Abiding IPRs in Technological Implications for Pakistan
Автор: Murtaza Hussain Shaikh, Ievet S.Karlson, Noor Ahmed Ansari, Mahreen Jurial Khan, Dai xiaoling
Журнал: International Journal of Education and Management Engineering(IJEME) @ijeme
Статья в выпуске: 1 vol.4, 2014 года.
Бесплатный доступ
The focal objective of this article is to analyze the role of intellectual property rights in technological implications within a general context. The performance of the IPRs system and its interaction with national innovation system with some degrees of success has also been highlighted. Major encounter over subsequently decade will be to identify policies and solutions that would permit marketplace economy to flourish in the framework of this intellectual property insurrection. There has been a lot of dispute on the role of intellectual property protection regime specially in fostering innovation, technology development of a country. IPRs are expected to emboli the innovation, by rewarding inventor with a grant of domination rights over the mercantile exploitation for a specified time period. This article tries to attempts to review the role of the IPR regime in technological development and also have suggested some policy implications for country like Pakistan and some reflecting lessons for other developing countries with similar settings and common characteristics.
Intellectual Property Rights, Knowledge, capabilities, Assets, Innovations, Benefits, Optimization, Reflection
Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/15013825
IDR: 15013825
Список литературы Abiding IPRs in Technological Implications for Pakistan
- C. Juma, “Intellectual Property Rights and Globalization”: Implications for Developing Countries, Center for International Development discussion paper, November 2011, Harvard University, USA.
- D. Archibugi,B. Lundvall (Eds.), The Globalising Learning Economy, Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 2008, United kingdom.
- Schmidt, K and Raymund Werle. Coordinating technology Studies International Standardization of Telecommunications. MIT: 40 J, ECON. 345, 353 (2009), Cambridge University Press, UK.
- J. Michie., “Formulating Effective Pro-Development National Intellectual Property Policies”, Paper presented in ICTSD dialogue, Bellagio Conference Center, 2012, Italy.
- Lach, J., W.H. Mangione-Smith, and M. Potkonjak, "Low overhead faulttolerant FPGA systems," IEEE Transactions on VLSI Systems, 2007 (special issue on FPGAs), Helsinki, Finland.
- Biehl, I. and B. Meyer, "Protocols for collusion-secure asymmetric fingerprinting," STACS 97, 14th Annual Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science, 1997, Lubeck, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
- Cantwell, J. ‘Innovation as the principal source of growth in the global economy’,(2010) 115-119 Cambridge University Press.UK.
- Fink, C. and P. Conceic?a?o, D.V. Gibons, M.V. Heitor, G. Sirilli (Eds.), Technology Policy and Innovation (special issue), Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 66 (1) (2001) 1–128, Germany.
- J. Niosi (Ed.), The Internationalization of Industrial R&D (special issue), Res. Policy 28 (2–3) (2011) 107–336, UK.
- World Bank report “Intellectual property: balancing incentives with competitive access’, in Global Economic Prospects”. 129-150, 2008 Washington, DC.USA.
- International Intellectual Property Rights Alliance’s (IIPRA) Special Reports. Available online at http//www.iipa.com [accessed on 19th February 2013].
