture of age-appropriate creative development begins to emerge. The potential for creative thinking is deeply connected to the developmental stage of the learner. As children grow cognitively and emotionally, the form and function of their creative expressions also evolve. Younger learners tend to be spontaneous and fantastical, expressing creativity through sensory and symbolic play. Older learners, while often more self-aware and structured, can engage in more deliberate, reflective, and socially constructed forms of creativity.
This developmental progression carries important implications for both curriculum design and teacher training. Educators must understand that creative potential is not fixed but developmental – and that different ages require different types of support. Younger children benefit from freedom, encouragement, and playful exploration; older children may need more structured opportunities to build, revise, and share their creative work with others. Recognizing these shifts allows educators to align tasks with learners’ growing cognitive capacities while preserving their intrinsic motivation [6].
Finally, the findings suggest that creativity is not merely an educational “extra” but a vital component of intellectual and emotional growth. Classrooms that prioritize creativity cultivate not only more engaged learners but also more empathetic, adaptable, and innovative individuals. As such, schools should strive to embed creative thinking as a core competency, supported by flexible pedagogy, informed teacher development, and a classroom culture that celebrates curiosity, expression, and imagination.
In conclusion, the development of creative thinking in primary school children is a dynamic, age-sensitive process that intertwines cognitive growth, emotional development, and social interaction. Between the ages of 6 and 10, learners exhibit a unique combination of flexibility, imagination, and increasing self-awareness, making this period especially conducive to fostering creativity. However, the trajectory of creative development is not automatic; it requires intentional pedagogical support, an enabling environment, and age-appropriate strategies.
The analysis reveals that younger primary school learners thrive in contexts that allow for imaginative freedom, sensory exploration, and symbolic play. Their creativity is often spontaneous and emotionally charged, reflecting their emerging understanding of the world. As children grow older, they begin to seek structure, coherence, and social validation, which can either support or inhibit creative expression depending on the classroom environment and instructional approach.
Internal factors such as temperament, motivation, and cognitive maturity play a crucial role in shaping creative potential. However, external influences – including teacher attitudes, family involvement, and school culture – are equally decisive. The presence or absence of supportive pedagogical conditions can either nurture creativity or suppress it in favor of conformity and rote performance.
Based on these insights, the following recommendations are proposed for educators, curriculum designers, and policy-makers:
Differentiate Creative Instruction by Age: Recognize that creative expression manifests differently in younger and older primary school learners. Design tasks that are open-ended for younger children and progressively introduce more structured, reflective creative tasks as learners mature cognitively.
Embed Creativity Across the Curriculum: Avoid relegating creative thinking to the arts alone. Integrate imaginative activities into mathematics, science, language, and social studies. Encourage learners to pose original questions, invent solutions, and interpret information creatively in all subjects.
Adopt Flexible Pedagogical Techniques: Use methods such as brainstorming, problembased learning, storytelling, dramatization, and project-based work. These strategies promote divergent thinking, collaboration, and deep engagement with content.
Foster a Safe and Supportive Classroom Climate: Cultivate an environment where learners feel safe to take risks, make mistakes, and express unconventional ideas. Encourage peer respect and celebrate the uniqueness of each learner’s contributions.
Provide Teacher Training in Creative Pedagogy: Equip educators with the theoretical understanding and practical tools to support creativity. Offer professional development that models creative teaching strategies, classroom management for imaginative activities, and assessment of creative work.
Engage Families in the Creative Process: Encourage parents and caregivers to support creative thinking at home through storytelling, play, open-ended questioning, and exposure to diverse cultural experiences. A home-school partnership reinforces the value of creativity in a child’s development.
Reduce Structural Barriers to Creativity: Reevaluate assessment practices, curriculum constraints, and time pressures that prioritize standardized outcomes over creative exploration. Allow sufficient time and flexibility within the school day for creative projects and inquiry.
Conduct Ongoing Research and Reflection: Schools should monitor the effectiveness of creative teaching practices and adapt them to suit changing learner needs. Longitudinal studies could help track the long-term impact of creative education on academic performance, emotional well-being, and social skills.
Ultimately, cultivating creative thinking in primary school is not just an academic goal – it is a fundamental component of human development. By supporting imagination, curiosity, and original expression from an early age, educators help children build the cognitive and emotional tools they need to navigate an increasingly complex and interconnected world.