Constructing the image of Russia through metaphorical framing

Бесплатный доступ

The paper reveals the key role of metaphor as a discursive pragmatic mechanism for promoting a positive image of Russia and substantiates the effectiveness of metaphorical framing as a method of constructing the country’s image, which is still controversial. The author has demonstrated the explanatory and manipulative effect of metaphorical framing in political and mass media communication. The studypostulates that in framing of political events, the figurative language has both linguistic and conceptual content, and the metaphorical frame is a powerful tool for the formation of beliefs and ideologies. The author points out to the need to expand the metaphorical repertoire applied to construct the image of Russia, and possible ways to activate alternative interpretations of current socio-political events. Possible directions of metaphorical reframing of the country’s image are outlined by fixing complex figurative frames in the minds of target audience and their impact on it. These may consist in rejecting the excessively militarized discourse around the country and focusing on its cultural heritage, academic achievements, willingness of and openness to enhanced international interaction. The paper concludes that the discursive construction of the affirmative Russian image within and outside the country can be achieved through employing a positively charged metaphorical national narrative, reframed to draw particular attention to the merits and gains of Russia.

Еще

Image of Russia, national identity, conceptual metaphor, figurative (re)framing, narrative, speech impact, beliefs, ideology

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/149131938

IDR: 149131938   |   DOI: 10.15688/lp.jvolsu.2021.1.6

Список литературы Constructing the image of Russia through metaphorical framing

  • Boldyrev N.N., 2004. Conceptual Space of Cognitive Linguistcs. Voprosy kognitivnoj lingvistiki, no. 1, pp. 18-36.
  • Budaev E.V., Chudinov A.P., 2006. Metaphor in Political Interdiscourse. Monograph. Yekaterinburg, Ural state pedagogical university.
  • Golubeva T.M., 2016. Metaphor as a Language Means of Creating and Actualizing Public Ideologies. Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N.I. Lobachevskogo, Philology, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 212-216.
  • Lidwell W., Holden K., Butler J., 2003. Universal Principles of Design. Saint Peterburg, Piter Publ. Martynova Yu.A., 2011. Metaphorical Basis ofModern Russian Patriotic Discourse. Izvestiya Saratovskogo universiteta. Novaya seriya. Seriya Sociologiya. Politologiya, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 293-297.
  • Nikitin M.V., 2004. Detailed Theses About Concepts. Voprosy kognitivnoj lingvistiki, no. 1. pp. 53-64.
  • Ponomarev N.F., 2013. Media Framing as a Key Discursive Strategy. Vlast', no. 9, pp. 93-97.
  • Ryabov O.V., Ryabova, T.B., 2016. The Symbol of the Motherland as a Resource for the Formation of Russian Civil Identity. Chelovek. Soobshchestvo. Upravlenie, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 99-114.
  • Sarna A.Ya., 2020. Technologies of Affecting the Audience in the Modern Media Space. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Sociology, vol. 13 (2), pp. 218-235. DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.21638/spbu12.2020.207.
  • Benford R.D., Snow D.A., 2000. Frame Processes and Social Movements: an Overview and Assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, vol. 26, pp. 611-639.
  • Bourmeyster A., 1998. The Restructuring of Soviet Political Discourse. Political Discourse in Transition in Europe 1989-1991. Chilton P., Ilyin M., Mey J. (eds.). Amsterdam, John Benjamin's Publishing Company, pp. 69-87.
  • Boeynaems A., Burgers C. F., Konijn E. A., Steen G. J., 2017. The Effects of Metaphorical Framing on Political Persuasion: A Systematic Literature Review. Metaphor and Symbol, no. 32 (2), pp. 118-134.
  • Borah P., 2011. Conceptual Issues in Framing Theory: A Systematic Examination of a Decade's Literature. Journal of Communication, vol. 61, iss. 2, pp. 246-263.
  • Burgers C.F., Konijn E.A., Steen G. J., 2016. Figurative Framing: Shaping Public Discourse Through Metaphor, Hyperbole, and Irony. Communication Theory, vol. 26, iss. 4, pp. 410-430.
  • Charteris-Black J., 2005. Politicians and Rhetoric. The Persuasive Power of Metaphor. Basingstoke, New York, Palgrave-MacMillan.
  • Charteris-Black J., 2004. Critical Analysis ofMetaphors. Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis. London, Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Charteris-Black J., MusolffA., 2003. 'Battered Hero' or 'Innocent Victim'? A Comparative Study of Metaphors for Euro Trading in British and German Financial Reporting. English for Specific Purposes, no. 22 (2), pp. 153-176. DOI: https:// doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(02)00012-1.
