Co-production between the provider and the recipient, as a method of increasing the performance in educational services

Автор: Baraba Maria

Журнал: Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast @volnc-esc-en

Рубрика: Foreign experience

Статья в выпуске: 6 (54) т.10, 2017 года.

Бесплатный доступ

The paper proposes the shaping of the concept of co-production in services and specifically refers to the educational process, respectively the cooperation between the supplier and the beneficiary of educational services. A “teacher-student” partnership is considered because we want to capture the system made up of the educational services provider and the active subject of educational training. The “teacher-parent” partnership isn't the subject of our research because we believe it may be a separate subject of research that transcends our current interest. After defining and clarifying the concept of co-production, an analysis is applied to a number of 500 respondents in education by giving concretely a questionnaire such as to provide adequate information for our purposes. The importance of the research undertaken resides in the conceptualization of the co-production between the offerer and the beneficiary in light of the elements through which it is reflected and in establishing connections between the availability of the beneficiaries to coproduce and certain elements taken into consideration such as the belief there will be some future advantages...

Еще

Co-production, cooperation, performance, mutual adaptation

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/147224000

IDR: 147224000   |   DOI: 10.15838/esc.2017.6.54.15

Список литературы Co-production between the provider and the recipient, as a method of increasing the performance in educational services

  • Andreassen T., Gustafsson A., Gebauer H. Co-production: A Fair-Weather syndrome? Journal of the academy of Marketing Science, 2010.
  • Baqer S.M. The value of Customer Co-production in Developing New Products. The University of Texas Arlington, 2006. Available at: www.citeseerx.ist.psu.edu
  • Bateson J.E.G. Perceived control and the service experience. In: Swartz T., Iacobucci D. (Eds.). Handbook of services marketing and management. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 127-144, 2000.
  • Becker G.S. Capitalul uman, editura All, București, 1997.
  • Bendapudi N., Leone R.P. Psychological implications of customer participation in co-production. Journal of Marketing, 2003, no. 67 (1), pp. 14-28.
  • Bettencourt L.A. Customer voluntary performance: customers as partners in service delivery. Journal of Retailing, 1997, no. 73 (3), pp. 383-406.
  • Bhappu A.D., Schultze U. The role of relational and operational performance in business-to-business customers' adoption of self-service technology. Journal of Service Research, 2006, no. 8 (4), pp. 372-385.
  • Bourguignon A., L'évaluation de la performance: du rationnel au symbolique. Universalité et contingence de la gestion des ressources humaines, 1993, vol. 2, pp. 19-33.
  • Cahn E. Time Banks -A Radical Manifesto for the UK. New Economics Foundation, 2001. Available at: https://www.mruniversity.com/sites/
  • Etgar M. Ways of engaging consumers in co-production. Technology Innovation Management Review, 2008. Available at: www.timreview.ca.
  • Garson D. Statnotes: Topics in Multivariate Analysis -Reliability Analysis. 2010. Available at: http://faculty.chass.ncsu.edu/garson/PA765/rel iab.htm
  • Grönroos C. Service management and marketing: Customer management in service competition (3rd ed.). Chichester: Wiley, 2007.
  • Gummesson E. Return on relationships (ROR): the value of relationship marketing and CRM in business-to-business contexts. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 2004, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 136-148.
  • Jivan Al. Productivité et servicité. Economies et Sociétés, No.4/2014, Cahiers de l'ISMEA, No 4/2014 (Série «Economie et Gestion des Services» EGS No 15, Avril 2014), pp. 579-599.
  • Needham C. Realizing the potential of co-production: negotiating improvements in public services. Social Policy and Society, 2008, no. 7(2), p. 221.
  • Ostrom E. Crossing the Great Divide: Coproduction, Synergy and Development", World Development, 1996, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 1073-1087.
  • Risch R.A, Schultz Kleine S. Customer participation in services production and delivery. In: Handbook of services marketing and management. 2000.
  • Schultze U., Bhappu A.D. Incorporating self-serve technology into co-production designs. International Journal of e-Collaboration (IJeC), 2005, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 1-23.
  • Terblanche N. S. Some theoretical perspectives of co-creation and co-production of value by customers. 2014. Available at: www.actacommercii.co.za
  • Vargo S.L., Lusch R.F. Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of Marketing, 2004, vol. 68, pp. 1-17.
Еще
Статья научная