Online course viewings and their effects on performances in COVID-19 distance education period
Автор: Erdem Demir, Çağla Ediz, Aykut Hamit Turan
Журнал: International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education @ijcrsee
Рубрика: Original research
Статья в выпуске: 2 vol.11, 2023 года.
Бесплатный доступ
Despite numerous studies examining student preferences in terms of live and recorded lecture viewings, the effects of lesson viewings on online platforms have been limitedly studied. In this study, the rates of attending live lectures and viewing lecture recordings in the Covid-19 era were examined, and attendance and viewings effects on final scores in these courses were evaluated. For this purpose, data from online education systems of live and record viewings for Turkish Literature, mathematics, and biostatistics classes in the spring semester of 2021-2022, belonging to 13 Turkish universities and 2082 students, were utilized. We found that (1) Thirteen percent of the students did not view any live or recorded courses, and approximately one-third did not enter the final exam; (2) The students in state universities have significantly higher record viewing rates than those in private universities with medium effect size, (3) Females present significantly higher live viewings and record viewing rates than males with small effect sizes; (4) Biostatistics has moderate-high correlations between viewing rates and final scores. On the other hand, there are no or weak relationships between the viewing rates and final scores for Turkish literature and mathematics, in which study materials can be widely accessed from many sources different from biostatistics.
Distance education, final scores, live lecture attendance, recorded lecture viewing
Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/170198712
IDR: 170198712 | DOI: 10.23947/2334-8496-2023-11-2-247-255
Текст научной статьи Online course viewings and their effects on performances in COVID-19 distance education period
It is believed that increasing class attendance enhances class engagement and success ( Moores, Birdi and Higson, 2019 ; Wongtrakul and Dangprapai, 2020 ). Hence, minimum attendance requirement to classes is mandatory in most universities. While some studies support this fact, some studies have concluded that attendance does not affect course success ( Gomis-Porqueras and Rodrigues-Neto, 2018 ; Kaushik, Kumar and Kumar, 2021 ). Even if the students physically attend the lessons, they may not provide behavior engagement, emotional engagement, and cognitive engagement, which are three dimensions of class engagement ( Hu and Li, 2017 ; Qiping Kong, 2003 ). Compulsory attendance to the course may lead the students to attend the course without listening to the course, such as surfing the internet, and so this does not contribute to their success ( Nieuwoudt, 2020 ). Kaushik, Kumar and Kumar (2021) , stating that compulsory attendance may hinder academic success, defined the reasons for this as students wasting the interval when the course intervals are long, spending too much time on their way to and from school, and thinking that asynchronous courses would be sufficient for some courses. Some of these reasons do not apply to distance education. Because in online education, time is not spent going to school; the students can watch the lectures anywhere and anytime they want. So the effects of physical attendance on success can be different for online courses.
So far, the comparison of live and recorded lecture viewing is mostly about students’ preferences, and studies measuring their effects on academic achievement are limited ( Islam, Kim and Kwon, 2020 ; Howard, Meehan and Parnell, 2018 ; Trenholm, Alcock and Robinson, 2012 ; Nieuwoudt, 2020 ; Kahui et al., 2022 ; Le, 2022 ). In addition, generally studies in literature are limited mostly with schools or lectures. We want to evaluate student live and recorded course viewings, which are very important parts of the distance education system, especially in the Covid-19 period. We hope that this study will be beneficial for policy makers, education system developers and educators interested in online lesson viewings in

Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license .
universities’ distance education. This study is important for the evaluation of selected three courses in 13 universities. First we have seen that in the literature (For example: Shahabadi and Uplane, 2015 ), students have different perspectives for synchronized and recorded lectures. Hence, we classified our viewed classes in two classes as synchronized and live lectures. Existing studies indicated that based on gender, there would be some differences in distance education as well ( Gupta and Saks, 2013 ; Kahui et al., 2022 ). Hence, we created a category for gender. On the other hand, we have not come up with any literature regarding the differences in public and private university students’ interests in viewing the online lectures. In order to provide support to the literature, we also investigated public and private university difference in our study. Finally, whether students attend the final or not was the third category in our study. We also investigated the participants online class participation in all these categories specifically for Covid 19 period. Hence, we propose the following hypothesis.
The remain of this study continues with literature review. In the third section of this study, download and data preparation processes are explained. In the fourth section, analyzes and findings are provided. In this section, first of all, descriptive statistics about lesson viewings, and the distribution of student lecture viewings and entering the final exam are given. Afterward, we investigated whether there were significant differences in lesson viewings according to gender, type of university, and entering the final exam. Later, it was investigated whether the lectures’ viewing rates had an effect on final scores. In the last section, the findings were also elaborated.