  • Chong D., Druckman J.N., 2007. A Theory ofFraming and Opinion Formation in Competitive Elite Environments. Journal of Communication, no. 1, pp. 99-118.
  • Entman R.M., 1991. Framing U.S. Coverage of International News: Contrasts in Narratives of the KAL and Iran Air Incidents. Journal of Communication, no. 41 (4), pp. 6-27.
  • Feldman J.A., 2008. From Molecule to Metaphor. A Neural Theory of Language. Cambridge, MIT Press.
  • Gamson W.A., Modigliani A., 1989. Media Discourse and Public Opinion on Nuclear Power: A Constructionist Approach. American Journal of Sociology, no. 95 (1), pp. 1-37. DOI: https:// doi.org/10.1086/229213.
  • Gibbs R.W.Jr. (ed.), 2008. The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  • Goffman E., 1974. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Cambridge, Harvard University Press.
  • Hartman T.K., 2012. Toll Booths on the Information Superhighway? Policy Metaphors in the Case of Net Neutrality. Political Communication, no. 29 (3), pp. 278-298. DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.1080/10584609.2012.694983.
  • Iyengar S., 1991. Is Anyone Responsible? How Television Frames Political Issues. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
  • Kitis E., Milapides M., 1997. Read it and Believe it: How Metaphor Constructs Ideology in News Discourse. A Case Study. Journal of Pragmatics, no. 28 (5), pp. 557-590.
  • Koteyko N., Ryazanova-Clarke L., 2009. The Path and Building Metaphors in the Speeches of Vladimir Putin: Back to the Future? Slavonica, vol. 15, p. 112-127.
  • Lakoff G., Johnson M., 1980/2003. Metaphors We Live by. Chicago, The University of Chicago Press.
  • Lecheler S., de Vreese C.H., 2012. News Framing and Public Opinion. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, vol. 89, iss. 2, pp. 185-204.
  • Lee D.A., 2005. The Perfect Nurturer: A Model to Develop a Compassionate Mind Within the Context of Cognitive Therapy. P. Gilbert (ed.). Compassion: Conceptualizations, Research and Use in Psychothrapy. London, Routledge, pp. 326-351.
  • Littlemore J., 2003. The Effect of Cultural Background on Metaphor Interpretation. Metaphor and symbol, no. 18 (4), pp. 273-288.
  • Minsky M., 1974. A Framework for Representing Knowledge. Cambridge.
  • Musolff A., 2004. Metaphor and Political Discourse: Analogical Reasoning in Debates About Europe. London, Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Neumann I.B., 1998. Constructing Europe: Russia as Europe's Other. Hedetoft U. (ed.). Political Symbols, Symbolic Politics: European Identities in Transformation. Aldershot; Brookfield, Ashgate.
  • Pan Z.D., Kosicki G.M., 1993. Framing Analysis: An Approach to News Discourse. Political Communication, no. (10), pp. 55-75.
  • Reese S.D. et al. (eds.), 2001. Framing Public Life: Perspectives on Media and Our Understanding of the Social World. Mahwah, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Robins S., Mayer R.E., 2000. The Metaphor Framing Effect: Metaphorical Reasoning About Text-Based Dilemmas. Discourse Processes, no. 30 (1), pp. 57-86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/ S15326950dp3001_03.
  • Scheufele D.A., 1999. Framing as a Theory of Media Effects. Journal of Communication, no. 49 (1), pp. 103-122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/ 49.1.103.
  • Skrynnikova I.V, Astafurova T.N., 2020. Constructing Modern Russian Identity Through Discourse Metaphors. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 2. Yazykoznanie, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 107-115. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15688/jvolsu2.2020.3.10.
  • Skrynnikova I.V., Astafurova T.N., Sytina N.A., 2017. Power of Metaphor: Cultural Narratives in Political Persuasion. Current Issues of Linguistics and Didactics: The Interdisciplinary Approach in Humanities. Proceedings of the 7th International Scientific and Practical Conference (Atlantic Press), pp. 285-290.
  • Sopory P., Dillard, J.P., 2002. The Persuasive Effects of Metaphor: A Meta-Analysis. Human Communication Research, no. 28 (3), pp. 382-419.
  • Trompenaars A., Hampden-Turner Ch., 1993. The Seven Cultures of Capitalism: Value Systems for Creating wealth in the United States, Japan, Germany, France, Britain, Sweden, and the Netherlands. New York, Doubleday Business. 405 р.
  • Wodak R., De Cillia R., Reisigl M., 1999. The Discursive Construction of National Identity. Discourse and Society, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 149-173.
Еще
Статья научная