Этноэкономика: некоторые подходы различных школ научной и экономической мысли
Бесплатный доступ
Актуальность. Теория этноэкономики характеризуется значительным концептуальным разнообразием, однако целостное представление о данном феномене в научной литературе по-прежнему не сформировано. Междисциплинарный характер исследования, находящегося на стыке экономики, этнологии, социологии и географии, требует систематизации подходов различных научных школ для эффективного включения этноэкономической составляющей в стратегии регионального развития.
Этноэкономика, методология, экономическая мысль, этнос, этнография, социология, экономическая география, марксизм, институционализм, региональная экономика
Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/14137366
IDR: 14137366 | УДК: 332 | DOI: 10.24412/2220-2404-2026-4-31
Ethnoeconomics: some approaches from various schools of scientific and economic thought
Relevance. The theory of ethnic economy is characterized by significant conceptual diversity, however, a holistic view of this phenomenon is still not formed in the scientific literature. The interdisciplinary nature of the research, which is located at the intersection of economics, ethnology, sociology and geography, requires the systematization of approaches from various scientific schools in order to effectively integrate the ethnoeconomical component into regional development strategies. Goal. Systematization of scientific approaches to the category of «ethnic economy» from the positions of various schools of economic and humanitarian thought. Tasks. To analyze the methodological aspects of the main scientific disciplines related to ethnographic phenomena (ethnography, sociology, economic geography); to consider the interpretation of the nature of ethnic economy within the framework of Marxist ideology and institutional economic theory; to perform a comparative analysis of the forms of adaptive evolution of ethnic groups; to summarize foreign and domestic research experience of ethnographic processes. Scientific novelty. It consists in a comprehensive comparison of the methods of various scientific disciplines to identify their specific contribution to the understanding of ethnoeconomical processes. The author's typologization of the adaptive evolution of ethnic groups at the junction of ethnographic and ethnographic approaches is proposed, highlighting the traditional and innovative components of management. The role of institutional macroeconomics in studying the dynamics of regional and local ethnoeconomical systems is substantiated.