Problems of designing new types of integration spaces

Problems of designing new types of integration spaces

Автор: Vityaz Pyotr Aleksandrovich, Shcherbin Vyacheslav Konstantinovich

Журнал: Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast @volnc-esc-en

Рубрика: Russia-belarus integrationas a tool of security strategy

Статья в выпуске: 3 (27) т.6, 2013 года.

Бесплатный доступ

The article analyses the conceptual content of the concept ‘space', the widespread use of which in different fields of scientific knowledge is the most obvious indication of ‘spatial turn', which was outlined in modern science in the late 1980s. The structure of the integration spaces formation theory, developed by the Belarusian researchers, is revealed. The necessity of designing the new types of integration spaces, the main economic resource of which is the latest scientific knowledge, is justified.

Concept of space, spatial turn in modern science, integration spaces of different types, integration spaces formation theory

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/147223472

IDR: 147223472

Список литературы Problems of designing new types of integration spaces

  • Aristotle. Categories: With the “Introduction” of Porphyry to Aristotle's “Categories”: translated from ancient Greek. 3rd ed. Moscow: Publishing House “LIBROKOM”, 2012.
  • Bakushev V.V. Integration trends in the policy of the leading international organizations and the new Russia. Moscow: Russian Academy of State Service under the President of the Russian Federation, 1997.
  • Balykin S. Integral is being prepared for sale. Director. 2008. No. 1. P. 21.
  • Becker K. Tactical Reality Dictionary: cultural intelligence and social control: translated from English. Moscow: Ultra. Kultura, 2004.
  • Biyakov O.A. Theory of economic space: methodological and regional aspects. Tomsk: Tomsk University, 2004.
  • Burnyasheva L.A. Problems of renovation of spiritual space in contemporary Russia. Sotsialno-gumanitarniye znaniya. 2010. No. 5. P. 265-273.
  • Vaganov A.G. Western investments and structure of Russian science. Naukovedeniye. 2001. No. 3. P. 84-91.
  • Vardomskiy L.B., Shurubovich A.V. Post-Soviet integration projects as a factor in modernization of the CIS economies. Integration of science as a factor in the construction of the Union State: scientific materials of the Inter-Academic Council on the problems of development of the Union State. Vol. 3. Ed. by S.M. Dedkov, V.K Yegorov. Minsk: Centre for System Analysis and Strategic Research of the NAS of Belarus, 2011. P. 21-39.
  • Wartofsky M. Metaphysics as heuristic for science. Structure and development of a science: Boston studies in the philosophy of science: translated from English. Moscow: Progress, 1978. P. 43-110.
  • Vityaz P.A., Shcherbin V.K. Promotion of inter-academic cooperation -the real way to the creation of a common scientific and technological space of the CIS. Bulletin of the Foundation for Fundamental Research. 2001. No. 4. P. 68-87.
  • Vityaz P.A., Shcherbin V.K. Inter-academic cooperation and the problem of formation of common scientific space of the CIS. Naukovedeniye. 2001. No. 4. P. 32-49.
  • Geyets V.M. Post-crisis architectonics of the European economic space. The world of transformations. 2011. No. 1. P. 137-151.
  • Danilov A.N., Shcherbin V.K. Integration. The Republic of Belarus: encyclopaedia. In 6 volumes. Vol. 3. Minsk: BelEn, 2006. P. 778-780.
  • Dedkov S.M. System approach to the geo-economic aspects of integration. Security & Eurasia. A journal of individual, national and collective security. 2002. No. 2. P. 142-145.
  • Dedkov S.M., Shcherbin V.K. Integration spaces: reasons for formation; specifics; the major classes. The Union State in the context of world integration processes: scientific materials of the Inter-Academic Council on the Issues of Development of the Union State. Vol. 2. Ed. by S.M. Dedkov, V.K. Yegorov. Minsk: The Centre for System Analysis and Strategic Research of the NAS of Belarus, 2011. P. 8-22.
  • Zhibulevskaya S.A., Shcherbin V.K. “Akademkniga” -one of the forms of integration of Belarusian and Russian science. Nauchnaya kniga. 2002. No. 2. P. 8-10.
