Domestic remedies that have to be exhausted in Ukraine when everyone applying to international judicial institutions or to the relevant bodies of international organizations

Бесплатный доступ

The purpose of the article is to identify domestic remedies that have to be exhausted in Ukraine when everyone applying to international judicial institutions or to the relevant bodies of international organizations. The above analysis allows to reach such conclusions: the legislation of Ukraine provides a single cassation and review of the judgment. The law may provide for other forms of appeal and review of decisions of courts of general jurisdiction; domestic remedies that have to be exhausted in Ukraine when everyone applying to international judicial institutions or to the relevant bodies of international organizations are high specialized courts as courts of cassation for civil and criminal, commercial and administrative matters. High specialized courts are the High Specialized Court of Ukraine for Civil and Criminal Cases, the Supreme Economic Court of Ukraine, the Supreme Administrative Court of Ukraine.

Еще

Domestic remedies, supreme court of ukraine, the high specialized courts

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/147202379

IDR: 147202379

Список литературы Domestic remedies that have to be exhausted in Ukraine when everyone applying to international judicial institutions or to the relevant bodies of international organizations

  • Conclusion of Chief Scientific Expert Department of the Supreme Council of Ukraine of June 3, 2010 on the Draft Law of Ukraine «On the Judicial System and Status of Judges» (registration number 6450 from 31.05.2010). URL: http://w1.c1.rada.gov.ua/pls/zweb2/webproc4_1?pf3511=37806 (accessed: 10.12.2013).
  • Constitution of Ukraine adopted at the Fifth Session of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine on June 28, 1996 № 254k/96-VR//Supreme Council of Ukraine. 1996. №30. P.141.
  • Decision of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine in the case of the constitutional petition of 46 People's Deputies of Ukraine concerning official interpretation of the terms «highest judicial body», «supreme judicial body», «cassation» referred to in Articles 125, 129 of the Constitution of Ukraine, Kyiv. Case number 1-1/2010 March 11, 2010 №8-rp/2010//Official Bulletin of Ukraine. 2010. №21. P. 31. Section 882.
  • Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the case «Civet vs France», 1999. URL: http://sim.law.uu.nl/sim/caselaw/Hof.nsf/e4ca7ef017f8c04 5c1256849004787f5/4bd5d525b8529019c12567fb0032946b?OpenDocument (accessed: 10.12.2013).
  • Judicial Reform in Ukraine: current results and prospects for the next//Informational materials for the expert discussion on «Judiciary reform in 2010: whether it brings justice in Ukraine up to European standards?». Kyiv, 2013. 130 p.
  • Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the case «Ponomariov vs Ukraine», April 3, 2008. URL: http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/(accessed: 10.12.2013).
  • The conclusion of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine in the constitutional proposal of the President of Ukraine to report on compliance with the Constitution of Ukraine of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (case of the Rome Statute) Kyiv, July 11, 2001 Case №1-35/2001 №3-v/2001//Official Bulletin of Ukraine. 2001. №28. P. 104. Article 1267.
  • Vasil Onopenko. I was to. Кyiv, 2010. 494 p.
  • Romanyuk Ya.M. First Deputy Chairman of the Supreme Court of Ukraine, Chairman of the courts of Ukraine//Bulletin of the Supreme Court of Ukraine. 2013. №2. P. 15.
Еще
Статья научная