Posterolateral musculofascial approach to intervertebral discs of the lumbar spine: anatomic and topographic study

Автор: Denis S. Godanyuk, Dmitriy A. Gulyaev, Ilya I. Korepanov, Ivan A. Kurnosov, Kseniya A. Chizhova, Nikita K. Samochernykh, Maxim M. Efimov

Журнал: Saratov Medical Journal @sarmj

Статья в выпуске: 3 Vol.4, 2023 года.

Бесплатный доступ

Objective: assessment of the anatomical and topographical parameters of the wound channel formed in the course of the posterolateral musculofascial approach with the purpose of identifying the possibility of its clinical use in decompressive and stabilizing surgical interventions. Materials and Methods: a posterolateral musculofascial approach to the lumbar spine was modeled using material from 20 male and female cadavers 54 – 76 years of age (median 67.5 years) who died from diseases not associated with the pathology of the spine. The study examined wound length, depth, wound depth index, and wound access zone, as well as the angle of intersection of the wound edges with the surface of surgical instruments. Results: the mean length of the surgical wound when performing the lateral musculofascial approach was 149.75±6.35 mm. The mean depth of the wound was 116.75±8.85 mm. The mean value of the surgical wound depth index with interfascial approach was 77.96±5.04. The mean area of the intervertebral disc available for removal was 71.2±2.8%. The length of the aperture in the annulus fibrosus was on average 15.8±0.78 mm. The mean angle of the intersection of the wound edge by the trajectory of transpedicular screw implantation was 3.15±1.25°. Conclusion:the assessment of the anatomical and topographical parameters of the wound channel formed during the posterolateral musculofascial approach allowed concluding that such surgical approach could be used to improve the functional outcomes of decompressive and stabilizing interventions on the lumbar spine.

Еще

Lumbar spinal stenosis

Короткий адрес: https://sciup.org/149146175

IDR: 149146175   |   DOI: 10.15275/sarmj.2023.0302

Список литературы Posterolateral musculofascial approach to intervertebral discs of the lumbar spine: anatomic and topographic study

  • Otani K, Kikuchi S, Yabuki S, et al. Lumbar spinal stenosis has a negative impact on quality of life compared with other comorbidities: An epidemiological cross-sectional study of 1862 community-dwelling individuals. Scientific World Journal 2013; (2013):590652. https://www.doi.org/10.1155/2013/590652
  • Katz JN, Zimmerman ZE, Mass H, Makhni MC. Diagnosis and management of lumbar spinal stenosis: A review. JAMA 2022; 327(17): 1688-99. https://www.doi.org/10.1001/jama.2022.5921
  • Allain J, Dufour T. Anterior lumbar fusion techniques: ALIF, OLIF, DLIF, LLIF, IXLIF Traumatol Surg Res. 2020; 106(1S): S149-57. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2019.05.024
  • Foley KT, Holly LT, Schwender JD. Minimally invasive lumbar fusion. Spine 2003; 28(15 Suppl): S26-35. https://www.doi.org/10.1097/01.BRS.0000076895.52418.5E
  • Godanyuk DS, Gulyaev DA, Kondyukov DA, Alugishvili ZZ. Method of surgical approach to the intervertebral disc in the treatment of degenerative instability of the lumbar spine. Patent for invention RU 2644922, 2018. (In Russ.).
  • Kim DH, Vaccaro AR, Dickman CA. Surgical Anatomy and Techniques to the Spine. 2 nd Ed. Elsevier Health Sciences 2013: 382-8.
  • Sozon-Yaroshevich AYu. Anatomical and Clinical Substantiations of Surgical Approaches to Internal Organs. Moscow 1954; 180 p. (In Russ.).
  • Kambin P, Casey K, O’Brien E, et al. Arthroscopic microdiscectomy: Comparison of preoperative and postoperative imaging studies. Arthroscopy. 1997; 13(4): 438-45. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/s0749-8063(97)90121-3
  • Maher CO, Henderson FC. Lateral exit-zone stenosis and lumbar radiculopathy. J Neurosurg. 1999; 90(1 Suppl): 52-8. https://www.doi.org/ 10.3171/spi.1999.90.1.0052
  • Ahn Y, Lee SH, Park WM, Lee HY. Posterolateral percutaneous endoscopic lumbar foraminotomy for L5-S1 foraminal or lateral exit zone stenosis. Technical note J Neurosurg. 2003; 99(3 Suppl): 320-3. https://www.doi.org/10.3171/spi.2003.99.3.0320
  • Park J W, Nam H S, Cho S K. Kambin's triangle approach of lumbar transforaminal epidural injection with spinal stenosis. Ann Rehabil Med. 2011; 35(6): 833–843. https://www.doi.org/10.5535/arm.2011.35.6.833
  • Mobbs RJ, Phan K, Malham G. Lumbar interbody fusion: Techniques, indications and comparison of interbody fusion options including PLIF, TLIF, MI-TLIF, OLIF/ATP, LLIF and ALIF. J Spine Surg. 2015; 1(1): 2-18. https://www.doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2414-469X.2015.10.05
  • Christie SD, Song JK. Minimally invasive lumbar discectomy and foraminotomy Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2006; 17(4): 459-66. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.nec.2006.06.001
  • Kang K, Rodriguez-Olaverri JC, Schwab F. Partial facetectomy for lumbar foraminal stenosis. Adv Orthop.2014; 2014: 534658. https://www.doi.org/10.1155/2014/534658
Еще
Статья научная