The protection of the defendant's rights in criminal trial by default - from the perspective of due process

Автор: Bu Yangyang

Журнал: Теоретическая и прикладная юриспруденция.

Рубрика: Статьи

Статья в выпуске: 1 (15), 2023 года.

Бесплатный доступ

Due to the change of the traditional procedural structure of the complete three parties of prosecution, defense and trial, criminal trial in absentia may result in the neglect of the rights protection measures due to the absence of the defendant in trial, and thus further impacts several principles and norms under the due process. Based on the criminal procedure system and even the reform of the entire judicial system, the discussion on the criminal trial in absentia should not be con ned to the basic frame of normal bench trial paradigm by due process, the possible adverse consequences should not be taken as the inevitable argument for criticizing the system, but rather a rational and neutral position, return to the original point of the system, seek the basic principles involved in the criminal trial in absentia, and respond to many doubts that the absent defendant’s rights are bound to fall, and thinking dialectically on this basis, from the two dimensions of system function, value presetting and perfection of existing speci cations, deduces and sums up the internal logic of this system in its normative construction, system operation and internal and external harmony, focusing on strengthening the rights protection of the defendant at the times.

Еще

Trial in absentia, legitimacy, rights protection, procedural relief

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/14127243

IDR: 14127243   |   DOI: 10.22394/2686-7834-2023-1-36-46

Список литературы The protection of the defendant's rights in criminal trial by default - from the perspective of due process

  • ZHANG Jieyu. Research on the Rights of the Defendant in Criminal Procedure by Default in China, Proceedings of the 2018 Annual Conference of the Chinese Society of Criminal Procedure Law, p. 367.
  • DENGSiqing. Study on Criminal Default Trial System, Chinese Journal of Law, 2007. No. 3. P. 92-112.
  • MichaelD Bayles. The Principle of Law — A Normative Analysis, Encyclopedia of China Publishing House, 1996, p. 35.
  • WAN Yi. On the Trial by Default System in Criminal Procedure, Contemporary Law Review, 2004. No. 1. P. 40-47.
  • HU Zhifeng. Study on Standard of Proof in Criminal Trial by Default, Journal of National Prosecutors College, 2018. No. 3. P. 116-126, 173-174.
  • XUGuodong. Interpretation of Basic Principles of Civil Law, China University of Political Science and Law Press, 1992, p. 333.
  • GustavRadbruch. Introduction to Law, Commercial Press, 2013, p. 170.
  • XIAOPeiquan. The Application of the System of Criminal Trial in Absentia under the Value Balance Theory, Law Science Magazine, 2018. No. 8. P. 50-59.
  • CHEN Guangzhong. The Latest Development of Foreign Criminal Procedure Legislation in the 21st Century, China University of Political Science and Law Press, 2004, p. 77.
  • CHEN Weidong, HU Zhifang. On Consideration of Right of Disposing by Criminal Litigant, Political Science and Law, 2004. No. 4. P. 119-126.
  • CHEN Weidong. On Criminal Default Trial system with Chinese Characteristics, Criminal Science, 2018. No. 3. P. 14-26.
  • LONG Zongzhi. Research on Criminal Court Trial System, China University of Political Science and Law Press, 2001, p.22.
  • YANG Ming, WANG Zheng. On Criminal Trial by Default, Criminal Science, 2003. No. 1. P. 71-76.
  • CHEN Guangzhong. Theory and Practice of Procedural Law (2005), China Founder Press, 2005, p. 679.
  • ZHANG Jixi. On the Scope of Application of Criminal Trial by Default — From the Perspective of Comparative Law, Criminal Science,2007. No. 5. P. 72-78.
  • WANG Yichao. The Scope of Application of Criminal Trial by Default — From the Perspective of Functional Analysis, Proceedings of the 2017 Annual Conference of the Chinese Society of Criminal Procedure Law, p. 342.
  • ZHANG Jianwei. Focus on Trial: Deep and Vertical Interpretation of Rights and Benefits Protection on Trial, Journal of CUPL, 2016. No. 5. P. 113-124, 161.
  • WAN Yi. Three Topics on Legislative Technique of Criminal Default Trial System: Focus on the Criminal Procedure Law of People's Republic of China (Amendment Draft), Criminal Science, 2018. No. 3. P. 27-37.
  • ZHAO Changcheng. Chinese-model Trial in Absentia from the Perspective of international Human Rights, Western Law Review, 2019. No.1. P. 76-88.
  • CHEN Weidong. Several Issues pn the Application of Criminal Trial by People's Procuratorate, Journal of National Prosecutors College, 2019. No.1. P. 40-50.
  • HUANG Feng. Legal Issues to be Paid Attention to in Absentia Trial of Fugitive Persons, Research on Rule of Law, 2018. No. 4. P. 58-66.
  • CHEN Guangzhong, Wang Haiyan. A Study on Lawyer's Defense in the Investigating Stage, China Legal Science, 2010. No. 1. P. 123-133.
  • BIAN Jianlin, YANG Yuguan. Summary of the United Nations Criminal Justice Standards. Journal of CUPL, 2003, p.105.
  • FAN Wen. The German System of Extradition: Principles, Structures and Changes, Global Law Review, 2016. No. 4. P. 127-146.
Еще
Статья научная