Ретроспективный анализ зарубежных подходов к контролю и оценке иноязычной письменной речи

Бесплатный доступ

Представлен анализ эволюции зарубежных подходов к оценке письменной речи. Начиная с 1960-х гг. разработка методического инструментария определяется поиском приемов для повышения надежности оценки. Их трансформация соотносится с периодизацией методических подходов к обучению письменной речи. Процедуры оценки определяются переходом от собственно контроля и диагностики к актуализации развивающих и ориентирующих функций.

Иноязычная письменная речь, контроль, оценка, стандартизированный подход, функции контроля

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/148167319

IDR: 148167319

Список литературы Ретроспективный анализ зарубежных подходов к контролю и оценке иноязычной письменной речи

  • Behizadeh N., Engelhard G. Jr. Historical view of the influences of measurement and writing theories on the practice of writing assessment in the United States//Assessing Writing. 2011. № 16. P. 189-211.
  • Brown H.D. Language assessment: Principles and classroom practices. Longman: United States of America, 2004.
  • Brown J.D., Hudson T. The alternatives in language assessment. TESOL Quarterly, 1998. 32(4). P. 653-675.
  • Caudery T. The validity of timed essay tests in the assessment of writing skills//ELT Journal. 1990. № 44. P. 122-131.
  • Connor U. Linguistic/rhetorical measures for international persuasive student writing//Research in the Teaching of English. 1990. 24. P. 67-87.
  • Cooper Ch.R., Odell’s L. Evaluating Writing: Describing, Measuring, Judging. National Council of Teachers of English, Urbanl, Ili., 1977.
  • Crusan D. Assessment in the Second Language Writing Classroom. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2010.
  • Diederich P.B., French J.W., Carlton S.T. Factors in judgements of writing ability//Research Bulletin. RB-61-15. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service, 1961.
  • Elliot N. On a scale: A social history of writing assessment in America. New York, NY: Peter Lang Publishing, 2005.
  • Elliott J.G. Dynamic assessment in educational contexts: Purpose and promise//Dynamic assessment: Prevailing models and applications. 2000. Vol. 6. P. 713-740.
  • Hamp-Lyons L. The scope of writing assessment//Assessing Writing. 2002. № 8. P. 5-16.
  • Hamp-Lyons L., Condon W. Assessing the portfolio: Principles for practice, theory, and research. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton, 2000.
  • Lantolf J.P. Dynamic assessment: The dialectic integration of instruction and assessment//Language Teaching Journal. 2009. Vol. 42. № 3. P. 355-368.
  • Matsuda P. Process and post-process: A discursive history. Journal of Second Language. 2003. № 12. P. 5-83.
  • Newkirk T. The politics of intimacy: The defeat of Barrett Wendell at Harvard//Taking stock: The writing process movement in the ’90s. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook, 1994. P. 115-131.
  • Norris J.M. Interpretations, intended uses and designs in task-based language assessment//Language Testing. 2002. № 19(4). P. 337-346.
  • Page E.B. The imminence of grading essays be computer//Phi Lelta Kappan. 1966. January. P. 238-243.
  • Shaw S.D. Automated writing assessment: a review of four conceptual models//Research Notes. 2004. № 17. P. 13-18.
  • Shrestha P., Coffin C. Dynamic assessment, tutor mediation and academic writing development//Assessing Writing. 2012. № 17. P. 55-70.
  • Thorndike E.L. Educational psychology . New York: Teachers College, Columbia University, 1913. URL: https://catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/100414378 (дата обращения: 13.04.2018).
  • Xiaoxiao L., Yan L. A case study of dynamic assessment in EFL process writing//Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics. 2010. № 33(1). P. 24-40.
  • Yancey K.B. Looking Back as We Look Forward: Historicizing Writing Assessment//College Composition and Communication. 1999. Vol. 50. № 3. P. 483-503. Yancey, 1999
  • Yang N.D. Integrating portfolios into learning strategy-based instruction for EFL college students. IRAL. 2003. № 41. P. 293-317.
  • Yao L., Cheng L. A research on domestic research on EFL writing//Foreign Language World. 2005. № 5. P. 2-16.
Еще
Статья научная