  • Zamyatina N.Yu. Spaces of power: physical, metaphorical, mental. In: Space of power: Russia's historical experience and modern challenges. Ed by B.V. Ananyich, S.I. Barzilov. Moscow: MPSF, 2001. P. 64-82.
  • Zevin L. Structuring of the economic space of the CIS. Svobodnaya mysl. 2004. No. 11. P. 124-135.
  • Illustrated history of the Union State. Moscow: Rossiyskaya Gazeta, 2004.
  • Integrative tendencies in the modern world and social progress. Ed. by M. A. Rozov. Moscow: Publishing house of Moscow University, 1989.
  • Isakova N.B. Webification of innovation space and technology transfer. Problemy nauki (Kyiv). 2009. No. 10. P. 2-5.
  • Kaganskiy V.L. Russia -the USSR today? A comparative portrait of spaces. Article 3. The Russian Federation and Russian space. Obshchestvenniye nauki i sovremennost. 2005. No. 4. P. 100-112.
  • Krasina O. Construction of transnational space as a theoretical and methodological problem in the modern theory of world politics. Vlast. 2010. No. 11. P. 69-74.
  • Kustarev A. Science and politics. Neprikosnovenniy zapas. 2008. No. 6. P. 3-9.
  • Lossau J. Räume von Bedeutung. Spatial turn, cultural turn und Kulturgeographie. Translated from German. Germeneya: zhurnal filosofskikh perevodov. 2012. No. 1. P. 99-111.
  • Lukashevich V.K., Novitskaya T.Ye. Structure and dynamics of innovation space. Vesnik BGEU. 2010. No. 5. P. 103-111.
  • Lysenko V. Territorial aspects of structuring social space. Sotsialno-gumanitarniye znaniya. 2010. No. 6. P. 253-262.
  • Malitskiy B.A. How to evaluate the credibility of scientific achievements. Science and science of science. 2012. No. 3. P. 162-163.
  • Melnikov V.A. Metrization of economic space. Ekonomika i proizvodstvo. 2004. No. 2. P. 4-6.
  • Mirskiy E.М., Barbotko L.M., Borisov V.V. Scientific policy of the 21st century: trends, policies and mechanisms. Available at: www.courier.com.ru/top/cras.htm.
  • Mitsos A. European strategy for the movement towards knowledge-based economy and society. Knowledge-based society: new challenges for science and scientists: Materials of the international conference (Kyiv, 23 -27 November 2005). Kyiv: Phoenix, 2006. P. 51-56.
  • Mikhaylenko A., Vertlib Ye. Factor as the key concept of integration in the CIS. Belarus -Russia: neo-Soviet phenomenon of integration. Ed. by L. Zaiko. Minsk: Paradox, 2004. P. 327-347.
  • Morozov I. Post-Soviet economic space: historical view. Theoretical and practical issues of management. 2013. No. 2. P. 40-48.
  • Nevostruyeva A.F. Development of the social nature of information and communication space at the present stage. Vlast. 2013. No. 2. P. 38-42.
  • Nedilko V.I. Problems and prospects of reconstruction of a common scientific and technological space of the CIS. Vestnik of the Foundation for Fundamental Research. 1997. No. 2. P. 33-38.
  • Onopriyenko V.I., Onopriyenko M.V. The Internet galaxy and science in the globalizing world. Science and science of science. 2008. No. 1. P. 166-168.
  • Report on the research work “The theory of the formation of integration spaces of different types and mechanisms of their interaction” Academic advisor S.M. Dedkov. Minsk: The Centre for System Analysis and Strategic Research of the NAS of Belarus, 2013.
  • P.A. Vityaz -path in science. Ed.by O.V. Roman, A.F. Ilyushchenko, S. P. Vityaz. Minsk: Belorusskaya nauka, 2006.
  • Panarin A.S. Revenge of history: Russia's strategic initiative in the 21st century. Moscow: Publishing Corporation “Logos”, 1998.
  • The Address of the President of the Republic of Belarus Alexander Lukashenko to the Parliament. Available at: www.president.gov.by/press 29160.html.
  • Rakitov A.I. Historical cognition. System-gnosiological approach. Moscow: Politizdat, 1982.
  • Rogozin D.M. How to design a social space by contingent valuation method. Sociological journal. 2010. No. 4. P. 169-173.
  • Rybalka Ye.A. Concepts of space in social philosophy. Gumanitarniye i socialno-ekonomcheskiye nauki. 2009. No. 3. P. 39-44.
  • Selye H. From dream to discovery: On being a scientist. Translated from English. Moscow: Progress, 1987.
