Tajm-šering i nepoštena poslovna praksa
Автор: Mićović Andrej
Журнал: Pravo - teorija i praksa @pravni-fakultet
Рубрика: Review paper
Статья в выпуске: 7-9 vol.29, 2012 года.
Бесплатный доступ
Od usvajanja Direktive EU 94/47 o zaštiti kupaca u pogledu pojedinih aspekata ugovora koji se odnose na kupovinu prava na vremenski podeljeno korišćenje nepokretnosti, taj oblik korišćenja je pretrpeo promene, a na tržištu su se pojavili i novi proizvodi za odmor slični tajm-šeringu. U praksi se pokazalo da Direktiva EU 94/47 nije sprečila pojavu ugovora sličnih tajm-šeringu, kojima se nastojalo da se zaobiđu odredbe Direktive. Nesavesni trgovci su na taj način izbegavali odgovornost po osnovu Direktive, znajući da ugovori slični tajm-šeringu ne potpadaju pod njen domašaj. Stoga je bilo potrebno usvojiti propise kojima bi se sprečila nepoštena poslovna praksa i ujedno zaštitila prava potrošača. To je učinjeno usvajanjem Direktiva EU 2005/29, 2006/114 i 2008/122. Predmet ovog rada biće prikaz nepoštene poslovne prakse u vezi sa tajm-šeringom, kao i pravna analiza rešenja sadržanih u svakoj od pomenutih direktiva EU.
Tajm-šering, ugovori slični tajm-šeringu, nepoštena poslovna praksa, zaštita prava potrošača
Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/170202580
IDR: 170202580 | УДК: 366.5
Time-sharing and unfair commercial practices
Since the adoption of Directive 94/47/EC on the protection of purchasers in respect of certain aspects of contracts relating to the purchase of the right to use immovable properties on a timeshare basis, timeshare has evolved and new holiday products similar to it have appeared on the market. Practice has proved that the Directive 94/47/EC did not prevent the appearance of time-share-like products, aiming to circumvent the provisions of the Directive. That way, rogue traders were avoiding any responsibility, knowing that time-share-like products fall out of the scope of the Directive. It was therefore necessary to adopt regulations to prevent unfair commercial practices and protect the consumers rights. This was done by adopting Directive 2005/29/EC, 2006/114/EC and 2008/122/EC. This paper will deal with unfair commercial practices with regard to time-sharing and the legal analysis of the solutions contained in each of these EU directives.
Список литературы Tajm-šering i nepoštena poslovna praksa
- Carić, S., (1996). Ugovor o time sharingu u našem pravu, Pravo – teorija i praksa, 13, (9), str. 66–71.
- Cutlip, M. S., Center, H. A., Broom, M. G., (2000). Effective Public Relations, Eight edition, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle river, New Jersey
- Desjardins, J., (2006). An introduction to Business Ethics, McGraw-Hill, New York
- Eidenmüller, H. (2011). Why withdrawal rights? European Review of Contract Law, 7 (1), pp. 1–24
- European Commission. Report: Timeshare in Europe. The experience of European Consumer Centers (ECCs)
- Geraint, H., (1990). Consumer Law – Advertising something for nothing. Law Society Gazzette (9), pp. 1–3
- Keirsbilck, B., (2011). The new European Law of unfair commercial practices and competition law, Hart publishing
- Mihajlović, B., (2012). Zaštita potrošača od nepoštenog poslovanja. Pravo i privreda, (4–6), str. 538–551
- Monti, G., (2007). The Revision of the Consumer Acquis from a Competition Law Perspective. European Review of Contract Law, 3 (3), pp. 295–314
- Morgan-Tazlor, M., (2011). Preventing distributions of promotions to consumers involving unfair practices – OFT application for order under Enterprise Act 2002: Office of Fair Trading v. Purely Creative Ltd et al. Communications Law, 16, (3), pp. 114–116
- Nenadović, S., (2010). Zaštita potrošača u pravu SAD, Pravo i privreda, (7–9), str. 619–636
- O’Keeffe, J., Laidlaw, A. (2007). Brussels watch: Tidying up EU consumer protection rules. Law Society Gazzette, Issue 17, pp. 1–2
- Protecting the consumers of Timeshare products, House of Lords, European Union Committee, 3rd Report of Session 2007–08
- Timotijević, A, (1999). Pojam i pravna priroda time sharinga, Pravo – teorija i praksa, 16, (12), str. 27–38
- Twigg-Flesner, C, (2008). Pre-contractual duties – from the acquis to the Common Frame of Reference, u: R. Schulze (ed), Common Frame of Reference and Existing EC contract law, München, Sellier
- Wilhelmsson, T., Twigg-Flesner, C, (2006). Pre-contractual information duties in the acquis communautaire. European Review of Contract Law 2 (4), PP. 441–470.
- Zimmermann, R., (2005). The New German Law of Obligations – Historical and Comparative Perspectives, Oxford University Press
- Direktive EU
- Direktiva EU 94/47 od 26. 10. 1994. o zaštiti kupaca u pogledu pojedinih aspekata ugovora koji se odnose na kupovinu prava na vremenski podeljeno korišćenje nepokretnosti
- Direktiva EU 2005/29 od 11.05.2005. o nepoštenoj poslovnoj praksi privrednih subjekata prema potrošačima na unutrašnjem tržištu.
- Direktiva EU 2006/114 od 12.12.2006. o obmanjujućem i upoređujućem oglašavanju
- Direktiva EU 2008/122 od 14 januara 2009 o zaštiti potrošača u pogledu pojedinih aspekata vremenski podeljenog korišćenja nepokretnosti, dugoročnih proizvoda za odmor, preprodaje i razmene
