Академический обман в цифровой среде: социально-психологический анализ

Академический обман в цифровой среде: социально-психологический анализ

Автор: Безгодова Светлана Александровна, Микляева Анастасия Владимировна

Журнал: Science for Education Today @sciforedu

Рубрика: Педагогика и психология для образования

Статья в выпуске: 4 т.11, 2021 года.

Бесплатный доступ

Проблема и цель. В статье представлен обзор психологических исследований, посвященных изучению «электронного» академического обмана (академического обмана с использованием возможностей сети Интернет). Социально-психологическая специфика «электронного» академического обмана, отличающая его от традиционных форм академической нечестности, на сегодняшний день изучена довольно фрагментарно. Цель исследования заключается в выявлении социально-психологических факторов, определяющих вовлеченность обучающихся в «электронный» академический обман в условиях цифровизации образования. Методология. Для достижения цели исследования использовался метод систематического обзора научных работ, опубликованных в 1995-2021 гг. и индексируемых в базах данных Scopus и Web of Science. В соответствии с критериями (релевантные ключевые слова; наличие развернутого описания программы исследования, эмпирических результатов; русский или английский язык) в итоговый массив проанализированных публикаций были включены 55 статей. Результаты. Основные результаты заключаются в выявлении и характеристике индивидуально-психологических и контекстуально-средовых факторов «электронного» академического обмана. К индивидуально-психологическим факторам отнесены: установки обучающихся в отношении «электронного» академического обмана; академический опыт обучающихся; личностные особенности и социально-демографические характеристики обучающихся. В число контекстуально-средовых факторов вошли: оценка обучающимися распространенности «электронного» академического обмана в среде сверстников; отношение преподавателей к «электронному» академическому обману; институциональная политика в отношении «электронного» академического обмана. Заключение. В результате сделан вывод о том, что социально-психологическими факторами риска вовлечения школьников и студентов в «электронный» академический обман являются наличие у них предшествующего опыта академической нечестности, представление о приемлемости соответствующей формы академического поведения, дефицит учебной мотивации и саморегуляции, недостаточный уровень владения учебным материалом и сформированная информационная компетентность (индивидуально-психологические факторы), а также распространенность «электронного» академического обмана в образовательной организации на фоне отсутствия институциональной политики предотвращения соответствующей формы академического поведения и соответствующих действий педагогов (контекстуально-средовые факторы).

Еще

Академический обман, академическая честность, цифровизация образования, «электронный» академический обман, вовлеченность в «электронный» академический обман, социально-психологические факторы, школьники, студенты

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/147234573

IDR: 147234573   |   DOI: 10.15293/2658-6762.2104.04

Список литературы Академический обман в цифровой среде: социально-психологический анализ

