Performance Analysis of MANET Routing Protocols in Different Mobility Models

Performance Analysis of MANET Routing Protocols in Different Mobility Models

Автор: Anuj K. Gupta, Harsh Sadawarti, Anil K. Verma

Журнал: International Journal of Information Technology and Computer Science(IJITCS) @ijitcs

Статья в выпуске: 6 Vol. 5, 2013 года.

Бесплатный доступ

A mobile ad-hoc network (MANET) is basically called as a network without any central administration or fixed infrastructure. It consists of a number of mobile nodes that use to send data packets through a wireless medium. There is always a need of a good routing protocol in order to establish the connection between mobile nodes since they possess the property of dynamic changing topology. Further, in all the existing routing protocols, mobility of a node has always been one of the important characteristics in determining the overall performance of the ad hoc network. Thus, it is essential to know about various mobility models and their effect on the routing protocols. In this paper, we have made an attempt to compare different mobility models and provide an overview of their current research status. The main focus is on Random Mobility Models and Group Mobility Models. Firstly, we present a survey of the characteristics, drawbacks and research challenges of mobility modeling. At the last we present simulation results that illustrate the importance of choosing a mobility model in the simulation of an ad hoc network protocol. Also, we illustrate how the performance results of an ad hoc network protocol drastically change as a result of changing the mobility model simulated.

Еще

MANETs, Mobility Models, AODV, DSDV

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/15011917

IDR: 15011917

Список литературы Performance Analysis of MANET Routing Protocols in Different Mobility Models

  • Mobile ad hoc networks (MANET). http: //www.ietf.org/html.charters/manet-charter.html, 1997. IETF Working Group Charter
  • ns-2, Network simulator, http://www.isi.edu/nsnam/ns.
  • Tracy Camp, Jeff Boleng and Vanessa Davies, “ A survey of Mobility Models for Ad hoc Network Research”, Wireless Communications and Mobile computing: A special issue on Ad hoc network Research, vol 2, No5, pp. 483-502, 2002
  • C.E. Perkins, E.M. Royer & S. Das, Ad Hoc On Demand Distance Vector (AODV) Routing, IETF Internet draft, draft-ietf-manet-aodv-08.txt, March 2001.
  • Z. Haas and B. Liang. “Predictive Distance-Based Mobility Management for PCS Networks.” IEEE Conference on Computer Communication (INFOCOM’ 99), March 1999.
  • M. Sanchez and P. Manzoni. A java based ad hoc networks simulator.
  • The CMU Monarch Project. The CMU monarch extensions to the ns simulator.
  • Babak Pazand and Chris McDonald, “A Critique of Mobility Models for Wireless Network Simulation”.
  • Preetha Prabhakaran and Ravi Sankar, “Impact of Realistic Mobility Models on Wireless Networks Performance”.
  • Design and development of a routing protocol for mobile ad hoc networks (manets), ph.d. Thesis, Anil Kumar Verma
  • Nesargi and R. Prakash. “Distributed Wireless Channel Allocation in Networks with Mobile Base Stations.” IEEE Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM ’99), 1999
  • J. Broch, D. Maltz, D. Johnson, Y. Hu, and J. Jetcheva. “Multi-Hop Wireless Ad Hoc Network Routing Protocols.” ACM/IEEE International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (MOBICOM’98), pages 85-97, 1998
  • V. Davies. Evaluating mobility models within an ad hoc network. Master’s thesis, Colorado School of Mines, 2000.
  • B. Liang and Z. Haas. Predictive distance-based mobility management for PCS networks. In Proceedings of the Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (INFOCOM), March 1999.
  • X. Hong, M. Gerla, G. Pei, and C. Chiang. A group mobility model for ad hoc wireless networks. In Proceedings of the ACM International Workshop on Modeling and Simulation of Wireless and Mobile Systems (MSWiM), August 1999.
  • D. Johnson and D. Maltz. Dynamic source routing in ad hoc wireless networks. In T. Imelinsky and H. Korth editors, Mobile Computing, pages 153–181. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1996.
  • Z. Haas. A new routing protocol for reconfigurable wireless networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Universal Personal Communications (ICUPC), pages 562–565, Oct. 1997.
  • E. Royer, P. Melliar-Smith, and L. Moser. “An Analysis of the Optimum Node Density for Ad hoc Mobile Networks.” Submitted, 2000.
  • F. Bai, N. Sadagopan, and A. Helmy, A Survey Of Mobility Models in Wireless Adhoc Networks.
  • N. Moghim, F. Hendessi, and N. Movehhedinia, .An improvement on ad-hoc wireless network routing based on aodv, in the 8th International Conference on Communication Systems ICCS, vol. 2. IEEE, 2002, pp.1068.1070.
  • F. Bai, N. Sadagopan, and A. Helmy, .Important: A framework to systematically analyze the impact of mobility on performance of routing protocols for adhoc networks, in The 22nd Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (IEEE INFOCOM), 2003.
  • E. Royer, P. Melliar-Smith, and L. Moser. “An Analysis of the Optimum Node Density for Ad hoc Mobile Networks.” Submitted, 2000.
  • M. Zonoozi and P. Dassanayake. “User Mobility Modeling and Characterization of Mobility Pattern.” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 15(7), pages 1239-1252, September 1997.
  • Samir R. Das, Robert Castaneda and Jiangtao Yan, “Simulation based performance evaluation of routing protocols for mobile ad hoc networks”.
  • S. Lee, M. Gerla, and C. Chiang. “On-Demand Multicast Routing Protocol.” IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC’99), 1999.
  • Tracy Camp, Jeff Boleng and V Davies, “A survey of Mobility Models for Ad Hoc Network Research”, http://toilers.mines.edu last accessed on February 15, 2007.
  • C.E. Perkins, and P. Bhagwat, “Highly Dynamic Destination-Sequenced Distance-Vector (DSDV) for Mobile Computers,” Proc. ACM Conf. Communications Architectures and Protocols (SIGCOMM’94), London, UK, August 1994, pp. 234-244.
  • J.-Y. Le Boudec and M. Vojnovic. Perfect simulation and stationarity of a class of mobility models. In Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM’05, pages 72–79, March 2005.
  • Harri, J.; Filali, F.; Bonnet, C., Mobility models for vehicular ad hoc networks: a survey and taxonomy, Communications Surveys & Tutorials, IEEE, Fourth Quarter 2009.
  • Qunwei Zheng, Xiaoyan Hong, and Sibabrata Ray, Recent Advances in Mobility Modeling for Mobile Ad Hoc Network Research, ACMSE’04 April 2-3, 2004, Huntsville, Alabama, USA.
  • Diouba Sacko, Prof.Huang Benxiong, Prof. Wang Furong and I.Khider, Huazhong, “A Survey of group merge and split mobility models”, Ubiquitous Computing and Communication Journal, 2008.
  • Anuj K. Gupta, Harsh Sadawarti, Anil K. Verma, “Performance analysis of AODV, DSR and TORA Routing Protocols”, International Journal of Engineering & Technology, Article No. 125, 2(2): 226-231, April 2010.
  • Anuj K. Gupta, Harsh Sadawarti, Anil K. Verma, “Review of various Routing Protocols for MANETs”, International Journal of Information & Electrical Engineering, Article No. 40, 1(3): 251-259, November 2011.
  • Anuj K. Gupta, Harsh Sadawarti, Anil K. Verma, “Effect of mobility parameters on the performance of AODV routing protocol”, International Journal of Mobile & Network Technology, 3(1) :14-20, January 2012.
Еще
Статья научная
QR-код для установки приложения SciUp Наведите камеру и скачайте бесплатное приложение SciUp