Students’ satisfaction with blended learning programmes in the faculty of physical education

Автор: Al-Awamleh Aida

Журнал: Science for Education Today @sciforedu

Рубрика: Педагогика и психология для образования

Статья в выпуске: 5 т.9, 2019 года.

Бесплатный доступ

Introduction. Blended learning requires a virtual learning environment (VLE), which contributes to establishing learning communities. The Faculty of Physical Education at the University of Jordan has designed a number of courses which incorporate blended learning with contact classes and online components on the e-learning platform. The objective of the present study is to investigate if modes of blended learning affect students’ perceived achievement goals and satisfaction. Materials and Methods. The research model has been tested using a questionnaire survey. The sample consisted of 83 undergraduate sport students pursuing the courses in Motor Learning offered by the Faculty of Physical Education. Results. It was identified that students were satisfied with blended programmes and online learning environments (83 %). The findings have shown that Blended Learning rotation type (students rotate between online and traditional content within the fixed schedule) significantly affects learning satisfaction. Moreover, teaching quality received the highest satisfaction level when interaction significantly affected self-study. Conclusions. The feedback of students who are amongst the key stakeholders is essential to ensure a successful implementation of blended learning.

Еще

Blended learning, students' satisfaction, motor learning

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/147229466

IDR: 147229466   |   DOI: 10.15293/2658-6762.1905.03

Список литературы Students’ satisfaction with blended learning programmes in the faculty of physical education

  • Aslanian C. B., Clinefelter D. L. Online college students 2012: Comprehensive data on demands and preferences. - Louisville, KY: The Learning House, Inc, 2012. URL: https://www.learninghouse.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Online-College-Students-2012.pdf
  • Castle S. R., McGuire C. An analysis of student self-assessment of online, blended, and face-to-face learning environments: Implications for sustainable education delivery // International Education Studies. - 2010. - Vol. 3 (3). - P. 36-40. DOI: 10.5539/ies.v3n3p36
  • Garrison R., Kanuka H. Blended learning: Uncovering it transformative potential in higher education // The Internet and Higher Education. - 2004. - Vol. 7 (2). - P. 95-105. DOI: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.02.001
  • Horn M. B., Staker H., Hernandez A., Hassel B., Ableidinger J. The rise of K-12 blended learning. - Innosight Institute, 2011. URL: http://www.christenseninstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/The-rise-of-K-12-blended-learning.pdf
  • Johnson L., Adams Becker S., Estrada V., Freeman A. NMC Horizon Report: 2014 Higher Education Edition. - Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium, 2014. URL: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Johnson%2C%20L.%2C%20Becker%2C%20S.A.%2C%20Estrada%2C%20V.%2C%20Freeman%2C%20A.%3A%20NMC%20Horizon%20Report%3A%20Higher%20Education%20Edition%2C%20New%20Media%20Consortium%3A%20Austin%2C%20Texas%20%282014%29
  • Kyei-Blankson L., Ntuli E. (Eds.) Practical Applications in Blended Learning Environments: Experiences in K-20 Education. USA: IGI, 2014.
  • DOI: 10.4018/978-1-4666-4912-5
  • Means B. Toyama Y., Murphy R., Bakia M., Jones K. Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning: A Meta-Analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies Washington, DC: US Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development, 2009. URL: http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Evaluation%20of%20evidence-based%20practices%20in%20online%20learning%3A%20A%20meta-analysis%20and%20review%20of%20online%20learning%20studies&author=B.%20Means&author=Y.%20Toyama&author=R.%20Murphy&author=M.%20Bakia&author=K.%20Jones&publication_year=2009
  • Means B., Toyama Y., Murphy R., Bakia M., Jones K. Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning. A meta analysis and review of online learning studies. - Washington, D.C., 2010. URL: https://www2.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/tech/evidence-based-practices/finalreport.pdf
  • Naaj M. A., Nachouki M., Ankit A. Evaluating Student Satisfaction with Blended Learning in a Gender-Segregated Environment // Journal of Information Technology Education: Research. - 2012. - Vol. 11. - P. 185-199. URL: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Naaj%2C%20M.%20A.%2C%20Nachouki%2C%20M.%2C%20%26%20Ankit%2C%20A.%20%282012%29.%20Evaluating%20student%20satisfaction%20with%20blended%20learning%20in%20a%20gender-segregated%20environment.%20Journal%20of%20Information%20Technology%20Education%3A%20Research%2C%2011.%20ISSN-1547-9714.
  • Owston R. D., Garrison D. R., Cook K. Blended e-learning at Canadian universities: issues & practices // Bonk C. J., Graham C. R. (Eds.), Handbook of Blended Learning: global Perspectives, & Local Designs. - Pfeiffer Publishing, San Francisco, CA, 2006. - P. 338-350.
  • Pavlis-Korres M. Key Factors for Maximizing the Effectiveness of Blended E-Learning: The Outcome of the Internal Evaluation of a Distance Education Program for Adult Learning in Greece // Kyei-Blankson L., Ntuli, E. (Eds.) Practical Applications in Blended Learning Environments: Experiences in K-20 Education. - 2014. - P. 410-437.
  • DOI: 10.4018/978-1-4666-4912-5.ch026
  • Rienties B., Li N., Marsh V. Modeling and managing student satisfaction: use of student feedback to enhance learning experience. - Quality Assurance Agency, Gloucester, 2015. URL: http://oro.open.ac.uk/id/eprint/46057
  • Svanum S, Aigner C. The influences of course effort, mastery and performance goals, grade expectancies, and earned course grades on student ratings of course satisfaction // British Journal of Educational Psychology. - 2011. - Vol. 81 (4). - P. 667-679.
  • DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.2010.02011.x
  • Thurmond V, Wambach K. Towards an understanding of interactions in distance education // Online Journal of Nursing Informatics. - 2004. - Vol. 8 (2). URL: http://ojni.org/8_2/interactions.htm
  • Vaughan N. Student engagement and blended learning: Making the assessment connection // Education Sciences. - 2014. - Vol. 4 (4). - P. 247-264.
  • DOI: 10.3390/educsci4040247
  • Wu J. H., Tennyson R. D., Hsia T. L. A study of student satisfaction in a blended e-learning system environment // Computers and Education. - 2010. - Vol. 55 (1). - P. 155-164.
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.12.012
  • Alawamleh A. Blended learning in physical education school, 2018. URL: http://newsletter.ju.edu.jo/Lists/In TheSpotLight/Disp_Form.aspx?ID=10&Issue=2018-08
Еще
Статья научная