  • Спасенников В. В., Андросов К. Ю. Академическое мошенничество и мотивация учебной деятельности студентов современных университетов // Эргодизайн. – 2020. – № 2. – С. 72–80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30987/2658-4026-2020-2-72-80 URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=42975752
  • Lawson R. A. Is Classroom cheating related to business students’ propensity to cheat in the “Real World? //Journal of Business Ethics. – 2004. – Vol. 49 (2). – P. 189–199. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BUSI.0000015784.34148.cb
  • Simkin M. G., Mcleod A. Why do college students cheat? // Journal of Business Ethics. – 2010. – Vol. 94 (3). – P. 441–453. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0275-x
  • Cuadrado D., Salgado J. F., Moscoso S. Personality, intelligence, and counterproductive academic behaviors: A meta-analysis // Journal of personality and social psychology. – 2021. – Vol. 120 (2). – P. 504–537. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/psP0000285
  • Гречкина Л. Ю. Академическая недобросовестность как псевдоадаптивное поведение студентов вуза // Вестник Бурятского государственного университета. Образование. Личность. Общество. – 2019. – № 1. – С. 27–35. URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=38173391
  • Molnar K., Kletke M., Chongwatpol J. Ethics vs IT Ethics: Do Undergraduate Students Perceive a Difference? // Journal of Business Ethics. – 2008. – Vol. 83 (4). – P. 657–671. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9646-3
  • LaDuke R. D. Academic dishonesty today, unethical practices tomorrow? // Journal of professional nursing: official journal of the American Association of Colleges of Nursing. – 2013. – Vol. 29 (6). – P. 402–406. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2012.10.009
  • Shmeleva E. Plagiarism and cheating in Russian universities: The role of the learning environment and personal characteristics of students // Вопросы образования. – 2016. – № 1. – С. 84–109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/1814-9545-2016-1-84-109 URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=25774647
  • Daniels L. M., Goegan L. D., Parker P. C. The impact of COVID-19 triggered changes to instruction and assessment on university students’ self-reported motivation, engagement and perceptions // Social Psychology of Education. – 2021. – Vol. 24 (1). – P. 299–318. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-021-09612-3
  • Hanafy S. M., Jumaa M. I., Arafa M. A. A comparative study of online learning in response to the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic versus conventional learning // Saudi medical journal.– 2021. – Vol. 42 (3). – P. 324–331. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15537/smj.2021.42.3.20200741
  • Djajadikerta H. G., Trireksani T., Ong T., Roni S. M., Kazemian S., Zhang J., Noor A. H. M., Ismail S., Ahmad M. A. N., Azhar Z., Shahbudin A. S. M., Maradona A. F., Yanto H., Wahyuningrum I. F. S. Australian, Malaysian and Indonesian accounting academics’ teaching experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic // Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal. – 2021. – Vol. 15 (2). – P. 103–113. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14453/aabfj.v15i2.7
  • McGee P. Supporting Academic Honesty in Online Courses // Journal of Educators Online. – 2013. – Vol. 10 (1). – Р. 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9743/jeo.2013.1.1
  • Caskurlu S., Richardson J. C., Maeda Y., Kozan K. The qualitative evidence behind the factors impacting online learning experiences as informed by the community of inquiry framework: A thematic synthesis // Computers & Education. – 2021. – Vol. 165 (2). – Р. 104111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104111
  • LoSchiavo F. M., Shatz M. A. The impact of the honor code on online course fraud // MERLOT Journal of Online Learning & Teaching. – 2011. – Vol. 7 (2). – P. 179–184. URL: https://jolt.merlot.org/vol7no2/loschiavo_0611.pdf
  • Faucher D., Caves S. Academic dishonesty: Innovative cheating techniques and the detection and prevention of them // Teaching and Learning in Nursing. – 2009. – Vol. 4 (2). – P. 37–41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2008.09.003
  • Hosny M., Fatima S. Attitude of students toward cheating and plagiarism: University case study // Journal of A Plied Sciences. – 2014. – Vol. 14 (8). – P. 748–757. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3923/jas.2014.748.757
  • Gaberson K. B. Academic dishonesty among nursing students // Nursing forum. – 1997. – Vol. 32 (3). – P. 14–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6198.1997.tb00205.x
  • McCabe D. L. Academic dishonesty in nursing schools: An empirical investigation // The Journal of Nursing Education. – 2009. – Vol. 48 (11). – P. 614–623. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20090716-07
  • Yu H., Glanzer P. L., Johnson B. R. Examining the relationship between student attitude and academic cheating // Ethics & Behavior. – 2020. – P. 1–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2020.1817746
  • Graham M. A., Monday J., O’Brien K., Steffen S. Cheating at Small Colleges: An Examination of Student and Faculty Attitudes and Behaviours // Journal of College Student Development. – 1994. – Vol. 35 (4). – P. 255–260. URL: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ489082
  • Balbay S., Kilis S. Perceived Effectiveness of Turnitin in Detecting Plagiarism in Presentation Slides // Contemporary Educational Technology. – 2019. – Vol. 10 (1). – P. 25–36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30935/cet.512522
