Evaluation in institutions of higher education: an analysis from the agency theory and the theory of resources and capabilities

Автор: Vargas-hernandez Jose G., M. G. Barraza mayra G.

Журнал: Интеграция образования @edumag-mrsu

Рубрика: Международный опыт интеграции образования

Статья в выпуске: 1 (82), 2016 года.

Бесплатный доступ

Introduction: the objective of this paper is to explain through the agency theory and theory of resources and capacities as is the process of assessment in higher education institutions. Materials and Methods: the methods used are the analytical and descriptive of the literature review on the issue of evaluation occurring in Institutions of Higher Education in Mexico. Results: the actors that are involved in the decision-making and the use that is giving the resources derived from repeatedly to practices that opportunistic diminishing the value that is given to the evaluation, in addition to the decrease in team work. After describing the background and delimitation of the problem, it is justified the aim of this paper which is to present an overview of how the evaluation process, the actors involved and conflicts that may arise as a result of that process. Discussion and Conclusions: as a theoretical background of this paper, it is supported by the agency theory and the resource and capabilities theory both from the field of strategy. The main conclusion argues that the evaluation of Higher Education Institutions in Mexico should be a tool to encourage continuous improvement. Self-evaluation becomes a key part of these processes, but this will be useful to the extent that stakeholders are aware of their actions, that there is a change of mentality less focused on control, money and the market, greater teamwork and knowledge generation applicable to the local context.

Еще

Educational quality, evaluation, university governance, resources, higher education

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/147137145

IDR: 147137145   |   DOI: 10.15507/1991-9468.082.020.201601.010-019

Список литературы Evaluation in institutions of higher education: an analysis from the agency theory and the theory of resources and capabilities

  • Fernandez Lamarra N. La evaluacion de la calidad y su acreditacion en la educacion superior en America Latina y el MERCOSUR. in: Mora J, Fernandez N. Educacion Superior convergencia entre America Latina y Europa, Procesos de evaluacion y acreditacion de la calidad. Argentina: Universidad Nacional de Tres de Febrero; 2005. p. 95-114.
  • Casanova Cardiel H, Gomez RR. Universidad contemporanea. Politica y gobierno, 2. Mexico: Centro de Estudios sobre la Universidad-UNAM; 1999.
  • Sander B. Gestion y administracion de los sistemas educacionales: problemas y tendencias. Perspectivas: revista trimestral de educacion. 1989; 2(19):243-260.
  • Vargas-Hernandez JG, Guerra Garcia E, Bojorquez Gutierrez A. Gestion estrategica de organizaciones. Buenos Aires: Ediciones insumisos Latinoamericanos; 2014.
  • Martinez Rizo F. Usos y abusos de la evaluacion educativa. Este Pais. 2010; 232:24-27.
  • Villasenor Garcia G. La evaluacion de la educacion superior: su funcion social. Reencuentro. 2003; 36:20-29. Available from: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=34003603 (accessed 12.12.2015).
  • ibarra Colado E. impacto de la evaluacion en la Educacion Superior Mexicana: valoracion y debates. Revista de la Educacion Superior. 2009. 38(149):173-182.
  • Peng M. Global Strategy. Cincinnati: Thomson South-Western; 2012.
  • Wernerfelt B. A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal; 1984; 5:171-180.
  • House ER. Evaluacion, etica y poder. Espana: Morata; 2000.
  • Varela Petito G. La educacion superior en Mexico. Planeacion, evaluacion y entorno. Buenos Aires: Ed. Mino y Davila; 2008.
  • Toro D. En enfoque estrategico de la responsabilidad social corporativa: revision de la literatura academica. intangible Capital. 2006; 2(14):338-358.
  • Lopez Zarate R. Formas de gobierno y gobernabilidad institucional. Analisis comparativo de seis instituciones de educacion superior. Mexico: ANUiES; 2003.
  • Eisenhardt K. Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review. 1989; 14:57-74.
  • Fama E, Jensen M. Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics. 1983; 26:301-325.
  • Daily C, Dalton D, Cannella A. Corporate governance. Academy of Management Review. 2003; 28:371-382.
  • ibarra Colado E. Prologo. in: Porter L. La universidad de papel. Ensayo sobre la educacion superior en Mexico. Mexico: UNAM/CiiCH; 2003. p. 7-30.
  • Zajac E, Westphal J. Director reputation, CEO-board power, and the dynamics of board interlocks. Administrative Science Quarterly. 1996; 41:507-529.
  • Latapi Sarre P. Una buena educacion. Reflexiones sobre la calidad. Mexico: Universidad de Colima; 2008.
Еще
Статья научная