Financial tools to develop social entrepreneurship

Автор: Popov Evgenii V., Veretennikova Anna Yu., Kozinskaya Kseniya M.

Журнал: Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast @volnc-esc-en

Рубрика: Public finance

Статья в выпуске: 5 (65) т.12, 2019 года.

Бесплатный доступ

Social entrepreneurship, being a relatively new activity for the Russian economy, requires the development of conditions and support mechanisms; this helps address social issues in society and also stimulates civic activity in this regard. Our paper classifies financial tools according to types of investors with different financial requirements, and analyzes the availability of these tools for the development of social entrepreneurship. We place special emphasis on mezzanine financing, social impact bonds, impact investing, and hybrid financing. In order to determine the availability of financial tools that are used to develop social entrepreneurship in Russia, we analyze financial statements of social entrepreneurs included in the catalog, formed by the Fund “Our Future”. The analysis used the coefficients of autonomy, current liquidity, profit (EBIT) and its growth rate in 2017. We have revealed that only nine of the considered organizations, which is less than 22%, meet the stated requirements and can apply for loans. Thus, we show that it is necessary to develop investment tools with lower financial requirements. Theoretical importance of our research findings consists in the fact that they expand theoretical and methodological provisions for studying social entrepreneurship in terms of systematization of financial tools used in international practice. The findings of our research are relevant in the practical aspect as well, because they help identify low availability of financial tools used in the Russian practice. The obtained data can be used to elaborate a strategy for development of this type of activity at different levels of management.

Еще

Social entrepreneurship, financial tools, impact investing, social impact bonds, accessibility

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/147224225

IDR: 147224225   |   DOI: 10.15838/esc.2019.5.65.6

Список литературы Financial tools to develop social entrepreneurship

  • Popov E.V., Veretennikova A.Yu., Naumov I.V., Kozinskaya K.M. Non-formal institutional environment of social entrepreneurship. Ekonomicheskie i sotsial'nye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz=Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 2018, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 217-234. 10.15838/esc.2018.4.58.14. (In Russian). DOI: 10.15838/esc.2018.4.58.14.(InRussian)
  • Desa G., Basu S. Optimization or bricolage? Overcoming resource constraints in global social entrepreneurship. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 2013, no. 7, pp. 26-49.
  • Di Domenico M., Haugh H., Tracey P. Social bricolage: theorizing social value creation in social enterprises. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 2010, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 681-703.
  • Aldrich H., Kenworthy A. The accidental entrepreneur: Campbellian antinomies and organizational foundings. In: Baum J., McKelvey B. (Eds.).Variations in Organization Science: In Honour of Donald T. Campbell. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 2005.
  • Mair J., Martí I. Social entrepreneurship research: a source of explanation, prediction, and delight. Journal of World Business, 2006, no. 41 (1), pp. 36-44. DOI: 10.1016/j.jwb.2005.09.002
  • Crimmings J., Kiel M. Enterprise in the Nonprofit Sector. Washington, DC: Partners for Livable Places, 1983.
  • Spear R., Defourny J., Favreau L., Laville J.-L. Tackling Social Exclusion in Europe. The Contribution of the Social Economy. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2001.
  • Dees J., Anderson B. Framing a theory of entrepreneurship: building on two schools of practice and thought". ARNOVA Occasional Paper Series: Research on Social Entrepreneurship: Understanding and Contributing to an Emerging Field, 2006, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 39-66.
  • Popov E.V., Veretennikova A.Yu., Kozinskaya K.M. World scientific schools of social entrepreneurship research. Vestnik Tyumenskogo gosudarstvennogo universitet. Sotsial'no-ekonomicheskie i pravovye issledovaniya=Tyumen State University Herald. Social, Economic, and Law research, 2019, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 157-177. (In Russian).
  • Nyssens M. (Ed.) Social Enterprise: At the Crossroads of Markets, Public Policies and Civil Society. London: Routledge, Taylor Francis Group, 2006.
  • DOI: 10.4324/9780203946909
  • Popov E.V., Veretennikova A.Yu., Kozinskaya K.M. Social entrepreneurship as an object of institutional analysis. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Seriya: Ekonomika=Perm University Herald. ECONOMY, 2017, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 360-374. (In Russian).
  • Barinova V. Zarubezhnyi opyt razvitiya sotsial'nogo predprinimatel'stva v vozmozhnost' ego primeneniya v Rossii [Foreign Experience in the Development of Social Entrepreneurship in the Possibility of Its Application in Russia]. Moscow: In-t ekonomicheskoi politiki imeni E.T. Gaidara, 2018. P. 100.
  • Harji K., Jackson E.T. Accelerating Impact: Achievements, Challenges and What's Next in Building the Impact Investing Industry. New York, NY: The Rockefeller Foundation, 2012.
  • Gladilin A.A., Glotova I.I., Tomilina E.P. Social bonds as a tool for financing higher education. KANT, 2017, no. 2, pp. 118-123. (In Russian).
  • Cox J., Nguyen T., Thorpe A., Ishizaka A., Chakhar S., Meech L., Being seen to care: The relationship between self-presentation and contributions to online pro-social crowdfunding campaigns. Computers in Human Behavior, 2018, vol., 83, pp. 45-55.
  • Achleitner A., Spiess-Knafl W., Financing of social entrepreneurship. In: Volkmann C., Tokarski K., Ernst K. (Eds.). Social Entrepreneurship & Social Business. Wiesbaden: Gabler, 2012. Pp. 157-173.
  • Andreoni J. Impure altruism and donations to public goods: a theory of warm-glow giving. The Economic Journal, 1990, vol. 100, no. 2, pp. 464-477.
  • Emerson J. The blended value proposition: integrating social and financial returns. California Management Review, 2003, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 35-51.
  • Bishop M., Green M. Philanthropocapitalism. London: A&C Black, 2008.
  • Letts C., Ryan W., Grossman A. Virtuous capital: what foundations can learn from venture capitalists. Harvard Business Review, 1997, vol. 75, no. 2, pp. 36-44.
  • Milligan K., Schöning M. Taking a realistic approach to impact investing: observations from the World Economic Forum's Global Agenda Council on social innovation. Innovations, 2011, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 155-166.
  • Yunus M. Social business entrepreneurs are the solution. In: Nicholls A. (Ed.). Social Entrepreneurship: New Models of Sustainable Social Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.
  • Defourny J., Nyssens M. Social enterprise in Europe: recent trends and developments. Social Enterprise Journal, 2008, vol. 4, pp. 202-228.
  • Harris R., Raviv A. The theory of capital structure. The Journal of Finance, 1991, vol. XLVI, no. 1, pp. 297-355.
  • Hoogendorn B., Pennings E., Thurik R., What do we know about social entrepreneurship? An analysis of empirical research. International Review of Entrepreneurship, 2010, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 1-42.
  • Collier P. The Bottom Billion: Why the Poorest Countries Are Failing and What Can be Done About It. New York: Oxford University Press, 2007.
Еще
Статья научная