Список литературы Online course viewings and their effects on performances in COVID-19 distance education period
- Alamer, A., & Alharbi, F. (2021). Synchronous distance teaching of radiology clerkship promotes medical students’ learning and engagement. Insights into Imaging, 12(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-021-00984-w
- Basha, I., Hussein, A., & Maklad, N. (2021). Distance learning applicability in Egyptian construction engineering education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 16(3), 220-234. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet. v16i03.18019
- Basilotta-Gómez-Pablos, V., Matarranz, M., Casado-Aranda, L. A., & Otto, A. (2022). Teachers’ digital competencies in higher education: a systematic literature review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00312-8
- Bassili, J. N. (2008). Motivation and cognitive strategies in the choice to attend lectures or watch them online. International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education, 22(3), 129– 148. https://www.ijede.ca/index.php/jde/article/view/50
- Buluk, B., & Eşitti, B. (2020). Koronavirüs (COVID-19) sürecinde uzaktan eğitimin turizm lisans öğrencileri tarafindan değerlendirilmesi. [Evaluation of distance education by tourism undergraduate students during the coronavirus (COVID-19) process]. Journal of Awareness, 5(3), 285-298. https://doi.org/10.26809/joa.5.021
- Can, E. (2020). Coronavirüs (Covid-19) pandemisi ve pedagojik yansımaları: Türkiye’de açık ve uzaktan eğitim uygulamaları [Coronavirus (Covid-19) pandemic and its pedagogical reflections: Open and distance education practices in Turkey]. Açıköğretim Uygulamaları ve Araştırmaları Dergisi, 6(2), 11-53. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/auad/ issue/55662/761354
- Cirakoglu, N. Y., & Ozbay, Y. (2022). Evaluation of distance learning and online exam experience of Turkish undergraduate dental students during the Covid-19 pandemic. Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice, 25(6), 916. https://doi.org/10.4103/ njcp.njcp_1949_21
- Corder, G. W., & Foreman, D. I. (2009). Nonparametric Statistics for Non-statisticians. New Jersey: Wiley & Sons. https://doi. org/10.1002/9781118165881
- Durak, G., Çankaya, S., & İzmirli, S. (2020). COVID-19 pandemi döneminde Türkiye’deki üniversitelerin uzaktan eğitim sistemlerinin incelenmesi [Examining the distance education systems of universities in Turkey during the COVID-19 pandemic period]. Necatibey Eğitim Fakültesi Elektronik Fen Ve Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi, 14(1), 787-809. https://doi. org/10.17522/balikesirnef.743080
- Fei, J., Mather, C., Elmer, S., Allan, C., Chin, C., & Chandler, L. (2013). Use of Echo360 generated materials and its impact on class attendance. In ASCILITE-Australian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education Annual Conference (pp. 288-292). Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education.
- Gomis-Porqueras, P., & Rodrigues-Neto, J. A. (2018). Teaching technologies, attendance, learning and the optimal level of access to online materials. Economic Modelling, 73, 329-342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2018.04.009
- Gunawardena, C. N., & McIsaac, M. S. (2013). Distance education. In Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 361-401). Routledge.
