Автономия воли в деликтном праве как предпосылка согласия на причинение вреда

The article examines the legal and ethical content of the principle volenti non fit iniuria as a fundamental basis for the victim’s consent to harm. The author analyzes this principle through the lens of private autonomy, revealing its connection with the ideas of self-determination and responsibility. Particular attention is given to the philosophical foundations of autonomy and their significance for justifying consent to harm. The paper also addresses the limits of autonomy in law, including issues of legal capacity, informed consent, and the permissibility of private regulation in tort relations. It is concluded that the principle volenti non fit iniuria is grounded in both deontological and utilitarian considerations, which make it possible to legitimize consent to harm.