  • Semchenkov A.S. Cycles of reorganisation of political space and the ways to prevent internal conflicts in Russia. The Moscow University herald. Series 12. 2009. No. 2. P. 3-13.
  • Spencer H. The Classification of the sciences. Translated from English. Moscow: Vuzovskaya kniga, 2006.
  • Strezhneva M.V. European Union and the CIS: Comparative analysis of institutions. Moscow: Moscow Public Science Foundation, 1999.
  • Transnational political spaces: phenomenon and practice. Executive Editor M.S. Strezhneva. Moscow: Publishing house “Ves mir”, 2011.
  • Trubina Ye. G. Turn to the space: an interdisciplinary movement and problems with its promotion. The political conceptology: journal of metadisciplinary research. 2011. No. 4. P. 34-49.
  • Ushkalov I.G., Malakha I.A. Interstate migration of scientific personnel and the problems of development of scientific and technological potential of Russia. Naukovedeniye. 1999. No. 1. P. 20-35.
  • Tsepkalo V., Starzhinskiy V., Pavlova O. Leading cluster of IT-industry. The science and innovations. 2013. No. 4. P. 52-56.
  • Chekmarev V.V. On the theory of economic space. Problemy novoy politicheskoy ekonomii. 1999. No. 3. P. 25-38.
  • Chekmarev V.V., Gulbasov A.V. The theory of economic space. Kostroma: Nekrasov Kostroma State University, Smolensk State University, 2006.
  • Shapinskaya Ye.N. Power and resistance in the space of contemporary culture. Filosofskiye nauki. 2012. No. 10. P. 118-127.
  • Shvyrev V.S. Theory. New encyclopaedia of philosophy: in 4 volumes. Vol. 4. Moscow: Mysl, 2001. P. 42-45.
  • Sheleg N.S., Yenin Yu.I. Formation of regional integration associations in the post-Soviet space. Moscow: the Permanent Committee of the Union State, 2003.
  • Shishkov Yu.V. Theories of regional capitalist integration. Moscow: Mysl, 1978.
  • Shishkov Yu.V. Domestic theory of regional integration: the experience of the past and a look into the future. World economy and international relations. 2006. No. 4. P. 54-63.
  • Shmatko N.A. Horizons of socio-analysis. Socio-analysis of Pierre Bourdieu. Moscow: Institute of experimental sociology; Saint Petersburg: Aleteya, 2001. P. 13-46.
  • Shmelev V.V. Developing countries: tendencies and contradictions of economic integration. Moscow: Mysl, 1979.
  • Shumskiy N.N. Regional economic associations of the post-Soviet states: organizational and legal support of integration process. Minsk: Belaruskaya navuka, 2010.
  • Shcherbin V.K. Comparative chronology of integration activities for the creation of a common scientific and technological space of the CIS-states (1991-2001). Problemy upravleniya. 2003. No. 1. P. 33-40.
  • Shcherbin V.K. Typology of integration spaces in the aspect of content-analysis. Language and space: problems of ontology and epistemology: monograph. Ed. by A. E. Levitskiy, S.I. Potapenko. Nizhyn: Publishing house of Nizhyn Gogol State University, 2011. P. 130-174.
  • Shcherbin V.K. Concept of ‘post-Soviet space' and its concept-variables. The post-Soviet space in the world order of the 21st century: priorities, specifics, prospects: materials of the international scientific-practical conference. Minsk: Mediafakt, 2011. P. 82-91.
  • Ayres R. Technological forecasting and long-range planning. Translated from English. Moscow: Mir, 1971.
  • Language and space: problems of ontology and epistemology: monograph. Ed. by A. E. Levitskiy, S.I. Potapenko. Nizhyn: Publishing house of Nizhyn Gogol State University, 2011.
  • Yakobait K. Theory of integral integration. Regional integration in Central Asia: collection of articles. Berlin: German Foundation for International Development, 1995. P. 1-22.
  • Yarskaya V.N. Globalization of social space. In: Integration processes in modern society (according to the materials of the all-Russian scientific and practical conference). Ed. by M.E. Elutina. Saratov: Aquarius, 2003. P. 4-10.
  • Balassa B. The theory of economic integration. Homewood: Richard D. Irwin, 1961.
  • Rosamond B. Theories of European integration. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2000.
Еще
Статья научная
SciUp 2024 © 2024 ©