  • Jereb E., Perc M., Lämmlein B., Jerebic J., Urh M., Podbregar I., Šprajc P. Factors influencing plagiarism in higher education: A comparison of German and Slovene students // PloS one. – 2018. – Vol. 13 (8). – Р. e0202252. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202252
  • Kauffman Y., Young M. F. Digital Plagiarism: An experimental study of the effect of instructional goals and copy-and-paste affordance // Computers & Education. – 2015. – Vol. 83 (1). – Р. 44–56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.12.016
  • Camara S. K., Eng-Ziskin S., Wimberley L., Dabbour K. S., Lee C. M. Predicting Students’ Intention to Plagiarize: an Ethical Theoretical Framework // Journal of Academic Ethics. – 2017. – Vol. 15 (1). – Р. 43–58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-016-9269-3
  • Mâță L., Lazăr I. M., Ghiațău R. Academic Dishonesty Practices Among Science Education University Students // Journal of Baltic Science Education. – 2020. – Vol. 19 (1). – Р. 91–107. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/20.19.91
  • Bretag T., Harper R., Burton M., Ellis C., Newton P. H., Rozenberg P., Saddiqui S., van Haeringen K. Contract cheating: a survey of Australian university students // Studies in Higher Education. – 2019. – Vol. 44 (11). – Р. 1837–1856. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2018.1462788
  • DraperM. J., Reid-Hutchings C. Are essay mills committing fraud? A further analysis of their behaviours vs the 2006 fraud act (UK) // International Journal for Educational Integrity. – 2019. – Vol. 15 (1). – Р. 11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-019-0050-4
  • Ruiperez-Valiente J. A., Munoz-Merino P. J., Alexandron G., Pritchard D. E. Using machine learning to detect 'multiple-account' cheating and analyze the influence of student and problem features // IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies. – 2019. – Vol. 12 (1). – Р. 112–122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2017.2784420
  • Amigud A., Dawson P. The law and the outlaw: is legal prohibition a viable solution to the contract cheating problem? // Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. – 2019. – Vol. 45 (1). – Р. 98–108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1612851
  • Şendağ S., Duran M., Fraser M. R. Surveying the extent of involvement in online academic dishonesty (academic dishonesty) related practices among university students and the rationale students provide: One university’s experience // Computers in Human Behavior. – 2012. – Vol. 28 (3). – Р. 849–860. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.12.004
  • Namlu A. G., Odabasi H. F. An unethical computer using a behavior scale: A reliability and validity study on Turkish university students // Computers and Education. – 2007. – Vol. 48 (2). – Р. 205–215. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2004.12.006
  • Chatterjee S., Sarker S., Valacich J. S. The behavioral roots of information systems security: Exploring key factors related to unethical its use // Journal of Management Information Systems. – 2015. – Vol. 31 (4). – Р. 49–87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2014.1001257
  • Mengist W., Soromessa T., Legese G. Method for conducting systematic literature review and meta-analysis for environmental science research // MethodsX. – 2020. – Vol. 7. – P. 100777. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2019.100777
  • King C. G., Guyette Jr. R. W., Piotrowski C. Online exams and cheating: An empirical analysis of business students' views // Journal of Educators Online. – 2009. – Vol. 6 (1). – Р. 1–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9743/JEO.2009.1.5
  • Al-Shehri, M. Code of Ethics for Teaching-Learning for an e-Learning System // International Journal of Computer A Plications. – 2017. – Vol. 166 (5). – Р. 16–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5120/ijca2017914043
  • Nelson L., Nelson R., Tichenor L. Understanding Today's Students: Engaging entry-level students in Scientific Dishonesty // Journal of College Science Teaching. – 2013. – Vol. 42 (3). – Р. 52–57. URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/43631795
  • Ma H. J., Wan G., Lu E. Y. Digital cheating and plagiarism in schools // Theory into Practice. – 2008. – Vol. 47 (3). – Р. 197–203. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00405840802153809
  • Morarji B. The Internet world and plagiarism // International Journal of Advanced Trends in Computer Science and Engineering. – 2019. – Vol. 6 (4). – Р. 1747–1752. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30534/ijatcse/2019/104842019
  • Chankova M. Teaching academic integrity: The missing link // Journal of Academic Ethics. – 2020. – Vol. 18 (2). – Р. 155–173. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-019-09356-y URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=43436691
  • Chang S. H., Shu Y., Lin Y. S., Wang C. L. “I Believe”, “I Think”, then “I Will”? Investigating the mediator role of ethical judgment between internet ethical self-efficacy and ethical behavioral intention // Computers in Human Behavior. – 2019. – Vol. 101. – Р. 387–393. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.10.034
  • Thayan B. M. Fraud and plagiarism in the context of the Middle East University // Journal of Education and Training. – 2017. – Vol. 6 (1). – Р. 158–166. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v6n1p158