- Gupta, A., & Saks, N. S. (2013). Exploring medical student decisions regarding attending live lectures and using recorded lectures. Medical Teacher, 35(9), 767-771. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2013.801940
- Gysbers, V., Johnston, J., Hancock, D., & Denyer, G. (2011). Why do students still bother coming to lectures, when everything is available online?. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education, 19(2). Retrieved from https://openjournals.library.sydney.edu.au/CAL/article/view/4887
- Howard, E., Meehan, M., & Parnell, A. (2018). Live lectures or online videos: students’ resource choices in a first-year university mathematics module. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 49(4), 530-553. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2017.1387943
- Hu, M., & Li, H. (2017, June). Student engagement in online learning: A review. In 2017 International Symposium on Educational Technology (ISET) (pp. 39-43). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISET.2017.17
- Islam, M., Kim, D. A., & Kwon, M. (2020). A comparison of two forms of instruction: Pre-recorded video lectures vs. live ZOOM lectures for education in the business management field. Sustainability, 12(19), 8149. https://doi.org/10.3390/ su12198149
- Jones, T. J. (2022). Relationships Between Undergraduate Student Performance, Engagement, and Attendance in an Online Environment. In Frontiers in Education (p. 250). https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.906601
- Ilgaz, H., & Afacan Adanır, G. (2020). Providing online exams for online learners: Does it really matter for them?. Education and Information Technologies, 25(2), 1255-1269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-10020-6
- Kahui, V., Genç, M., Agarwal, N., & Lord, A. (2022). Zoom lecture attendance patterns during the 2020 lockdown in New Zealand. Applied Economics Letters, 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2022.2038774
- Kaushik, A., Kumar, N., & Kumar, P. (2021). Effect of partial compulsory attendance on academic performance of technical education students. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.202 1.1948440
- Kerby, D. S. (2014). The simple difference formula: An approach to teaching nonparametric correlation. Comprehensive Psychology, 3, 11-IT. https://doi.org/10.2466/11.IT.3.1
- Kurtuncu, M., & Kurt, A. (2020). Covid-19 pandemisi doneminde hemsirelik ogrencilerinin uzaktan egitim konusunda yasadiklari sorunlar. Avrasya Sosyal ve Ekonomi Arastirmalari Dergisi, 7(5), 66-77. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/ asead/issue/54658/725503
- Larkin, H. E. (2010). “ But they won’t come to lectures...” The impact of audio recorded lectures on student experience and attendance. Australasian journal of educational technology, 26(2). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1093
- Le, K. (2022). Pre-recorded lectures, live online lectures, and student academic achievement. Sustainability, 14(5), 2910. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14052910
- McKenna, B. A., & Kopittke, P. M. (2018). Engagement and performance in a first year natural resource science course. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 34(3), 233-242. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12236
- Mirza, A. A., & Al-Abdulkareem, M. (2011). Models of e-learning adopted in the Middle East. Applied computing and informatics, 9(2), 83-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aci.2011.05.001
- Moores, E., Birdi, G. K., & Higson, H. E. (2019). Determinants of university students’ attendance. Educational Research, 61(4), 371-387. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2019.1660587
- Nichols, S. C., Xia, Y. Y., Parco, M., & Bailey, E. G. (2022). Participation and performance by gender in synchronous online lectures: three unique case studies during emergency remote teaching. Journal of microbiology & biology education, 23(1), e00281-21. https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.00281-21
- Nieuwoudt, J. E. (2020). Investigating synchronous and asynchronous class attendance as predictors of academic success in online education. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 36(3), 15-25. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.5137
- Ozdemir, D., & Ugur, M. E. (2021). Model proposal on the determınatıon of student attendance ın dıstance educatıon wıth face recognıtıon technology. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 22(1), 19-32. https://doi.org/10.17718/ tojde.849872
- Özen, K. E., Erdoğan, K., & Malas, M. A. (2022). Assessment of the opinions and experiences of anatomy educators regarding the distance anatomy education in medical facilities under the effect of COVID-19 in Turkey. Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-022-02934-7
- Qiping Kong, Student engagement in Mathematics Teaching, Shanghai:East China Normal University Press, 2003.
- Shahabadi, M. M., & Uplane, M. (2015). Synchronous and asynchronous e-learning styles and academic performance of e-learners. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 176, 129-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.453
- Sorochinsky, M. A. (2021). Digital competence of teachers and students in yakutia: problems and prospects of E-learning during the pandemic. Educação (UFSM), 46(1), e99/ 1–16. https://doi.org/10.5902/1984644466423
- Tayem, Y. I., Almarabheh, A. J., Hamza, E. A., & Deifalla, A. (2022). Perceptions of Medical Students on Distance Learning During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Study from Bahrain. Advances in Medical Education and Practice, 13, 345. https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S357335
- Trenholm, S., Alcock, L., & Robinson, C. L. (2012). Mathematics lecturing in the digital age. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 43(6), 703-716. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2011.646325
- Turan, Z., Kucuk, S., & Cilligol Karabey, S. (2022). The university students’ self-regulated effort, flexibility and satisfaction in distance education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19(1), 1-19. https://doi. org/10.1186/s41239-022-00342-w
- Wongtrakul, W., & Dangprapai, Y. (2020). Effects of Live Lecture Attendance on the Academic Achievement of Preclinical Medical Students. Medical Science Educator, 30(4), 1523-1530. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-020-01068-y
- Yang, X., Li, D., Liu, X., & Tan, J. (2021). Learner behaviors in synchronous online prosthodontic education during the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry, 126(5), 653-657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. prosdent.2020.08.004
- Yoon, C., Oates, G., & Sneddon, J. (2014). Undergraduate mathematics students’ reasons for attending live lectures when recordings are available. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 45(2), 227-240. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2013.822578