  • Cilliers L. Evaluation of information ethical issues among undergraduate students: An exploratory study // South African Journal of Information Management. – 2017. – Vol. 19 (1). – Р. a767. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/sajim.v19i1.767
  • Chang C.‐M., Chen Y.-L., Huang Y.-y., Chou С. Why Do They Become Potential Cyber-Plagiarizers? Exploring the Alternative Thinking of Copy-and-Paste Youth in Taiwan // Computers & Education. – 2015. – Vol. 87. – Р. 357–367. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.07.006
  • Trushell J., Byrne K., Simpson R. Cheating behaviours, the internet and education undergraduate students // Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. – 2011. – Vol. 28 (2). – Р. 136–145. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00424.x
  • Uzun A. M., Kilis S. Investigating antecedents of plagiarism using extended theory of planned behavior // Computers & Education. – 2020. – Vol. 144. – Р. 103700. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103700
  • Molnar K. K., Kletke M. G. Does the type of cheating influence undergraduate students' perceptions of cheating? // Journal of Academic Ethics. – 2012. – Vol. 10 (3). – Р. 201–212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-012-9164-5
  • Stephens J. M., Young M. F., Calabrese T. Does moral judgment go offline when students are online? A comparative analysis of undergraduates' beliefs and behaviors related to conventional and digital cheating // Ethics and Behavior. – 2007. – Vol. 17 (3). – Р. 233–254. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10508420701519197
  • Akbulut Y., Dönmez O. Predictors of digital piracy among Turkish undergraduate students // Telematics and Informatics. – 2018. – Vol. 35 (5). – P. 1324–1334. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2018.03.004
  • Bacon A. M., McDaid C., Williams N., Corr P. J. What motivates academic dishonesty in students? A reinforcement sensitivity theory explanation // British Journal of Educational Psychology. – 2020. – Vol. 90 (1). – Р. 152–166. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12269
  • Curtis G., Cowcher E., Greene B., Rundle K., Paull M., Davis M. Self-Control, Injunctive Norms, and Descriptive Norms Predict Engagement in Plagiarism in a Theory of Planned Behavior Model // Journal of Academic Ethics. – 2018. – Vol. 16 (3). – Р. 225–239. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-018-9309-2
  • Miller A., Shoptaugh C., Wooldridge J. Reasons not to cheat, academic-integrity responsibility, and frequency of cheating // Journal of Experimental Education. – 2011. – Vol. 79 (2). – Р. 169–184. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00220970903567830
  • Etter S., Cramer J. J., Finn S. Origins of academic dishonesty: Ethical orientations and personality factors associated with attitudes about cheating with information technology // Journal of Research on Technology in Education. – 2006. – Vol. 39 (2). – Р. 133–155. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2006.10782477
  • Payan J., Reardon J., McCorkle D. E. The effect of culture on the academic honesty of marketing and business students // Journal of Marketing Education. – 2010. – Vol. 32 (3). – Р. 275–291. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475310377781
  • Underwood J., Szabo A. Academic offences and e-learning: Individual propensities in cheating // British Journal of Educational Technology. – 2003. – Vol. 34 (4). – Р. 467–477. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8535.00343
  • Bates I. P., Davies J. G., Murphy C., Bone A. A multi-faculty exploration of academic dishonesty // Pharmacy Education. – 2005. – Vol. 5 (1). – Р. 69–76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15602210500086264
  • Ercegovac Z., Richardson J. V. Academic dishonesty, plagiarism included, in the digital age: a literature review // College & Research Libraries. – 2004. – Vol. 65 (4). – Р. 301–318. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.65.4.301
  • Kohl E. K. Fostering academic competence or putting students under general suspicion? Voluntary plagiarism check of academic papers by means of a web-based plagiarism detection system // ALT-J: Research in Learning Technology. – 2011. – Vol. 19 (S. 1). – Р. 90–99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v19i3.7611
  • Trushell J., Byrne K., Hassan N. ICT facilitated access to information and undergraduates' cheating behaviours // Computers and Education. – 2013. – Vol. 63. – Р. 151–159. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.006
  • Tayaben J. L. Attitudes of student nurses enrolled in E-learning course towards academic dishonesty: A descriptive-exploratory study // Studies in Health Technology and Informatics. – 2014. – Vol. 201. – Р. 32–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-415-2-32006
  • Anderman E. M., Won S. Academic Cheating in Disliked Classes // Ethics & Behavior. – 2019. – Vol. 29 (1). – Р. 1–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2017.1373648
  • Costley J. Students ' perception of academic dishonesty at a cyber university in South Korea // Journal of Academic Ethics. – 2019. – Vol. 17 (2). – Р. 205–217. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-018-9318-1
  • Stogner J. M., Miller B. L., Marcum C. D. Learning to E-cheat: A criminological test of internet facilitated academic cheating // Journal of Criminal Justice Education. – 2013. – Vol. 24 (2). – Р. 175–199. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10511253.2012.693516
  • Шмелева Е. Д., Семенова Т. В. Академическое мошенничество студентов: учебная мотивация vs образовательная среда // Вопросы образования. – 2019. – № 3. – С. 101–129. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/1814-9545-2019-3-101-129 URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=39555186
  • Conradson S., Hernández-Ramos P. Computers, the Internet, and Cheating Among Secondary School Students: Some Implications for Educators // Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation. – 2004. – Vol. 9 (1). – Р. 1–8. URL: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/pare/vol9/iss1/9
  • Blau G., Kunkle M., Mittal N., Rivera M., Ozkan B. Measuring business school faculty perceptions of student cheating // Journal of Education for Business. – 2017. – Vol. 92 (6). – Р. 263–270. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2017.1339663
  • Chirikov I., Shmeleva E., Loyalka P. The role of faculty in reducing academic dishonesty among engineering students // Studies in Higher Education. – 2020. – Vol. 45 (12). – P. 2464–2480. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1616169 URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=45547150
  • Sattler S., Wiegel C., Veen F. V. The use frequency of 10 different methods for preventing and detecting academic dishonesty and the factors influencing their use // Studies in Higher Education. – 2017. – Vol. 42 (6). – P. 1126–1144. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1085007
  • Mahmud S., Bretag T., Foltynek T. Students’ perceptions of plagiarism policy in higher education: A comparison of the United Kingdom, Czechia, Poland, and Romania // Journal of Academic Ethics. – 2019. – Vol. 17 (3). – P. 271–289. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-018-9319-0
  • Vehviläinen S., Löfström E., Nevgi A. Dealing with plagiarism in the academic community: emotional engagement and moral distress // Higher Education. – 2018. – Vol. 75 (1). – P. 1–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0112-6
  • Ng C. K. C. Evaluation of academic integrity of online open book assessments implemented in an undergraduate medical radiation science course during COVID-19 pandemic // Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences. – 2020. – Vol. 51 (4). – P. 610–616. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmir.2020.09.009
  • Golden J., Kohlbeck M. Addressing cheating when using test bank questions in online classes // Journal of Accounting Education. – 2020. – Vol. 5. – P. 100671. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccedu.2020.100671
  • Alessio H. M., Messinger J. D. Faculty and student perceptions of academic integrity in technology-assisted learning and testing // Frontiers in Education. – 2021. – Vol. 6. – P. 629220. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021
  • Levine J., Pazdernik V. Evaluation of a four-prong anti-plagiarism program and the incidence of plagiarism: A five-year retrospective study // Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. – 2018. – Vol. 43 (7). – P. 1094–1105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1434127
  • Muhammad A., Ghalib M., Ahmad F., Naveed Q., Shah A. Research on the state of ethical development in e-learning // International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and A Plications (IJACSA). – 2016. – Vol. 7 (4). – P. 284–290. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2016.070436
  • Rettinger D. A., Jordan A. E., Peschiera F. Evaluating the motivation of other students to cheat: A vignette experiment // Research in Higher Education. – 2004. – Vol. 45 (8). – P. 873–890. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-004-5952-0
  • Koscielniak M., Bojanowska A. The role of personal values and student achievement in academic dishonesty // Frontiers in Psychology. – 2019. – Vol. 10. – P. 1887. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01887
  • Mathrani A., Han B., Mathrani S., Jha M., Scogings C. Interpreting academic integrity transgressions among learning communities // International Journal for Educational Integrity. – 2021. – Vol. 17 (1). – P. 1–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-021-00073-x
  • Baran L., Jonason P. K. Academic dishonesty among university students: The roles of the psychopathy, motivation, and self-efficacy // PLoS One. – 2020. – Vol. 15 (8). – P. e0238141. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238141
  • Yu H., Glanzer P. L., Sriram R., Johnson B. R., Moore B. What Contributes to College Students’ Cheating? // A Study of Individual Factors, Ethics & Behavior. – 2017. – Vol. 27 (5). – P. 401–422. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2016.1169535
  • Barque-Duran А., Pothos Е. M., Hampton J. A., Yearsley J. M. Contemporary morality: Moral judgments in digital contexts // Computers in Human Behavior. – 2017. – Vol. 75. – P. 184–193. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.05.020
  • Francis K. B., Howard C., Howard I. S., Gummerum M., Ganis G., Anderson G., Terbeck S. Correction: Virtual Morality: Transitioning from Moral Judgment to Moral Action? // PLoS One. – 2017. – Vol. 12 (1). – P. e0170133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170133
  • Alt D. Assessing the Connection between Students’ Justice Experience and Attitudes Toward Academic Cheating in Higher Education New Learning Environments // Journal of Academic Ethics. – 2014. – Vol. 12 (2). – P. 113–127. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-014-9202-6
Еще
Статья научная
SciUp 2024 © 2024 ©